经济学帝国主义的过去与现在：本-费恩：经济学与其他社会科学之间不断变化的关系

Q3 Social Sciences

Contributions to Political Economy Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1093/cpe/bzae012

Jamie Morgan

{"title":"经济学帝国主义的过去与现在：本-费恩：经济学与其他社会科学之间不断变化的关系","authors":"Jamie Morgan","doi":"10.1093/cpe/bzae012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this review essay, I explore the first two of a planned 10 volumes of Ben Fine’s selected journal publications. The two are broadly concerned with economics imperialism before and after a ‘watershed’ (before which it is recognised for what it is and after which it is less so). I first set out what Fine means by economics imperialism. I then discuss a few examples of what heterodox economists have been talking about insofar as they were not (quite) talking about economics imperialism. This provides a useful segue into the specifics of Fine’s writings across the two volumes, and in two subsections, I separately survey the volumes. Finally, I conclude with some comment on the sense of unfinished business that hangs over constructive change.","PeriodicalId":38730,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to Political Economy","volume":"2 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economics Imperialism then and now: Ben Fine on the Changing Relationship between Economics and the Other Social Sciences\",\"authors\":\"Jamie Morgan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/cpe/bzae012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In this review essay, I explore the first two of a planned 10 volumes of Ben Fine’s selected journal publications. The two are broadly concerned with economics imperialism before and after a ‘watershed’ (before which it is recognised for what it is and after which it is less so). I first set out what Fine means by economics imperialism. I then discuss a few examples of what heterodox economists have been talking about insofar as they were not (quite) talking about economics imperialism. This provides a useful segue into the specifics of Fine’s writings across the two volumes, and in two subsections, I separately survey the volumes. Finally, I conclude with some comment on the sense of unfinished business that hangs over constructive change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contributions to Political Economy\",\"volume\":\"2 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contributions to Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/cpe/bzae012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cpe/bzae012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇评论文章中，我探讨了本-费恩计划出版的 10 卷期刊选集中的前两卷。这两卷大致涉及 "分水岭 "前后的经济学帝国主义（在 "分水岭 "之前，经济学帝国主义的本质得到认可，而在 "分水岭 "之后，经济学帝国主义的本质则不那么被认可）。我首先阐述了 Fine 所说的经济学帝国主义的含义。然后，我将举例说明异端经济学家一直在谈论的经济学帝国主义，因为他们并没有（完全）谈论经济学帝国主义。这为费恩两卷著作的具体内容提供了一个有用的切入点，在两个小节中，我分别对两卷著作进行了梳理。最后，我将对笼罩在建设性变革之上的未竟事业感发表一些评论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Economics Imperialism then and now: Ben Fine on the Changing Relationship between Economics and the Other Social Sciences

In this review essay, I explore the first two of a planned 10 volumes of Ben Fine’s selected journal publications. The two are broadly concerned with economics imperialism before and after a ‘watershed’ (before which it is recognised for what it is and after which it is less so). I first set out what Fine means by economics imperialism. I then discuss a few examples of what heterodox economists have been talking about insofar as they were not (quite) talking about economics imperialism. This provides a useful segue into the specifics of Fine’s writings across the two volumes, and in two subsections, I separately survey the volumes. Finally, I conclude with some comment on the sense of unfinished business that hangs over constructive change.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Contributions to Political Economy Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Contributions to Political Economy provides a forum for the academic discussion of original ideas and arguments drawn from important critical traditions in economic analysis. Articles fall broadly within the lines of thought associated with the work of the Classical political economists, Marx, Keynes, and Sraffa. While the majority of articles are theoretical and historical in emphasis, the journal welcomes articles of a more applied character. It also reviews noteworthy books recently published.