Medijska i društvena polarizacija u vremenu krize: BH. mediji i rat u Ukrajini / Media and Social Polarization in a Time of Crisis: Bh.乌克兰的媒体与战争

Lejla Turčilo
{"title":"Medijska i društvena polarizacija u vremenu krize: BH. mediji i rat u Ukrajini / Media and Social Polarization in a Time of Crisis: Bh.乌克兰的媒体与战争","authors":"Lejla Turčilo","doi":"10.48052/19865244.2024.1.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the ways in which the media in Bosnia and Herzegovina in times of crisis relate to the already existing social polarization and the ways in which they further strengthen it. Theories of social polarization were used, with a special emphasis on interpretive polarization, in which the media play a crucial role. The focus of the research is reporting on the Ukrainian crisis, in order to consider the patterns that have developed in media reporting, especially when it comes to different approaches in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republika Srpska. The research is based on the method of content analysis and in-depth structured interviews with journalists, editors and political analysts. The sample consists of the 7 most read web portals from BiH: 4 from the Federation of BiH and 3 from the RS, and the corpus totals 50 texts. A search used the keywords: Ukraine, Russia, aggression, attack, invasion, war, and the analyzed period is seven days from the beginning of the attack on Ukraine (from February 24, 2022) and seven days from the date of the first anniversary of the attack on Ukraine (from February 24 .2023). Indicators for analysis are: how the media decide what is newsworthy, how the media choose sources, how the media verify information and how the media shape the story (with special reference to how they shape it in relation to the agenda they set and the public opinion they shape). The goal is to question how much the Ukrainian crisis was used by the media to further polarize B&H society, and the general conclusion is that media reporting only partially fulfills the key roles of providing comprehensive, clear information, contextualizing events and educating the public. The interpretation of the events is selective and in accordance with the dominant narratives and, as such, does not contribute to a complete understanding of the events, and even less to a high-quality social dialogue. As a post-conflict society, Bosnia and Herzegovina should have a much greater sensitivity to the events in Ukraine, and the media should approach this topic with much more attention, responsibility and public interest. This applies equally to the quantity and quality of information available to citizens.","PeriodicalId":143585,"journal":{"name":"Pregled: časopis za društvena pitanja / Periodical for social issues","volume":"55 32","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medijska i društvena polarizacija u vremenu krize: BH. mediji i rat u Ukrajini / Media and Social Polarization in a Time of Crisis: Bh. Media and War in Ukraine\",\"authors\":\"Lejla Turčilo\",\"doi\":\"10.48052/19865244.2024.1.31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the ways in which the media in Bosnia and Herzegovina in times of crisis relate to the already existing social polarization and the ways in which they further strengthen it. Theories of social polarization were used, with a special emphasis on interpretive polarization, in which the media play a crucial role. The focus of the research is reporting on the Ukrainian crisis, in order to consider the patterns that have developed in media reporting, especially when it comes to different approaches in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republika Srpska. The research is based on the method of content analysis and in-depth structured interviews with journalists, editors and political analysts. The sample consists of the 7 most read web portals from BiH: 4 from the Federation of BiH and 3 from the RS, and the corpus totals 50 texts. A search used the keywords: Ukraine, Russia, aggression, attack, invasion, war, and the analyzed period is seven days from the beginning of the attack on Ukraine (from February 24, 2022) and seven days from the date of the first anniversary of the attack on Ukraine (from February 24 .2023). Indicators for analysis are: how the media decide what is newsworthy, how the media choose sources, how the media verify information and how the media shape the story (with special reference to how they shape it in relation to the agenda they set and the public opinion they shape). The goal is to question how much the Ukrainian crisis was used by the media to further polarize B&H society, and the general conclusion is that media reporting only partially fulfills the key roles of providing comprehensive, clear information, contextualizing events and educating the public. The interpretation of the events is selective and in accordance with the dominant narratives and, as such, does not contribute to a complete understanding of the events, and even less to a high-quality social dialogue. As a post-conflict society, Bosnia and Herzegovina should have a much greater sensitivity to the events in Ukraine, and the media should approach this topic with much more attention, responsibility and public interest. This applies equally to the quantity and quality of information available to citizens.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pregled: časopis za društvena pitanja / Periodical for social issues\",\"volume\":\"55 32\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pregled: časopis za društvena pitanja / Periodical for social issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48052/19865244.2024.1.31\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pregled: časopis za društvena pitanja / Periodical for social issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48052/19865244.2024.1.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了危机时期波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的媒体与业已存在的社会两极分化的关系,以及媒体进一步加强社会两极分化的方式。文章采用了社会两极分化理论,并特别强调了解释性两极分化,而媒体在其中发挥着至关重要的作用。研究的重点是对乌克兰危机的报道,以便考虑媒体报道中形成的模式,特别是波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那联邦以及塞族共和国的不同做法。研究基于内容分析方法和对记者、编辑和政治分析家的深入结构性访谈。样本包括波黑阅读量最高的 7 个门户网站:4 个来自波黑联邦,3 个来自塞族共和国,语料库共有 50 个文本。搜索时使用了以下关键词乌克兰、俄罗斯、侵略、攻击、入侵、战争,分析时间段为攻击乌克兰开始后的七天(2022 年 2 月 24 日起)和攻击乌克兰一周年纪念日后的七天(2023 年 2 月 24 日起)。分析指标包括:媒体如何决定什么是有价值的新闻、媒体如何选择消息来源、媒体如何核实信息以及媒体如何塑造新闻(特别是媒体如何根据其设定的议程和塑造的舆论塑造新闻)。总的结论是,媒体报道仅部分地发挥了提供全面、清晰信息、介绍事件背景和教育公众的关键作用。对事件的解释是有选择性的,符合主流叙事,因此无助于对事件的全面了解,更无助于高质量的社会对话。作为一个冲突后社会,波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那应该对乌克兰事件有更高的敏感 度,媒体应该以更多的关注、责任和公众利益来处理这一主题。这同样适用于向公民提供信息的数量和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medijska i društvena polarizacija u vremenu krize: BH. mediji i rat u Ukrajini / Media and Social Polarization in a Time of Crisis: Bh. Media and War in Ukraine
This article examines the ways in which the media in Bosnia and Herzegovina in times of crisis relate to the already existing social polarization and the ways in which they further strengthen it. Theories of social polarization were used, with a special emphasis on interpretive polarization, in which the media play a crucial role. The focus of the research is reporting on the Ukrainian crisis, in order to consider the patterns that have developed in media reporting, especially when it comes to different approaches in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republika Srpska. The research is based on the method of content analysis and in-depth structured interviews with journalists, editors and political analysts. The sample consists of the 7 most read web portals from BiH: 4 from the Federation of BiH and 3 from the RS, and the corpus totals 50 texts. A search used the keywords: Ukraine, Russia, aggression, attack, invasion, war, and the analyzed period is seven days from the beginning of the attack on Ukraine (from February 24, 2022) and seven days from the date of the first anniversary of the attack on Ukraine (from February 24 .2023). Indicators for analysis are: how the media decide what is newsworthy, how the media choose sources, how the media verify information and how the media shape the story (with special reference to how they shape it in relation to the agenda they set and the public opinion they shape). The goal is to question how much the Ukrainian crisis was used by the media to further polarize B&H society, and the general conclusion is that media reporting only partially fulfills the key roles of providing comprehensive, clear information, contextualizing events and educating the public. The interpretation of the events is selective and in accordance with the dominant narratives and, as such, does not contribute to a complete understanding of the events, and even less to a high-quality social dialogue. As a post-conflict society, Bosnia and Herzegovina should have a much greater sensitivity to the events in Ukraine, and the media should approach this topic with much more attention, responsibility and public interest. This applies equally to the quantity and quality of information available to citizens.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信