基于理论的教育干预对促进慢性腰背痛患者体育活动相关行为的有效性:基于健康中心的随机对照试验(TRA -BAC)

Mohammad Hossein Delshad, Alireza A Hidarnia, F. Pourhaji
{"title":"基于理论的教育干预对促进慢性腰背痛患者体育活动相关行为的有效性:基于健康中心的随机对照试验(TRA -BAC)","authors":"Mohammad Hossein Delshad, Alireza A Hidarnia, F. Pourhaji","doi":"10.15448/1980-6108.2024.1.45567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) – based educational program in promoting physical activity (PA) behavior in Chronic low back pain (cLBP) patients.Methods: the Reasoned Action Theory-based Back Care program was a randomized controlled trial conducted at a Health Service Center. It compared the TRA construct’s effectiveness against a control group. Eighty patients referred to Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Tehran were randomly assigned to either the TRA-based intervention group (n=40) or the control group (n=40).Both groups completed self-reported questionnaires at baseline, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups. Additionally, a checklist was used to assess lumbar spine range of motion test skills using the modified Schober test.Results: a significant interaction effect was observed between “group” and “test time” factors (p<0.001). A total of 77 cLBP patients were evaluated, with a mean age of 41.0±4.2 years in the intervention group and 39.0±3.5 years in the control group. While both groups initially aligned with TRA constructs (p>0.05), the intervention group demonstrated significant improvements in PA-related behavior at both 3-month (p<0.001) and 6-month (p<0.001) follow-ups. The mean score for PA behavior in the intervention group (8.4 ± 1.1) was significantly higher compared to the control group (3.2±1.0) (p<0.001). Similarly, pain intensity was significantly lower in the intervention group (3.8±2.2) compared to the control group (4.3±3.0) (p<0.001). Furthermore, the intervention group showed a significant improvement in lumbar spine range of motion test skills (p<0.05). The lumbar spine range of motion test skills of the intervention group significantly decreased (p<0.05).Conclusions: the TRA-BAC program demonstrates promise in improving PA-related behavior and reducing pain in cLBP patients through targeted educational strategies based on the TRA framework.","PeriodicalId":510037,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Medica","volume":"67 45","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of a theory-based educational intervention on promoting physical activity-related behavior in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial based on health center (TRA -BAC)\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Hossein Delshad, Alireza A Hidarnia, F. Pourhaji\",\"doi\":\"10.15448/1980-6108.2024.1.45567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims: this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) – based educational program in promoting physical activity (PA) behavior in Chronic low back pain (cLBP) patients.Methods: the Reasoned Action Theory-based Back Care program was a randomized controlled trial conducted at a Health Service Center. It compared the TRA construct’s effectiveness against a control group. Eighty patients referred to Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Tehran were randomly assigned to either the TRA-based intervention group (n=40) or the control group (n=40).Both groups completed self-reported questionnaires at baseline, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups. Additionally, a checklist was used to assess lumbar spine range of motion test skills using the modified Schober test.Results: a significant interaction effect was observed between “group” and “test time” factors (p<0.001). A total of 77 cLBP patients were evaluated, with a mean age of 41.0±4.2 years in the intervention group and 39.0±3.5 years in the control group. While both groups initially aligned with TRA constructs (p>0.05), the intervention group demonstrated significant improvements in PA-related behavior at both 3-month (p<0.001) and 6-month (p<0.001) follow-ups. The mean score for PA behavior in the intervention group (8.4 ± 1.1) was significantly higher compared to the control group (3.2±1.0) (p<0.001). Similarly, pain intensity was significantly lower in the intervention group (3.8±2.2) compared to the control group (4.3±3.0) (p<0.001). Furthermore, the intervention group showed a significant improvement in lumbar spine range of motion test skills (p<0.05). The lumbar spine range of motion test skills of the intervention group significantly decreased (p<0.05).Conclusions: the TRA-BAC program demonstrates promise in improving PA-related behavior and reducing pain in cLBP patients through targeted educational strategies based on the TRA framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientia Medica\",\"volume\":\"67 45\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientia Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6108.2024.1.45567\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6108.2024.1.45567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估基于合理行动理论(TRA)的教育计划在促进慢性腰背痛(cLBP)患者体育锻炼(PA)行为方面的有效性。方法:基于合理行动理论的背部护理计划是一项随机对照试验,在一家医疗服务中心进行。该试验比较了 TRA 构建与对照组的有效性。转诊到德黑兰沙希德-贝赫什提医科大学的 80 名患者被随机分配到基于 TRA 的干预组(40 人)或对照组(40 人)。结果显示:"组别 "与 "测试时间 "之间存在显著的交互效应(P0.05),干预组在 3 个月(P<0.001)和 6 个月(P<0.001)的随访中显示出与 PA 相关的行为有显著改善。与对照组(3.2±1.0)相比,干预组的 PA 行为平均得分(8.4±1.1)明显更高(p<0.001)。同样,干预组的疼痛强度(3.8±2.2)明显低于对照组(4.3±3.0)(P<0.001)。此外,干预组的腰椎活动范围测试技能也有明显改善(P<0.05)。结论:通过基于 TRA 框架的针对性教育策略,TRA-BAC 计划有望改善 cLBP 患者的 PA 相关行为并减轻疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effectiveness of a theory-based educational intervention on promoting physical activity-related behavior in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial based on health center (TRA -BAC)
Aims: this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) – based educational program in promoting physical activity (PA) behavior in Chronic low back pain (cLBP) patients.Methods: the Reasoned Action Theory-based Back Care program was a randomized controlled trial conducted at a Health Service Center. It compared the TRA construct’s effectiveness against a control group. Eighty patients referred to Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Tehran were randomly assigned to either the TRA-based intervention group (n=40) or the control group (n=40).Both groups completed self-reported questionnaires at baseline, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups. Additionally, a checklist was used to assess lumbar spine range of motion test skills using the modified Schober test.Results: a significant interaction effect was observed between “group” and “test time” factors (p<0.001). A total of 77 cLBP patients were evaluated, with a mean age of 41.0±4.2 years in the intervention group and 39.0±3.5 years in the control group. While both groups initially aligned with TRA constructs (p>0.05), the intervention group demonstrated significant improvements in PA-related behavior at both 3-month (p<0.001) and 6-month (p<0.001) follow-ups. The mean score for PA behavior in the intervention group (8.4 ± 1.1) was significantly higher compared to the control group (3.2±1.0) (p<0.001). Similarly, pain intensity was significantly lower in the intervention group (3.8±2.2) compared to the control group (4.3±3.0) (p<0.001). Furthermore, the intervention group showed a significant improvement in lumbar spine range of motion test skills (p<0.05). The lumbar spine range of motion test skills of the intervention group significantly decreased (p<0.05).Conclusions: the TRA-BAC program demonstrates promise in improving PA-related behavior and reducing pain in cLBP patients through targeted educational strategies based on the TRA framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信