是什么驱动了雇主在雇主点评平台上的好感度评分?符号、个人和情感内容的作用

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Christoph E. Höllig, Andranik Tumasjan, Filip Lievens
{"title":"是什么驱动了雇主在雇主点评平台上的好感度评分?符号、个人和情感内容的作用","authors":"Christoph E. Höllig,&nbsp;Andranik Tumasjan,&nbsp;Filip Lievens","doi":"10.1111/ijsa.12478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Employer review platforms have changed the recruitment landscape by allowing current and former employees to post messages about an employer outside of direct company control. Therefore, they have emerged as an important form of third-party employer branding. However, we know little about how such open-ended comments relate to the key variable in employer reviews: employers’ favorability rating. Therefore, we start by situating this variable among other constructs in the employer branding space. Next, we build theory on how content in the open-ended comments of an employer review relates to the positivity or negativity of the reviews’ favorability rating. We test our hypotheses via a text-mining analysis of approximately half a million employer reviews. The results reveal an intriguing discrepancy. Although instrumental, impersonal, and cognitive content is more prevalent in employer reviews, symbolic, personal, and emotional content dominates employer reviews’ favorability rating. In terms of practical implications, this result shows that merely inspecting the frequency of attributes mentioned in employer review text comments as a basis for changing company policies of employer branding efforts might be misguided. We discuss implications for theory and future research, and provide our dictionary for further scholarly and practical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":51465,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Selection and Assessment","volume":"32 4","pages":"579-593"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijsa.12478","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What drives employers’ favorability ratings on employer review platforms? The role of symbolic, personal, and emotional content\",\"authors\":\"Christoph E. Höllig,&nbsp;Andranik Tumasjan,&nbsp;Filip Lievens\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijsa.12478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Employer review platforms have changed the recruitment landscape by allowing current and former employees to post messages about an employer outside of direct company control. Therefore, they have emerged as an important form of third-party employer branding. However, we know little about how such open-ended comments relate to the key variable in employer reviews: employers’ favorability rating. Therefore, we start by situating this variable among other constructs in the employer branding space. Next, we build theory on how content in the open-ended comments of an employer review relates to the positivity or negativity of the reviews’ favorability rating. We test our hypotheses via a text-mining analysis of approximately half a million employer reviews. The results reveal an intriguing discrepancy. Although instrumental, impersonal, and cognitive content is more prevalent in employer reviews, symbolic, personal, and emotional content dominates employer reviews’ favorability rating. In terms of practical implications, this result shows that merely inspecting the frequency of attributes mentioned in employer review text comments as a basis for changing company policies of employer branding efforts might be misguided. We discuss implications for theory and future research, and provide our dictionary for further scholarly and practical use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Selection and Assessment\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"579-593\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijsa.12478\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Selection and Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsa.12478\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Selection and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsa.12478","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

雇主评论平台允许现任和前任员工在公司直接控制之外发布有关雇主的信息,从而改变了招聘领域的格局。因此,它们已成为第三方雇主品牌推广的一种重要形式。然而,我们对此类开放式评论与雇主评论中的关键变量--雇主好感度评级--之间的关系知之甚少。因此,我们首先将这一变量置于雇主品牌建设领域的其他结构之中。接下来,我们就雇主评论中的开放式评论内容与评论好感度的正面或负面关系建立理论。我们通过对大约 50 万条雇主评论进行文本挖掘分析来验证我们的假设。结果发现了一个耐人寻味的差异。虽然工具性、非个人性和认知性内容在雇主评论中更为普遍,但象征性、个人性和情感性内容在雇主评论的好感度评级中占主导地位。就实际意义而言,这一结果表明,仅仅检查雇主评论文本中提到的属性的频率,以此作为改变公司雇主品牌政策的依据,可能会误入歧途。我们讨论了这一结果对理论和未来研究的影响,并提供了我们的词典,供进一步的学术研究和实践使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

What drives employers’ favorability ratings on employer review platforms? The role of symbolic, personal, and emotional content

What drives employers’ favorability ratings on employer review platforms? The role of symbolic, personal, and emotional content

Employer review platforms have changed the recruitment landscape by allowing current and former employees to post messages about an employer outside of direct company control. Therefore, they have emerged as an important form of third-party employer branding. However, we know little about how such open-ended comments relate to the key variable in employer reviews: employers’ favorability rating. Therefore, we start by situating this variable among other constructs in the employer branding space. Next, we build theory on how content in the open-ended comments of an employer review relates to the positivity or negativity of the reviews’ favorability rating. We test our hypotheses via a text-mining analysis of approximately half a million employer reviews. The results reveal an intriguing discrepancy. Although instrumental, impersonal, and cognitive content is more prevalent in employer reviews, symbolic, personal, and emotional content dominates employer reviews’ favorability rating. In terms of practical implications, this result shows that merely inspecting the frequency of attributes mentioned in employer review text comments as a basis for changing company policies of employer branding efforts might be misguided. We discuss implications for theory and future research, and provide our dictionary for further scholarly and practical use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
31.80%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Selection and Assessment publishes original articles related to all aspects of personnel selection, staffing, and assessment in organizations. Using an effective combination of academic research with professional-led best practice, IJSA aims to develop new knowledge and understanding in these important areas of work psychology and contemporary workforce management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信