感知支持与人工智能素养:心理需求满足的中介作用

Yanyan Shen, Wencheng Cui
{"title":"感知支持与人工智能素养:心理需求满足的中介作用","authors":"Yanyan Shen, Wencheng Cui","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1415248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) exerts significant influence on both professional and personal spheres, underscoring the necessity for college students to have a fundamental understanding of AI. Guided by self-determination theory (SDT), this study explores the influence of psychological needs satisfaction on AI literacy among university students. A cross-sectional survey involving 445 university students from diverse academic backgrounds was conducted. The survey assessed the mediation effect of students’ psychological need satisfaction between two types of support—technical and teacher—and AI literacy. The results indicate that both support types positively influenced the fulfillment of autonomy and competence needs, which subsequently acted as mediators in enhancing AI literacy. However, the satisfaction of relatedness needs did not mediate the relationship between the types of support and AI literacy. Unexpectedly, no direct association was found between the two forms of support and AI literacy levels among students. The findings suggest that although technical and teacher support contribute to fulfilling specific psychological needs, only autonomy and competence needs are predictive of AI literacy. The lack of direct impact of support on AI literacy underscores the importance of addressing specific psychological needs through educational interventions. It is recommended that educators provide tailored support in AI education (AIEd) and that institutions develop specialized courses to enhance AI literacy.","PeriodicalId":507929,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"27 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived support and AI literacy: the mediating role of psychological needs satisfaction\",\"authors\":\"Yanyan Shen, Wencheng Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1415248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Artificial Intelligence (AI) exerts significant influence on both professional and personal spheres, underscoring the necessity for college students to have a fundamental understanding of AI. Guided by self-determination theory (SDT), this study explores the influence of psychological needs satisfaction on AI literacy among university students. A cross-sectional survey involving 445 university students from diverse academic backgrounds was conducted. The survey assessed the mediation effect of students’ psychological need satisfaction between two types of support—technical and teacher—and AI literacy. The results indicate that both support types positively influenced the fulfillment of autonomy and competence needs, which subsequently acted as mediators in enhancing AI literacy. However, the satisfaction of relatedness needs did not mediate the relationship between the types of support and AI literacy. Unexpectedly, no direct association was found between the two forms of support and AI literacy levels among students. The findings suggest that although technical and teacher support contribute to fulfilling specific psychological needs, only autonomy and competence needs are predictive of AI literacy. The lack of direct impact of support on AI literacy underscores the importance of addressing specific psychological needs through educational interventions. It is recommended that educators provide tailored support in AI education (AIEd) and that institutions develop specialized courses to enhance AI literacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"27 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1415248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1415248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)对职业和个人领域都有重大影响,因此大学生有必要对人工智能有基本的了解。本研究以自我决定理论(SDT)为指导,探讨心理需求满足对大学生人工智能素养的影响。本研究进行了一项横断面调查,涉及 445 名来自不同学术背景的大学生。调查评估了学生的心理需求满意度在技术和教师两种支持类型与人工智能素养之间的中介效应。结果表明,两种支持类型都对自主性需求和能力需求的满足产生了积极影响,而自主性需求和能力需求又是提高人工智能素养的中介。然而,相关性需求的满足并没有调解支持类型与人工智能素养之间的关系。出乎意料的是,两种支持形式与学生的人工智能素养水平之间没有直接联系。研究结果表明,尽管技术支持和教师支持有助于满足特定的心理需求,但只有自主和能力需求能预测人工智能素养。支持对人工智能素养缺乏直接影响,这凸显了通过教育干预满足特定心理需求的重要性。建议教育工作者在人工智能教育(AIEd)中提供有针对性的支持,并建议各机构开发专门课程以提高人工智能素养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceived support and AI literacy: the mediating role of psychological needs satisfaction
Artificial Intelligence (AI) exerts significant influence on both professional and personal spheres, underscoring the necessity for college students to have a fundamental understanding of AI. Guided by self-determination theory (SDT), this study explores the influence of psychological needs satisfaction on AI literacy among university students. A cross-sectional survey involving 445 university students from diverse academic backgrounds was conducted. The survey assessed the mediation effect of students’ psychological need satisfaction between two types of support—technical and teacher—and AI literacy. The results indicate that both support types positively influenced the fulfillment of autonomy and competence needs, which subsequently acted as mediators in enhancing AI literacy. However, the satisfaction of relatedness needs did not mediate the relationship between the types of support and AI literacy. Unexpectedly, no direct association was found between the two forms of support and AI literacy levels among students. The findings suggest that although technical and teacher support contribute to fulfilling specific psychological needs, only autonomy and competence needs are predictive of AI literacy. The lack of direct impact of support on AI literacy underscores the importance of addressing specific psychological needs through educational interventions. It is recommended that educators provide tailored support in AI education (AIEd) and that institutions develop specialized courses to enhance AI literacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信