A. Caseiro, Seán Schmitz, Andreas Kerschbaumer, Erika von Schneidemesser
{"title":"政策评估中的低成本系统应用:柏林案例研究","authors":"A. Caseiro, Seán Schmitz, Andreas Kerschbaumer, Erika von Schneidemesser","doi":"10.1088/2752-5309/ad56bb","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Local policies are part of the toolbox available to decision makers to improve air quality but their effectiveness is underevaluated and underreported. We evaluate the impact of the closure of a street in the city centre of Berlin on the local air pollution. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) was measured on the street where the policy was implemented and on two parallel streets using low-cost sensor systems supported by periodic calibrations against reference-grade instruments and constrained by passive samplers. Further measurements of NO2 were conducted with a reference-grade instrument mounted on a mobile platform. The concentrations were evaluated against the urban background to isolate the policy-related signal from natural fluctuations, long-term trends and the COVID-19 lockdown. Our analysis show that the most likely result of the intervention is a reduced NO$_2$ concentrations to the level of the urban background on weekdays. Kerbside NO2 concentrations exhibited substantial differences to the concentrations measured at lampposts highlighting the difficulty for such measurements to capture personal exposure. The results have implications for policy, showing that an intervention on the local traffic patterns can possibly be effective in improving local air quality.","PeriodicalId":517104,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research: Health","volume":"98 36","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-cost system application for policy assessment: a case study from Berlin\",\"authors\":\"A. Caseiro, Seán Schmitz, Andreas Kerschbaumer, Erika von Schneidemesser\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2752-5309/ad56bb\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Local policies are part of the toolbox available to decision makers to improve air quality but their effectiveness is underevaluated and underreported. We evaluate the impact of the closure of a street in the city centre of Berlin on the local air pollution. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) was measured on the street where the policy was implemented and on two parallel streets using low-cost sensor systems supported by periodic calibrations against reference-grade instruments and constrained by passive samplers. Further measurements of NO2 were conducted with a reference-grade instrument mounted on a mobile platform. The concentrations were evaluated against the urban background to isolate the policy-related signal from natural fluctuations, long-term trends and the COVID-19 lockdown. Our analysis show that the most likely result of the intervention is a reduced NO$_2$ concentrations to the level of the urban background on weekdays. Kerbside NO2 concentrations exhibited substantial differences to the concentrations measured at lampposts highlighting the difficulty for such measurements to capture personal exposure. The results have implications for policy, showing that an intervention on the local traffic patterns can possibly be effective in improving local air quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Research: Health\",\"volume\":\"98 36\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Research: Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5309/ad56bb\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research: Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5309/ad56bb","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Low-cost system application for policy assessment: a case study from Berlin
Local policies are part of the toolbox available to decision makers to improve air quality but their effectiveness is underevaluated and underreported. We evaluate the impact of the closure of a street in the city centre of Berlin on the local air pollution. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) was measured on the street where the policy was implemented and on two parallel streets using low-cost sensor systems supported by periodic calibrations against reference-grade instruments and constrained by passive samplers. Further measurements of NO2 were conducted with a reference-grade instrument mounted on a mobile platform. The concentrations were evaluated against the urban background to isolate the policy-related signal from natural fluctuations, long-term trends and the COVID-19 lockdown. Our analysis show that the most likely result of the intervention is a reduced NO$_2$ concentrations to the level of the urban background on weekdays. Kerbside NO2 concentrations exhibited substantial differences to the concentrations measured at lampposts highlighting the difficulty for such measurements to capture personal exposure. The results have implications for policy, showing that an intervention on the local traffic patterns can possibly be effective in improving local air quality.