不同规模指标的比较和岩体分类的验证

Yuan Hong, Feifei Zhou, Changjun Li, Ming Li, Chengkun Qu
{"title":"不同规模指标的比较和岩体分类的验证","authors":"Yuan Hong, Feifei Zhou, Changjun Li, Ming Li, Chengkun Qu","doi":"10.1088/2631-8695/ad58a6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The basic principle of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is introduced, and different scales of determining indicator weights using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) are summarized and organized. The inspection indicators for evaluating the quality of the judgment matrix are provided. Taking the underground station of a planned intercity railway as the engineering background, a comparative study is conducted on the advantages and disadvantages of the indicator judgment matrix and the comprehensive evaluation results about an scale, 10/10~18/2 scale, 9/9~9/1 scale, 1~9 scale. The results show that the consistency of the judgment matrix constructed by 1-9 scale is poor and may lead to incorrect evaluation results. The consistency of judgment matrix constructed by an scale is optimal and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation results are the closest to the actual situation. It can provide useful guidance for the classification work of surrounding rocks in underground engineering projects.","PeriodicalId":505725,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Research Express","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of different scale indicators and verification of rock mass classification\",\"authors\":\"Yuan Hong, Feifei Zhou, Changjun Li, Ming Li, Chengkun Qu\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2631-8695/ad58a6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The basic principle of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is introduced, and different scales of determining indicator weights using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) are summarized and organized. The inspection indicators for evaluating the quality of the judgment matrix are provided. Taking the underground station of a planned intercity railway as the engineering background, a comparative study is conducted on the advantages and disadvantages of the indicator judgment matrix and the comprehensive evaluation results about an scale, 10/10~18/2 scale, 9/9~9/1 scale, 1~9 scale. The results show that the consistency of the judgment matrix constructed by 1-9 scale is poor and may lead to incorrect evaluation results. The consistency of judgment matrix constructed by an scale is optimal and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation results are the closest to the actual situation. It can provide useful guidance for the classification work of surrounding rocks in underground engineering projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Research Express\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Research Express\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ad58a6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Research Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ad58a6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍了模糊综合评价的基本原理,总结并整理了利用层次分析法(AHP)确定指标权重的不同尺度。提供了评价判断矩阵质量的检验指标。以规划中的城际铁路地下车站为工程背景,比较研究了指标判断矩阵的优缺点和综合评价结果,分别为 1 标度、10/10~18/2 标度、9/9~9/1 标度、1~9 标度。结果表明,用 1-9 标度构建的判断矩阵一致性较差,可能导致评价结果错误。而按 1 比例构建的判断矩阵一致性最佳,模糊综合评价结果最接近实际情况。它可以为地下工程围岩分类工作提供有益的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of different scale indicators and verification of rock mass classification
The basic principle of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is introduced, and different scales of determining indicator weights using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) are summarized and organized. The inspection indicators for evaluating the quality of the judgment matrix are provided. Taking the underground station of a planned intercity railway as the engineering background, a comparative study is conducted on the advantages and disadvantages of the indicator judgment matrix and the comprehensive evaluation results about an scale, 10/10~18/2 scale, 9/9~9/1 scale, 1~9 scale. The results show that the consistency of the judgment matrix constructed by 1-9 scale is poor and may lead to incorrect evaluation results. The consistency of judgment matrix constructed by an scale is optimal and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation results are the closest to the actual situation. It can provide useful guidance for the classification work of surrounding rocks in underground engineering projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信