{"title":"25 千瓦水平轴风力涡轮机空气动力学和空气声学数值预测","authors":"Wen-Yu Wang, Y. Ferng","doi":"10.1093/jom/ufae024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this study, low-frequency-based numerical methods were used to predict the noise radiating from rotating horizontal axis wind turbine (HAWT) blades. The flow parameters in the vicinity of blade surfaces, which are required for the Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings (FW–H) equation, were calculated using ANSYS FLUENT. The numerical model was verified against the experimental re-sults from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory Phase VI wind turbine blades. The coupling analysis was integrated with four Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes turbulence models and FW–H equation under various boundary conditions. The standard k-ε, SST k-ω, and V2f turbulence models produced results in agreement with the available experimental pressure coefficient and relative velocity distribution data in the flow fields. Under the verification of aeroacoustic results, the SST k-ω turbulence model were more consistent with the LES data. An Institute of Nuclear Energy Research (INER) 25-kW HAWT was employed to predict noise frequency distribution at nine points on the tower on the windward and leeward sides under different operating conditions. Noise frequency distributions on the windward and leeward sides exhibited slight differences, whereas those on the left and right sides of the tower were different because of wind-shear influence. Under operating conditions, the decibels of the low-frequency noise at 0–200 Hz were ∼25–40 dB, and the noise frequency distributions on the windward and leeward sides were similar. With increasing distance, the decibel number of the monitoring point ∼25 m away dropped to 0 dB. For the noise prediction in Case 2 (wind speed = 12 m/s, pitches = 18°), the decibel number at 50 m was ∼25 dB and was ∼15 dB at 70 m. In Case 3 (wind speed = 18 m/s, pitches = 33°), the decibel number at 50 m was ∼30 dB and was ∼20 dB at 70 m. The peak amplitude of the noise was inversely proportional to the increasing distance from the tower but proportional to the wind and rotational speeds.","PeriodicalId":50136,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical Prediction of the Aerodynamics and Aeroacoustics of a 25 kW Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine\",\"authors\":\"Wen-Yu Wang, Y. Ferng\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jom/ufae024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In this study, low-frequency-based numerical methods were used to predict the noise radiating from rotating horizontal axis wind turbine (HAWT) blades. The flow parameters in the vicinity of blade surfaces, which are required for the Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings (FW–H) equation, were calculated using ANSYS FLUENT. The numerical model was verified against the experimental re-sults from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory Phase VI wind turbine blades. The coupling analysis was integrated with four Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes turbulence models and FW–H equation under various boundary conditions. The standard k-ε, SST k-ω, and V2f turbulence models produced results in agreement with the available experimental pressure coefficient and relative velocity distribution data in the flow fields. Under the verification of aeroacoustic results, the SST k-ω turbulence model were more consistent with the LES data. An Institute of Nuclear Energy Research (INER) 25-kW HAWT was employed to predict noise frequency distribution at nine points on the tower on the windward and leeward sides under different operating conditions. Noise frequency distributions on the windward and leeward sides exhibited slight differences, whereas those on the left and right sides of the tower were different because of wind-shear influence. Under operating conditions, the decibels of the low-frequency noise at 0–200 Hz were ∼25–40 dB, and the noise frequency distributions on the windward and leeward sides were similar. With increasing distance, the decibel number of the monitoring point ∼25 m away dropped to 0 dB. For the noise prediction in Case 2 (wind speed = 12 m/s, pitches = 18°), the decibel number at 50 m was ∼25 dB and was ∼15 dB at 70 m. In Case 3 (wind speed = 18 m/s, pitches = 33°), the decibel number at 50 m was ∼30 dB and was ∼20 dB at 70 m. The peak amplitude of the noise was inversely proportional to the increasing distance from the tower but proportional to the wind and rotational speeds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mechanics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jom/ufae024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jom/ufae024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Numerical Prediction of the Aerodynamics and Aeroacoustics of a 25 kW Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine
In this study, low-frequency-based numerical methods were used to predict the noise radiating from rotating horizontal axis wind turbine (HAWT) blades. The flow parameters in the vicinity of blade surfaces, which are required for the Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings (FW–H) equation, were calculated using ANSYS FLUENT. The numerical model was verified against the experimental re-sults from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory Phase VI wind turbine blades. The coupling analysis was integrated with four Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes turbulence models and FW–H equation under various boundary conditions. The standard k-ε, SST k-ω, and V2f turbulence models produced results in agreement with the available experimental pressure coefficient and relative velocity distribution data in the flow fields. Under the verification of aeroacoustic results, the SST k-ω turbulence model were more consistent with the LES data. An Institute of Nuclear Energy Research (INER) 25-kW HAWT was employed to predict noise frequency distribution at nine points on the tower on the windward and leeward sides under different operating conditions. Noise frequency distributions on the windward and leeward sides exhibited slight differences, whereas those on the left and right sides of the tower were different because of wind-shear influence. Under operating conditions, the decibels of the low-frequency noise at 0–200 Hz were ∼25–40 dB, and the noise frequency distributions on the windward and leeward sides were similar. With increasing distance, the decibel number of the monitoring point ∼25 m away dropped to 0 dB. For the noise prediction in Case 2 (wind speed = 12 m/s, pitches = 18°), the decibel number at 50 m was ∼25 dB and was ∼15 dB at 70 m. In Case 3 (wind speed = 18 m/s, pitches = 33°), the decibel number at 50 m was ∼30 dB and was ∼20 dB at 70 m. The peak amplitude of the noise was inversely proportional to the increasing distance from the tower but proportional to the wind and rotational speeds.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the Journal of Mechanics is to provide an international forum to foster exchange of ideas among mechanics communities in different parts of world. The Journal of Mechanics publishes original research in all fields of theoretical and applied mechanics. The Journal especially welcomes papers that are related to recent technological advances. The contributions, which may be analytical, experimental or numerical, should be of significance to the progress of mechanics. Papers which are merely illustrations of established principles and procedures will generally not be accepted. Reports that are of technical interest are published as short articles. Review articles are published only by invitation.