贸易战和经济制裁背景下的国家经济安全战略

Zhichao Shi, K. Kurilenok
{"title":"贸易战和经济制裁背景下的国家经济安全战略","authors":"Zhichao Shi, K. Kurilenok","doi":"10.29235/1818-9857-2024-05-35-39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of «economic potential» is widely used in national economic security research. But usually, it may turn inadequate in case of analysis trade war and politically motivated economic sanctions. We argue that it can be replaced with game theory concept of bargaining power. In the result of the change in paradigm, all the involved parties can get the common strategy of resolving the conflict. As an example, the PRC – USA trade war is taken.","PeriodicalId":510035,"journal":{"name":"Science and Innovations","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategy for national economic security in the context of trade wars and economic sanctions\",\"authors\":\"Zhichao Shi, K. Kurilenok\",\"doi\":\"10.29235/1818-9857-2024-05-35-39\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concept of «economic potential» is widely used in national economic security research. But usually, it may turn inadequate in case of analysis trade war and politically motivated economic sanctions. We argue that it can be replaced with game theory concept of bargaining power. In the result of the change in paradigm, all the involved parties can get the common strategy of resolving the conflict. As an example, the PRC – USA trade war is taken.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science and Innovations\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science and Innovations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29235/1818-9857-2024-05-35-39\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29235/1818-9857-2024-05-35-39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经济潜力 "这一概念在国家经济安全研究中被广泛使用。但通常情况下,在分析贸易战和出于政治动机的经济制裁时,这一概念可能会变得不够充分。我们认为,可以用博弈论中的 "讨价还价能力 "概念来取代这一概念。由于范式的改变,所有参与方都能获得解决冲突的共同策略。以中美贸易战为例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategy for national economic security in the context of trade wars and economic sanctions
The concept of «economic potential» is widely used in national economic security research. But usually, it may turn inadequate in case of analysis trade war and politically motivated economic sanctions. We argue that it can be replaced with game theory concept of bargaining power. In the result of the change in paradigm, all the involved parties can get the common strategy of resolving the conflict. As an example, the PRC – USA trade war is taken.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信