改进物理入门课程的传统评分方法

Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1088/1361-6404/ad5808
Wittaya Kanchanapusakit, Pattarapon Tanalikhit
{"title":"改进物理入门课程的传统评分方法","authors":"Wittaya Kanchanapusakit, Pattarapon Tanalikhit","doi":"10.1088/1361-6404/ad5808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The evaluation in introductory physics courses follows a traditional approach where a letter grade, determined by the total score, is assigned to represent the student's overall performance. To enhance the meaningfulness of these grades, we supplement them with individual thinking proficiency profiles for each student. These profiles are derived from subscores attributed to particular exam questions, organized by the corresponding thinking skills. We report the average thinking proficiency profiles of all students and compare the average profiles among students from different grade groups. The objective is to aid instructors in identifying areas that may require improvement in the learning process.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"41 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing traditional grading in introductory physics courses\",\"authors\":\"Wittaya Kanchanapusakit, Pattarapon Tanalikhit\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6404/ad5808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The evaluation in introductory physics courses follows a traditional approach where a letter grade, determined by the total score, is assigned to represent the student's overall performance. To enhance the meaningfulness of these grades, we supplement them with individual thinking proficiency profiles for each student. These profiles are derived from subscores attributed to particular exam questions, organized by the corresponding thinking skills. We report the average thinking proficiency profiles of all students and compare the average profiles among students from different grade groups. The objective is to aid instructors in identifying areas that may require improvement in the learning process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":\"41 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ad5808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ad5808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

物理入门课程的评价采用传统方法,即根据总分确定字母等级,以代表学生的总体表现。为了增强这些成绩的意义,我们为每个学生补充了个人思维能力档案。这些概况是根据特定试题的子分数得出的,并按照相应的思维能力进行了整理。我们报告了所有学生的平均思维能力概况,并比较了不同年级组学生的平均概况。目的是帮助教师确定在学习过程中可能需要改进的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Enhancing traditional grading in introductory physics courses
The evaluation in introductory physics courses follows a traditional approach where a letter grade, determined by the total score, is assigned to represent the student's overall performance. To enhance the meaningfulness of these grades, we supplement them with individual thinking proficiency profiles for each student. These profiles are derived from subscores attributed to particular exam questions, organized by the corresponding thinking skills. We report the average thinking proficiency profiles of all students and compare the average profiles among students from different grade groups. The objective is to aid instructors in identifying areas that may require improvement in the learning process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信