肺康复治疗在弥漫性肺实质疾病中的临床应用

Ambarish Joshi, Gorle Sujatha, Nitesh Gupta, Rohit Kumar, Manas Kamal Sen, P. Ish, Vidushi Rathi, H. Popalwar
{"title":"肺康复治疗在弥漫性肺实质疾病中的临床应用","authors":"Ambarish Joshi, Gorle Sujatha, Nitesh Gupta, Rohit Kumar, Manas Kamal Sen, P. Ish, Vidushi Rathi, H. Popalwar","doi":"10.4103/jalh.jalh_5_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) can help in improving the exercise capacity and quality of life (QoL) in diffuse parenchymal lung diseases (DPLDs), even in end-stage lung diseases listed for lung transplant. With the paucity of literature from the Indian population, the current study assessed PR’s benefits on the respiratory functions and exercise capacity in DPLD.\n \n \n \n This prospective interventional study was conducted over 18 months in patients with diagnosed stable DPLD who were previously not involved in any PR program. All the enrolled patients underwent 12-week in-hospital, supervised PR program, which included exercise training with increasing load, endurance training, resistance training, flexibility training, and stretching. The patients were evaluated for the measures at baseline and after 12 weeks of a rehabilitation program.\n \n \n \n There was a significant improvement in respiratory capacity forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), 6-min walk distance (6MWD), Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC), and total St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire scores (P < 0.05) after the completion of the PR program. Among the outcome parameters, there were no significant differences in the PO2 and FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio (P > 0.05) etiologically; the improvement was significant for all outcome parameters except MMRC and symptom score in the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) group (P = 0.165). In the non-IPF group, the improvement was significant for all outcome parameters except PO2 (P = 0.9). On multivariate linear regression, age was the only independent factor for 6MWD (P = 0.0002; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −5.019–−1.665) and MMRC (P = 0.005; 95% CI: 0.007–0.037).\n \n \n \n This study reveals that PR is effective for people with DPLD in decreasing the symptoms and improving the exercise capacity and QoL. Clinical improvement is greater in those with non-IPF compared to IPF, but both groups as a whole achieved clinically significant improvements. An adaptation of the PR regimen as per age may be necessary for optimizing the clinical benefits.\n","PeriodicalId":402083,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Lung Health","volume":"30 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Utility of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Diffuse Parenchymal Lung Diseases\",\"authors\":\"Ambarish Joshi, Gorle Sujatha, Nitesh Gupta, Rohit Kumar, Manas Kamal Sen, P. Ish, Vidushi Rathi, H. Popalwar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jalh.jalh_5_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT\\n \\n \\n \\n Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) can help in improving the exercise capacity and quality of life (QoL) in diffuse parenchymal lung diseases (DPLDs), even in end-stage lung diseases listed for lung transplant. With the paucity of literature from the Indian population, the current study assessed PR’s benefits on the respiratory functions and exercise capacity in DPLD.\\n \\n \\n \\n This prospective interventional study was conducted over 18 months in patients with diagnosed stable DPLD who were previously not involved in any PR program. All the enrolled patients underwent 12-week in-hospital, supervised PR program, which included exercise training with increasing load, endurance training, resistance training, flexibility training, and stretching. The patients were evaluated for the measures at baseline and after 12 weeks of a rehabilitation program.\\n \\n \\n \\n There was a significant improvement in respiratory capacity forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), 6-min walk distance (6MWD), Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC), and total St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire scores (P < 0.05) after the completion of the PR program. Among the outcome parameters, there were no significant differences in the PO2 and FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio (P > 0.05) etiologically; the improvement was significant for all outcome parameters except MMRC and symptom score in the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) group (P = 0.165). In the non-IPF group, the improvement was significant for all outcome parameters except PO2 (P = 0.9). On multivariate linear regression, age was the only independent factor for 6MWD (P = 0.0002; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −5.019–−1.665) and MMRC (P = 0.005; 95% CI: 0.007–0.037).\\n \\n \\n \\n This study reveals that PR is effective for people with DPLD in decreasing the symptoms and improving the exercise capacity and QoL. Clinical improvement is greater in those with non-IPF compared to IPF, but both groups as a whole achieved clinically significant improvements. An adaptation of the PR regimen as per age may be necessary for optimizing the clinical benefits.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":402083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Lung Health\",\"volume\":\"30 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Lung Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jalh.jalh_5_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Lung Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jalh.jalh_5_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 肺康复(PR)有助于提高弥漫性肺实质疾病(DPLD)患者的运动能力和生活质量(QoL),甚至有助于改善已列入肺移植名单的终末期肺病患者的生活质量。由于来自印度人群的文献很少,本研究评估了 PR 对 DPLD 患者呼吸功能和运动能力的益处。 这项前瞻性干预研究为期 18 个月,对象是之前未参与任何 PR 项目的确诊稳定型 DPLD 患者。所有入组患者均接受了为期 12 周的院内指导性 PR 项目,其中包括增加负荷的运动训练、耐力训练、阻力训练、柔韧性训练和伸展运动。对患者进行基线评估和 12 周康复计划后的评估。 完成 PR 计划后,患者的呼吸能力 1 秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、6 分钟步行距离(6MWD)、改良医学研究委员会(MMRC)和圣乔治呼吸问卷总分均有明显改善(P < 0.05)。在结果参数中,PO2 和 FEV1/ 强迫生命容量比(P > 0.05)在病因学上无显著差异;在特发性肺纤维化(IPF)组中,除 MMRC 和症状评分外,所有结果参数均有显著改善(P = 0.165)。在非 IPF 组中,除 PO2 外,所有结果参数均有显著改善(P = 0.9)。在多变量线性回归中,年龄是影响 6MWD(P = 0.0002;95% 置信区间 [CI]:-5.019--1.665)和 MMRC(P = 0.005;95% 置信区间:0.007-0.037)的唯一独立因素。 这项研究表明,PR 对减轻 DPLD 患者的症状、提高运动能力和生活质量有效。与 IPF 患者相比,非 IPF 患者的临床改善程度更大,但两组患者总体上都取得了显著的临床改善。可能有必要根据年龄调整 PR 方案,以优化临床疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Utility of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Diffuse Parenchymal Lung Diseases
ABSTRACT Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) can help in improving the exercise capacity and quality of life (QoL) in diffuse parenchymal lung diseases (DPLDs), even in end-stage lung diseases listed for lung transplant. With the paucity of literature from the Indian population, the current study assessed PR’s benefits on the respiratory functions and exercise capacity in DPLD. This prospective interventional study was conducted over 18 months in patients with diagnosed stable DPLD who were previously not involved in any PR program. All the enrolled patients underwent 12-week in-hospital, supervised PR program, which included exercise training with increasing load, endurance training, resistance training, flexibility training, and stretching. The patients were evaluated for the measures at baseline and after 12 weeks of a rehabilitation program. There was a significant improvement in respiratory capacity forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), 6-min walk distance (6MWD), Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC), and total St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire scores (P < 0.05) after the completion of the PR program. Among the outcome parameters, there were no significant differences in the PO2 and FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio (P > 0.05) etiologically; the improvement was significant for all outcome parameters except MMRC and symptom score in the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) group (P = 0.165). In the non-IPF group, the improvement was significant for all outcome parameters except PO2 (P = 0.9). On multivariate linear regression, age was the only independent factor for 6MWD (P = 0.0002; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −5.019–−1.665) and MMRC (P = 0.005; 95% CI: 0.007–0.037). This study reveals that PR is effective for people with DPLD in decreasing the symptoms and improving the exercise capacity and QoL. Clinical improvement is greater in those with non-IPF compared to IPF, but both groups as a whole achieved clinically significant improvements. An adaptation of the PR regimen as per age may be necessary for optimizing the clinical benefits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信