选定杀虫剂对豇豆中斑荚螟 Maruca vitrata (Fab.) 的药效和经济性

Likhitkar Kunjum Pradeeprao, Ashwani Kumar
{"title":"选定杀虫剂对豇豆中斑荚螟 Maruca vitrata (Fab.) 的药效和经济性","authors":"Likhitkar Kunjum Pradeeprao, Ashwani Kumar","doi":"10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i74746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A field trail was conducted at Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif season 2023 at central research farm, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, in Randomized Block Design with eight treatments replicated thrice times were evaluated against Maruca vitrata i.e. Spinosad45%SC, Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (300ppm), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin 4%EC, Nisco sixer plus, Beauveria bassiana1.15%WP, Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG, Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% and Control. Results revealed that, among the different treatments lowest larval population of cowpea spotted pod borer was recorded in Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG (0.95), Spinosad45%SC (1.15) was found to be the next best treatment followed by Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin 4%EC (1.35), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% ( 1.64 ) and Nisco sixer plus (1.75), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP, (1.95) whereas Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (300ppm) (2.15) was found to be least effective against this pest. The plot treated with Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG show highest yield (36.66 q/ha) followed by Spinosad45%SC (34.83 q/ha), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC (33.66 q/ha), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% (32.48q/ha), Nisco sixer plus (28.30 q/ha), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP (27.60q/ha) and Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (26.05q/ha) as compared to control plot (16.85 q/ha). Among the treatments the best and most economical treatment was Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG (1:3.55) followed by Spinosad 45%SC (1:3.11), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC (1:3.24), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% (1:2.71), Nisco sixer plus (1:2.39), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP (1:2.34) and Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (1:2.16) as compared to control plot (1:1.20).","PeriodicalId":14186,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Plant & Soil Science","volume":"114 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Economics of Selected Insecticides against Spotted Pod Borer, Maruca vitrata (Fab.) in Cowpea\",\"authors\":\"Likhitkar Kunjum Pradeeprao, Ashwani Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i74746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A field trail was conducted at Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif season 2023 at central research farm, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, in Randomized Block Design with eight treatments replicated thrice times were evaluated against Maruca vitrata i.e. Spinosad45%SC, Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (300ppm), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin 4%EC, Nisco sixer plus, Beauveria bassiana1.15%WP, Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG, Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% and Control. Results revealed that, among the different treatments lowest larval population of cowpea spotted pod borer was recorded in Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG (0.95), Spinosad45%SC (1.15) was found to be the next best treatment followed by Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin 4%EC (1.35), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% ( 1.64 ) and Nisco sixer plus (1.75), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP, (1.95) whereas Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (300ppm) (2.15) was found to be least effective against this pest. The plot treated with Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG show highest yield (36.66 q/ha) followed by Spinosad45%SC (34.83 q/ha), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC (33.66 q/ha), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% (32.48q/ha), Nisco sixer plus (28.30 q/ha), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP (27.60q/ha) and Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (26.05q/ha) as compared to control plot (16.85 q/ha). Among the treatments the best and most economical treatment was Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG (1:3.55) followed by Spinosad 45%SC (1:3.11), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC (1:3.24), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% (1:2.71), Nisco sixer plus (1:2.39), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP (1:2.34) and Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (1:2.16) as compared to control plot (1:1.20).\",\"PeriodicalId\":14186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Plant & Soil Science\",\"volume\":\"114 16\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Plant & Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i74746\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Plant & Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i74746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2023 年 Kharif 季节,在普拉格拉杰(Prayagraj)萨姆-希金博顿农业、技术和科学大学中央研究农场的奈尼(Naini)进行了一次田间试验,采用随机区组设计,对 Maruca vitrata 进行了八种处理(重复三次)的评估。即 Spinosad45%SC、Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP(300ppm)、Profenofos 40%+Cypermethrin 4%EC、Nisco sixer plus、Beauveria bassiana1.15%WP、Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG、Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% 和对照。结果表明,在不同的处理中,Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG 的豇豆斑荚螟幼虫数量最少(0.95),Spinosad45%SC(1.15)次之,其次是 Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin 4%EC(1.其次是 Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% (1.64)和 Nisco sixer plus (1.75)、Beauveria bassiana1.15%WP(1.95),而 Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP(300ppm)(2.15)对这种害虫的防治效果最差。使用 5%苯甲酸二甲胺磷(Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG )处理的地块产量最高(36.66 q/ha),其次是 Spinosad45%SC (34.83 q/ha)、Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC (33.66 q/ha)、Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% (32.48q/ha)、Nisco sixer plus(28.30 q/ha)、Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP(27.60q/ha)和 Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP(26.05q/ha),而对照小区为 16.85 q/ha。在各种处理中,最佳和最经济的处理是 5%苯甲酸二甲胺磷(1:3.55),其次是施皮诺沙 45%SC(1:3.11)、丙溴磷 40%+氯氰菊酯 4%EC(1:3.24)、Spinosad45%SC + 印楝油 5% (1:2.71)、Nisco sixer plus (1:2.39)、Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP (1:2.34)和 Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (1:2.16),与对照小区(1:1.20)相比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Economics of Selected Insecticides against Spotted Pod Borer, Maruca vitrata (Fab.) in Cowpea
A field trail was conducted at Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif season 2023 at central research farm, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, in Randomized Block Design with eight treatments replicated thrice times were evaluated against Maruca vitrata i.e. Spinosad45%SC, Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (300ppm), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin 4%EC, Nisco sixer plus, Beauveria bassiana1.15%WP, Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG, Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% and Control. Results revealed that, among the different treatments lowest larval population of cowpea spotted pod borer was recorded in Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG (0.95), Spinosad45%SC (1.15) was found to be the next best treatment followed by Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin 4%EC (1.35), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% ( 1.64 ) and Nisco sixer plus (1.75), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP, (1.95) whereas Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (300ppm) (2.15) was found to be least effective against this pest. The plot treated with Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG show highest yield (36.66 q/ha) followed by Spinosad45%SC (34.83 q/ha), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC (33.66 q/ha), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% (32.48q/ha), Nisco sixer plus (28.30 q/ha), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP (27.60q/ha) and Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (26.05q/ha) as compared to control plot (16.85 q/ha). Among the treatments the best and most economical treatment was Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG (1:3.55) followed by Spinosad 45%SC (1:3.11), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC (1:3.24), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% (1:2.71), Nisco sixer plus (1:2.39), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP (1:2.34) and Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (1:2.16) as compared to control plot (1:1.20).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信