{"title":"精神因果关系辩论中的确定性、同一性和本质","authors":"J. Harbecke","doi":"10.3196/004433024838744312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article engages with Stephen Yablo's and Karen Bennett's theories on mental causation. I argue that both approaches can be integrated into a unified theory, yet this theory leaves a central problem unresolved. My main thesis is that the discussed approach leads to a moderate causal\n parallelism. Finally, I provide some indications of how such an approach can be transformed into a robust position.","PeriodicalId":296243,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung","volume":"116 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination, Identität und Essenz in der Debatte über Mentale Verursachung\",\"authors\":\"J. Harbecke\",\"doi\":\"10.3196/004433024838744312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article engages with Stephen Yablo's and Karen Bennett's theories on mental causation. I argue that both approaches can be integrated into a unified theory, yet this theory leaves a central problem unresolved. My main thesis is that the discussed approach leads to a moderate causal\\n parallelism. Finally, I provide some indications of how such an approach can be transformed into a robust position.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung\",\"volume\":\"116 13\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3196/004433024838744312\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3196/004433024838744312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Determination, Identität und Essenz in der Debatte über Mentale Verursachung
This article engages with Stephen Yablo's and Karen Bennett's theories on mental causation. I argue that both approaches can be integrated into a unified theory, yet this theory leaves a central problem unresolved. My main thesis is that the discussed approach leads to a moderate causal
parallelism. Finally, I provide some indications of how such an approach can be transformed into a robust position.