通过关联数据了解 Twitter 的使用情况:动机和在线行为分析

Shujun Liu, Luke Sloan, C. Jessop, Tarek Al Baghal, Paulo Serôdio
{"title":"通过关联数据了解 Twitter 的使用情况:动机和在线行为分析","authors":"Shujun Liu, Luke Sloan, C. Jessop, Tarek Al Baghal, Paulo Serôdio","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v9i4.2418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction & BackgroundUses and gratification (U&G) theory posits individuals’ engagement with social media is a deliberate effort to fulfill various needs, like information seeking, entertainment, and networking. However, prior studies predominantly addressed whether individuals use social media to satisfy their needs, leaving a gap in understanding how individuals behave online to satisfy needs. This study fills this gap by merging survey responses with actual Twitter activity, to investigate how individuals behave online to satisfy distinctive motivations, including (a) self-expression, (b) seeking entertainment, (c) business and working, (d) staying informed with news, and (e) networking. We also investigated how these online behaviors vary among individuals with different demographic features, including socio-economic classes, gender, and age. \nObjectives & ApproachOur research addressed questions by linking survey responses with actual Twitter activities within the U.K. Participants were asked to provide survey responses surrounding age, gender, socio-economic class, and motivations for using social media. They were also queried about the existence of Twitter account, willingness to disclose Twitter username, and, if agreeable, the username itself. The survey continued until a total of 2,195 individuals shared Twitter handles. Following the removal of accounts that were either suspended or nonexistent, the study proceeded with a final count of 1,915. \nWe collected each user’s Twitter metadata with Twitter API, including tweet count, follower count, following count, and bio information, and linked each user’s metadata with survey responses. To ensure respondents’ anonymity, survey, Twitter and linked data are stored separately, and can only be accessed by designated researcher. \nRelevance to Digital FootprintsThe study's approach of linking survey responses with actual Twitter activity offers a detailed insight into the digital footprints left by users as they engage with social media to satisfy their diverse needs. By analyzing the behaviors associated with motivations, this research illuminates the specific ways individuals curate their digital presence. \nResultsRegression analysis indicated that individuals motivated by self-expression tend to tweet (b = .28, SE = .06, p < .001), follow account (b = .38, SE = .06, p < .001), gain followers (b = .13, SE = .06, p = .035), and post bio details (b = .89, SE = .13, p < .001). Work and business motivation leads to post bio information (b = .38, SE = .15, p = .012), while networking leads to follow more accounts (b = .28, SE = .06, p < .001). \nSocial-economic class moderated associations between networking motivation and tweet count (b = -.25, SE = .09, p = .004), and between self-expression and tweet count (b = .20, SE = .08, p = .009). For individuals with higher socio-economic, self-expression has a higher effect on tweet count, whereas networking motivation has a less effect on tweet count. Additionally, we found gender moderated the association between self-expression and tweet count (b = .25, SE = .12, p = .04) and between keeping updated with news and tweet count (b = .11, SE = .05, p = .03). \nConclusions & ImplicationsThese findings offer a nuanced understanding of social media usage, highlighting how different motivations influence specific online behaviors. The novel approach of linking surveys with actual social media activity provides a more accurate representation of user behavior, contributing insights for academic and practical social media strategy and design.","PeriodicalId":507952,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":"109 26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Twitter Usage through Linked Data: An Analysis of Motivations and Online Behavior\",\"authors\":\"Shujun Liu, Luke Sloan, C. Jessop, Tarek Al Baghal, Paulo Serôdio\",\"doi\":\"10.23889/ijpds.v9i4.2418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction & BackgroundUses and gratification (U&G) theory posits individuals’ engagement with social media is a deliberate effort to fulfill various needs, like information seeking, entertainment, and networking. However, prior studies predominantly addressed whether individuals use social media to satisfy their needs, leaving a gap in understanding how individuals behave online to satisfy needs. This study fills this gap by merging survey responses with actual Twitter activity, to investigate how individuals behave online to satisfy distinctive motivations, including (a) self-expression, (b) seeking entertainment, (c) business and working, (d) staying informed with news, and (e) networking. We also investigated how these online behaviors vary among individuals with different demographic features, including socio-economic classes, gender, and age. \\nObjectives & ApproachOur research addressed questions by linking survey responses with actual Twitter activities within the U.K. Participants were asked to provide survey responses surrounding age, gender, socio-economic class, and motivations for using social media. They were also queried about the existence of Twitter account, willingness to disclose Twitter username, and, if agreeable, the username itself. The survey continued until a total of 2,195 individuals shared Twitter handles. Following the removal of accounts that were either suspended or nonexistent, the study proceeded with a final count of 1,915. \\nWe collected each user’s Twitter metadata with Twitter API, including tweet count, follower count, following count, and bio information, and linked each user’s metadata with survey responses. To ensure respondents’ anonymity, survey, Twitter and linked data are stored separately, and can only be accessed by designated researcher. \\nRelevance to Digital FootprintsThe study's approach of linking survey responses with actual Twitter activity offers a detailed insight into the digital footprints left by users as they engage with social media to satisfy their diverse needs. By analyzing the behaviors associated with motivations, this research illuminates the specific ways individuals curate their digital presence. \\nResultsRegression analysis indicated that individuals motivated by self-expression tend to tweet (b = .28, SE = .06, p < .001), follow account (b = .38, SE = .06, p < .001), gain followers (b = .13, SE = .06, p = .035), and post bio details (b = .89, SE = .13, p < .001). Work and business motivation leads to post bio information (b = .38, SE = .15, p = .012), while networking leads to follow more accounts (b = .28, SE = .06, p < .001). \\nSocial-economic class moderated associations between networking motivation and tweet count (b = -.25, SE = .09, p = .004), and between self-expression and tweet count (b = .20, SE = .08, p = .009). For individuals with higher socio-economic, self-expression has a higher effect on tweet count, whereas networking motivation has a less effect on tweet count. Additionally, we found gender moderated the association between self-expression and tweet count (b = .25, SE = .12, p = .04) and between keeping updated with news and tweet count (b = .11, SE = .05, p = .03). \\nConclusions & ImplicationsThese findings offer a nuanced understanding of social media usage, highlighting how different motivations influence specific online behaviors. The novel approach of linking surveys with actual social media activity provides a more accurate representation of user behavior, contributing insights for academic and practical social media strategy and design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Population Data Science\",\"volume\":\"109 26\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Population Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v9i4.2418\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v9i4.2418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介与背景 使用与满足(U&G)理论认为,个人使用社交媒体是为了满足各种需求,如信息搜索、娱乐和网络。然而,以往的研究主要探讨的是个人是否使用社交媒体来满足自己的需求,因此在了解个人如何通过网络行为来满足需求方面存在空白。本研究填补了这一空白,将调查反馈与实际的 Twitter 活动相结合,研究个人如何通过在线行为来满足不同的动机,包括(a)自我表达,(b)寻求娱乐,(c)商务和工作,(d)了解新闻,以及(e)网络。我们还调查了这些上网行为在不同人口特征(包括社会经济阶层、性别和年龄)的个人中的差异。目标与方法我们的研究通过将调查回复与英国推特的实际活动联系起来来解决这些问题。参与者被要求就年龄、性别、社会经济阶层和使用社交媒体的动机提供调查回复。他们还被问及是否有推特账户、是否愿意公开推特用户名,如果同意,还被问及用户名本身。调查一直持续到共有 2195 人分享了推特账号。在删除了被暂停或不存在的账户后,研究继续进行,最终统计出 1,915 人。我们通过 Twitter API 收集了每个用户的 Twitter 元数据,包括推文数、追随者数、关注数和简介信息,并将每个用户的元数据与调查回复进行了链接。为确保受访者的匿名性,调查问卷、Twitter 和链接数据均单独存储,只有指定的研究人员才能访问。与数字足迹的相关性本研究将调查回复与 Twitter 的实际活动联系起来,从而详细了解了用户为满足不同需求而使用社交媒体时留下的数字足迹。通过分析与动机相关的行为,本研究揭示了个人策划其数字存在的具体方式。结果回归分析表明,出于自我表达动机的个人倾向于发推文(b = .28,SE = .06,p < .001)、关注账户(b = .38,SE = .06,p < .001)、获得粉丝(b = .13,SE = .06,p = .035)和发布个人资料(b = .89,SE = .13,p < .001)。工作和商业动机会导致发布生物信息(b = .38,SE = .15,p = .012),而网络关系会导致关注更多账户(b = .28,SE = .06,p < .001)。社会经济阶层调节了网络动机与推文数量之间的关联(b = -.25,SE = .09,p = .004),以及自我表达与推文数量之间的关联(b = .20,SE = .08,p = .009)。对于社会经济地位较高的人来说,自我表达对推文数量的影响更大,而网络动机对推文数量的影响较小。此外,我们还发现性别调节了自我表达与推特数量之间的关系(b = .25,SE = .12,p = .04)以及保持新闻更新与推特数量之间的关系(b = .11,SE = .05,p = .03)。结论与启示这些发现提供了对社交媒体使用的细微理解,强调了不同的动机如何影响特定的网络行为。将调查与实际社交媒体活动联系起来的新方法更准确地反映了用户行为,为学术界和实际社交媒体战略和设计提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding Twitter Usage through Linked Data: An Analysis of Motivations and Online Behavior
Introduction & BackgroundUses and gratification (U&G) theory posits individuals’ engagement with social media is a deliberate effort to fulfill various needs, like information seeking, entertainment, and networking. However, prior studies predominantly addressed whether individuals use social media to satisfy their needs, leaving a gap in understanding how individuals behave online to satisfy needs. This study fills this gap by merging survey responses with actual Twitter activity, to investigate how individuals behave online to satisfy distinctive motivations, including (a) self-expression, (b) seeking entertainment, (c) business and working, (d) staying informed with news, and (e) networking. We also investigated how these online behaviors vary among individuals with different demographic features, including socio-economic classes, gender, and age. Objectives & ApproachOur research addressed questions by linking survey responses with actual Twitter activities within the U.K. Participants were asked to provide survey responses surrounding age, gender, socio-economic class, and motivations for using social media. They were also queried about the existence of Twitter account, willingness to disclose Twitter username, and, if agreeable, the username itself. The survey continued until a total of 2,195 individuals shared Twitter handles. Following the removal of accounts that were either suspended or nonexistent, the study proceeded with a final count of 1,915. We collected each user’s Twitter metadata with Twitter API, including tweet count, follower count, following count, and bio information, and linked each user’s metadata with survey responses. To ensure respondents’ anonymity, survey, Twitter and linked data are stored separately, and can only be accessed by designated researcher. Relevance to Digital FootprintsThe study's approach of linking survey responses with actual Twitter activity offers a detailed insight into the digital footprints left by users as they engage with social media to satisfy their diverse needs. By analyzing the behaviors associated with motivations, this research illuminates the specific ways individuals curate their digital presence. ResultsRegression analysis indicated that individuals motivated by self-expression tend to tweet (b = .28, SE = .06, p < .001), follow account (b = .38, SE = .06, p < .001), gain followers (b = .13, SE = .06, p = .035), and post bio details (b = .89, SE = .13, p < .001). Work and business motivation leads to post bio information (b = .38, SE = .15, p = .012), while networking leads to follow more accounts (b = .28, SE = .06, p < .001). Social-economic class moderated associations between networking motivation and tweet count (b = -.25, SE = .09, p = .004), and between self-expression and tweet count (b = .20, SE = .08, p = .009). For individuals with higher socio-economic, self-expression has a higher effect on tweet count, whereas networking motivation has a less effect on tweet count. Additionally, we found gender moderated the association between self-expression and tweet count (b = .25, SE = .12, p = .04) and between keeping updated with news and tweet count (b = .11, SE = .05, p = .03). Conclusions & ImplicationsThese findings offer a nuanced understanding of social media usage, highlighting how different motivations influence specific online behaviors. The novel approach of linking surveys with actual social media activity provides a more accurate representation of user behavior, contributing insights for academic and practical social media strategy and design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信