前列腺癌患者的Ga-68 PSMA PET衍生原发肿瘤基线参数及其与临床风险分层和临床病理特征的关系

IF 0.6 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Özge Vural Topuz, A. Aksu
{"title":"前列腺癌患者的Ga-68 PSMA PET衍生原发肿瘤基线参数及其与临床风险分层和临床病理特征的关系","authors":"Özge Vural Topuz, A. Aksu","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aim  This article evaluates whether parameters derived from the gallium-68-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ( 68 Ga-PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging studies of primary prostate cancer (PCa) lesions were associated with Gleason score (GS), D'Amico risk class, Candiolo nomograms, and the metastatic status of the disease. Methods  We retrospectively evaluated newly diagnosed PCa patients who underwent 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT before therapy. Age, baseline serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and metastatic status were recorded. Maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean SUV (SUVmean), total lesion PSMA (TL-PSMA), and PSMA-derived tumor volume (PSMA-TV) were analyzed. The patients were grouped according to GS (GS ≤ 7 and GS ≥ 8), D'Amico risk classes (low intermediate and high-risk), and also based on their results with the Candiolo nomogram which normally creates five risk classes. For Candiolo classes, very-low risk and low-risk patients were pooled into the low-risk Candiolo (LRC) group, high and very high-risk patients were pooled into the high-risk Candiolo (HRC) group. The intermediate-risk Candiolo group was utilized as-is (IRC). Results  Mean age was 67 ± 8 years, median PSA value was 14.3 (3–211). There were 82 patients with GS ≤ 7 and 38 patients with GS ≥ 8; intermediate D'Amico class comprised 32 patients, while the high D'Amico class comprised 88 patients. For Candiolo, there were 23 LRC, 40 IRC, and 57 HRC patients. PSMA-positive metastases were detected in 44 (36.7%) patients. The SUVmean, SUVmax, PSMA-TV, and TL-PSMA values of the primary tumor demonstrated significant differences when compared according to classifications for GS, D'Amico, LRC versus HRC, and metastatic versus nonmetastatic patients. Of note, TL-PSMA was the only parameter that varied significantly among all risk groups. Conclusion  Primary tumor parameters obtained from baseline 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT are useful to distinguish PCa patients in terms of GS, D'Amico, Candiolo nomogram, and metastatic states. TL-PSMA appears to be the best parameter as it is the only parameter that can distinguish all risk groups from each other.","PeriodicalId":23742,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Baseline Ga-68 PSMA PET-Derived Primary Tumor Parameters in Patients with Prostate Cancer and Their Association with Clinical Risk Stratification and Clinicopathologic Features\",\"authors\":\"Özge Vural Topuz, A. Aksu\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1787733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Aim  This article evaluates whether parameters derived from the gallium-68-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ( 68 Ga-PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging studies of primary prostate cancer (PCa) lesions were associated with Gleason score (GS), D'Amico risk class, Candiolo nomograms, and the metastatic status of the disease. Methods  We retrospectively evaluated newly diagnosed PCa patients who underwent 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT before therapy. Age, baseline serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and metastatic status were recorded. Maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean SUV (SUVmean), total lesion PSMA (TL-PSMA), and PSMA-derived tumor volume (PSMA-TV) were analyzed. The patients were grouped according to GS (GS ≤ 7 and GS ≥ 8), D'Amico risk classes (low intermediate and high-risk), and also based on their results with the Candiolo nomogram which normally creates five risk classes. For Candiolo classes, very-low risk and low-risk patients were pooled into the low-risk Candiolo (LRC) group, high and very high-risk patients were pooled into the high-risk Candiolo (HRC) group. The intermediate-risk Candiolo group was utilized as-is (IRC). Results  Mean age was 67 ± 8 years, median PSA value was 14.3 (3–211). There were 82 patients with GS ≤ 7 and 38 patients with GS ≥ 8; intermediate D'Amico class comprised 32 patients, while the high D'Amico class comprised 88 patients. For Candiolo, there were 23 LRC, 40 IRC, and 57 HRC patients. PSMA-positive metastases were detected in 44 (36.7%) patients. The SUVmean, SUVmax, PSMA-TV, and TL-PSMA values of the primary tumor demonstrated significant differences when compared according to classifications for GS, D'Amico, LRC versus HRC, and metastatic versus nonmetastatic patients. Of note, TL-PSMA was the only parameter that varied significantly among all risk groups. Conclusion  Primary tumor parameters obtained from baseline 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT are useful to distinguish PCa patients in terms of GS, D'Amico, Candiolo nomogram, and metastatic states. TL-PSMA appears to be the best parameter as it is the only parameter that can distinguish all risk groups from each other.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787733\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 目的 本文评估了原发性前列腺癌(PCa)病灶的镓-68标记前列腺特异性膜抗原(68 Ga-PSMA)正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)成像研究得出的参数是否与格里森评分(GS)、D'Amico风险分级、Candiolo提名图和疾病的转移状态相关。方法 我们对治疗前接受 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT 检查的新诊断 PCa 患者进行了回顾性评估。记录了年龄、基线血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和转移状态。对最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)、平均 SUV 值(SUVmean)、病变 PSMA 总量(TL-PSMA)和 PSMA 衍生肿瘤体积(PSMA-TV)进行了分析。根据 GS(GS ≤ 7 和 GS ≥ 8)、D'Amico 风险等级(低、中、高风险)以及坎迪奥罗提名图(通常分为五个风险等级)的结果对患者进行分组。在 Candiolo 等级中,极低危和低危患者被归入低危 Candiolo(LRC)组,高危和极高危患者被归入高危 Candiolo(HRC)组。中危坎迪奥罗组按原样使用(IRC)。结果 平均年龄为 67 ± 8 岁,PSA 中位值为 14.3(3-211)。82名患者的GS值≤7,38名患者的GS值≥8;中度D'Amico分级包括32名患者,高度D'Amico分级包括88名患者。坎迪奥罗有 23 名 LRC 患者、40 名 IRC 患者和 57 名 HRC 患者。在 44 例(36.7%)患者中检测到 PSMA 阳性转移灶。原发肿瘤的 SUVmean、SUVmax、PSMA-TV 和 TL-PSMA 值在根据 GS、D'Amico、LRC 与 HRC 以及转移与非转移患者的分类进行比较时显示出显著差异。值得注意的是,TL-PSMA 是所有风险组别中唯一存在显著差异的参数。结论 从基线68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT中获得的原发肿瘤参数有助于区分PCa患者的GS、D'Amico、Candiolo提名图和转移状态。TL-PSMA似乎是最佳参数,因为它是唯一能区分所有风险组别的参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Baseline Ga-68 PSMA PET-Derived Primary Tumor Parameters in Patients with Prostate Cancer and Their Association with Clinical Risk Stratification and Clinicopathologic Features
Abstract Aim  This article evaluates whether parameters derived from the gallium-68-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ( 68 Ga-PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging studies of primary prostate cancer (PCa) lesions were associated with Gleason score (GS), D'Amico risk class, Candiolo nomograms, and the metastatic status of the disease. Methods  We retrospectively evaluated newly diagnosed PCa patients who underwent 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT before therapy. Age, baseline serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and metastatic status were recorded. Maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean SUV (SUVmean), total lesion PSMA (TL-PSMA), and PSMA-derived tumor volume (PSMA-TV) were analyzed. The patients were grouped according to GS (GS ≤ 7 and GS ≥ 8), D'Amico risk classes (low intermediate and high-risk), and also based on their results with the Candiolo nomogram which normally creates five risk classes. For Candiolo classes, very-low risk and low-risk patients were pooled into the low-risk Candiolo (LRC) group, high and very high-risk patients were pooled into the high-risk Candiolo (HRC) group. The intermediate-risk Candiolo group was utilized as-is (IRC). Results  Mean age was 67 ± 8 years, median PSA value was 14.3 (3–211). There were 82 patients with GS ≤ 7 and 38 patients with GS ≥ 8; intermediate D'Amico class comprised 32 patients, while the high D'Amico class comprised 88 patients. For Candiolo, there were 23 LRC, 40 IRC, and 57 HRC patients. PSMA-positive metastases were detected in 44 (36.7%) patients. The SUVmean, SUVmax, PSMA-TV, and TL-PSMA values of the primary tumor demonstrated significant differences when compared according to classifications for GS, D'Amico, LRC versus HRC, and metastatic versus nonmetastatic patients. Of note, TL-PSMA was the only parameter that varied significantly among all risk groups. Conclusion  Primary tumor parameters obtained from baseline 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT are useful to distinguish PCa patients in terms of GS, D'Amico, Candiolo nomogram, and metastatic states. TL-PSMA appears to be the best parameter as it is the only parameter that can distinguish all risk groups from each other.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Nuclear Medicine
World Journal of Nuclear Medicine RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
16.70%
发文量
118
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信