逆流而上--弗罗曼大法官作为颠覆性（法律）历史学家

Q3 Social Sciences

Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a16936

K. van Marle

{"title":"逆流而上--弗罗曼大法官作为颠覆性（法律）历史学家","authors":"K. van Marle","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a16936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"My tentative argument in this piece is that Justice Johan Froneman's engagement with history can be read as \"subversive\" and that this very subversiveness holds the possibility to destabilise legal culture and disclose possibilities for a \"rewriting\", a \"re-orientation\" of jurisprudence, and of law. I explore to what extent the way in which legal scholars, professionals and in particular judges invoke history and memory influences legal culture, and accordingly how we understand and do law.","PeriodicalId":55857,"journal":{"name":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal","volume":"57 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Going Against the Grain – Justice Froneman as Subversive (Legal) Historian\",\"authors\":\"K. van Marle\",\"doi\":\"10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a16936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"My tentative argument in this piece is that Justice Johan Froneman's engagement with history can be read as \\\"subversive\\\" and that this very subversiveness holds the possibility to destabilise legal culture and disclose possibilities for a \\\"rewriting\\\", a \\\"re-orientation\\\" of jurisprudence, and of law. I explore to what extent the way in which legal scholars, professionals and in particular judges invoke history and memory influences legal culture, and accordingly how we understand and do law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"57 14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a16936\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a16936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我在这篇文章中的初步论点是，约翰-弗罗曼大法官对历史的参与可以被解读为 "颠覆性 "的，而这种颠覆性本身就蕴含着颠覆法律文化的可能性，并揭示了 "重写"、"重新定位 "法理学和法律的可能性。我将探讨法律学者、专业人士，尤其是法官援引历史和记忆的方式在多大程度上影响了法律文化，并相应地影响了我们对法律的理解和实践。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Going Against the Grain – Justice Froneman as Subversive (Legal) Historian

My tentative argument in this piece is that Justice Johan Froneman's engagement with history can be read as "subversive" and that this very subversiveness holds the possibility to destabilise legal culture and disclose possibilities for a "rewriting", a "re-orientation" of jurisprudence, and of law. I explore to what extent the way in which legal scholars, professionals and in particular judges invoke history and memory influences legal culture, and accordingly how we understand and do law.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks

期刊介绍： PELJ/PER publishes contributions relevant to development in the South African constitutional state. This means that most contributions will concern some aspect of constitutionalism or legal development. The fact that the South African constitutional state is the focus, does not limit the content of PELJ/PER to the South African legal system, since development law and constitutionalism are excellent themes for comparative work. Contributions on any aspect or discipline of the law from any part of the world are thus welcomed.