{"title":"从废水中回收氮,提高污水处理的可持续性","authors":"Hakan Jönsson, A. Malovanyy, S. Tumlin","doi":"10.2166/wpt.2024.156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Flows of reactive nitrogen (Nr) and greenhouse gas emissions from society are exceeding planetary boundaries, posing a serious risk to the stability of living conditions on Earth. Wastewater contains the largest flows of Nr in urban society, so recycling Nr from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) could reduce the climate impact and the need for new Nr. The reject water from dewatering anaerobically digested sludge contains high concentrations of Nr and recovery of this Nr would decrease the load on biological nitrogen removal processes, and thus nitrous oxide emissions. Simultaneously, the need for external carbon sources and energy for aeration will decrease. In a case study at Rya WWTP in Gothenburg, Sweden, three Nr recovery technologies were investigated: (1) conventional ammonia stripping to ammonium sulphate; (2) thermal stripping to ammonium sulphate and (3) distillation of ammonia from reject water to ammonia water. All three technologies were found to decrease the climate impact compared with the removal processes currently used at Rya WWTP for the removal of Nr. Recovery by distillation to ammonia water had the lowest climate impact, while conventional stripping minimised the energy requirement.","PeriodicalId":104096,"journal":{"name":"Water Practice & Technology","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nitrogen recovery from reject water for improved sustainability of wastewater treatment\",\"authors\":\"Hakan Jönsson, A. Malovanyy, S. Tumlin\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/wpt.2024.156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Flows of reactive nitrogen (Nr) and greenhouse gas emissions from society are exceeding planetary boundaries, posing a serious risk to the stability of living conditions on Earth. Wastewater contains the largest flows of Nr in urban society, so recycling Nr from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) could reduce the climate impact and the need for new Nr. The reject water from dewatering anaerobically digested sludge contains high concentrations of Nr and recovery of this Nr would decrease the load on biological nitrogen removal processes, and thus nitrous oxide emissions. Simultaneously, the need for external carbon sources and energy for aeration will decrease. In a case study at Rya WWTP in Gothenburg, Sweden, three Nr recovery technologies were investigated: (1) conventional ammonia stripping to ammonium sulphate; (2) thermal stripping to ammonium sulphate and (3) distillation of ammonia from reject water to ammonia water. All three technologies were found to decrease the climate impact compared with the removal processes currently used at Rya WWTP for the removal of Nr. Recovery by distillation to ammonia water had the lowest climate impact, while conventional stripping minimised the energy requirement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":104096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Practice & Technology\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Practice & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2024.156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Practice & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2024.156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
来自社会的活性氮(Nr)流量和温室气体排放量正在超过地球的极限,对地球生活条件的稳定构成严重威胁。在城市社会中,废水中的活性氮流量最大,因此回收利用废水处理厂(WWTP)中的活性氮可以减少对气候的影响和对新活性氮的需求。厌氧消化污泥脱水后的废水中含有高浓度的氮,回收这些氮可以减少生物脱氮过程的负荷,从而减少一氧化二氮的排放。同时,对外部碳源和曝气能源的需求也会减少。在瑞典哥德堡 Rya 污水处理厂进行的一项案例研究中,对三种氮回收技术进行了调查:(1) 传统氨汽提法制硫酸铵;(2) 热汽提法制硫酸铵;(3) 将废水中的氨蒸馏为氨水。与 Rya 污水处理厂目前使用的去除 Nr 的工艺相比,这三种技术都能减少对气候的影响。通过蒸馏回收氨水对气候的影响最小,而传统的汽提工艺则将能源需求降至最低。
Nitrogen recovery from reject water for improved sustainability of wastewater treatment
Flows of reactive nitrogen (Nr) and greenhouse gas emissions from society are exceeding planetary boundaries, posing a serious risk to the stability of living conditions on Earth. Wastewater contains the largest flows of Nr in urban society, so recycling Nr from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) could reduce the climate impact and the need for new Nr. The reject water from dewatering anaerobically digested sludge contains high concentrations of Nr and recovery of this Nr would decrease the load on biological nitrogen removal processes, and thus nitrous oxide emissions. Simultaneously, the need for external carbon sources and energy for aeration will decrease. In a case study at Rya WWTP in Gothenburg, Sweden, three Nr recovery technologies were investigated: (1) conventional ammonia stripping to ammonium sulphate; (2) thermal stripping to ammonium sulphate and (3) distillation of ammonia from reject water to ammonia water. All three technologies were found to decrease the climate impact compared with the removal processes currently used at Rya WWTP for the removal of Nr. Recovery by distillation to ammonia water had the lowest climate impact, while conventional stripping minimised the energy requirement.