孕前补充多种微量营养素与补充铁-叶酸对发展中国家妇女孕产结局的影响:系统回顾与荟萃分析

Rashmi Ranjan Das, Jhuma Sankar, N. Jaiswal, B. Dwibedi, A. Satapathy, Pranita Pradhan, Prajyoti Sahu
{"title":"孕前补充多种微量营养素与补充铁-叶酸对发展中国家妇女孕产结局的影响:系统回顾与荟萃分析","authors":"Rashmi Ranjan Das, Jhuma Sankar, N. Jaiswal, B. Dwibedi, A. Satapathy, Pranita Pradhan, Prajyoti Sahu","doi":"10.3389/fnut.2024.1390661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maternal malnutrition affects the somatic growth of the fetus and subsequent adverse events during infancy and childhood period. Though trials have been conducted on multiple micronutrient (MMN) supplements initiated during the preconception period, there is no collated evidence on this.We performed a systematic review of published trials with the application of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). The searches were conducted until 30 September 2023. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5 software. The primary objective was to compare the effect of preconception MMN vs. iron–folic acid (IFA) supplementation on newborn anthropometric parameters at birth.Of the 11,832 total citations retrieved, 12 studies with data from 11,391 participants [Intervention = 5,767; Control = 5,624] were included. For the primary outcome, there was no significant difference in the birth weight [MD, 35.61 (95% CI, −7.83 to 79.06), p = 0.11], birth length [MD, 0.19 (95% CI, −0.03 to 0.42), p = 0.09], and head circumference [MD, −0.25 (95% CI, −0.64 to −0.14), p = 0.22] between the MMN and control groups. For all the secondary outcomes [except for small for gestational age (SGA) and low birth weight (LBW)], the difference between the MMN and control groups was not significant. The GRADE evidence generated for all the outcomes varied from “very low to moderate certainty.”A “very low certainty” of evidence suggests that MMN supplementation may not be better than routine IFA supplementation in improving newborn anthropometric parameters (weight, length, and head circumference). The adverse events resulting from the supplementation were not significant. We need better quality uniformly designed RCTs before any firm recommendation can be made.Systematic review registration: identifier (CRD42019144878: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#searchadvanced).","PeriodicalId":505031,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Nutrition","volume":"35 27","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of preconception multiple micronutrients vs. iron–folic acid supplementation on maternal and birth outcomes among women from developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Rashmi Ranjan Das, Jhuma Sankar, N. Jaiswal, B. Dwibedi, A. Satapathy, Pranita Pradhan, Prajyoti Sahu\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnut.2024.1390661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Maternal malnutrition affects the somatic growth of the fetus and subsequent adverse events during infancy and childhood period. Though trials have been conducted on multiple micronutrient (MMN) supplements initiated during the preconception period, there is no collated evidence on this.We performed a systematic review of published trials with the application of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). The searches were conducted until 30 September 2023. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5 software. The primary objective was to compare the effect of preconception MMN vs. iron–folic acid (IFA) supplementation on newborn anthropometric parameters at birth.Of the 11,832 total citations retrieved, 12 studies with data from 11,391 participants [Intervention = 5,767; Control = 5,624] were included. For the primary outcome, there was no significant difference in the birth weight [MD, 35.61 (95% CI, −7.83 to 79.06), p = 0.11], birth length [MD, 0.19 (95% CI, −0.03 to 0.42), p = 0.09], and head circumference [MD, −0.25 (95% CI, −0.64 to −0.14), p = 0.22] between the MMN and control groups. For all the secondary outcomes [except for small for gestational age (SGA) and low birth weight (LBW)], the difference between the MMN and control groups was not significant. The GRADE evidence generated for all the outcomes varied from “very low to moderate certainty.”A “very low certainty” of evidence suggests that MMN supplementation may not be better than routine IFA supplementation in improving newborn anthropometric parameters (weight, length, and head circumference). The adverse events resulting from the supplementation were not significant. We need better quality uniformly designed RCTs before any firm recommendation can be made.Systematic review registration: identifier (CRD42019144878: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#searchadvanced).\",\"PeriodicalId\":505031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"35 27\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1390661\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1390661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

孕产妇营养不良会影响胎儿的躯体发育,进而影响婴幼儿时期的不良事件。我们采用建议评估、发展和评价分级法(GRADE)对已发表的试验进行了系统综述。检索截止到 2023 年 9 月 30 日。使用Review Manager 5软件进行了元分析。主要目的是比较孕前补充 MMN 与补充铁-叶酸 (IFA) 对新生儿出生时人体测量参数的影响。在检索到的 11,832 篇引文中,有 12 项研究纳入了 11,391 名参与者的数据[干预=5,767;对照=5,624]。在主要结果方面,MMN组和对照组的出生体重[MD,35.61(95% CI,-7.83至79.06),P = 0.11]、出生身长[MD,0.19(95% CI,-0.03至0.42),P = 0.09]和头围[MD,-0.25(95% CI,-0.64至-0.14),P = 0.22]没有显著差异。在所有次要结果中[除胎龄小(SGA)和出生体重不足(LBW)外],MMN组和对照组之间的差异不显著。所有结果的 GRADE 证据从 "非常低确定性 "到 "中等确定性 "不等。"非常低确定性 "的证据表明,在改善新生儿人体测量参数(体重、身长和头围)方面,补充 MMN 可能不如常规补充 IFA。补充剂导致的不良事件并不显著。我们需要质量更高的统一设计的 RCT,然后才能提出任何明确的建议。系统综述注册:标识符(CRD42019144878:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#searchadvanced)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of preconception multiple micronutrients vs. iron–folic acid supplementation on maternal and birth outcomes among women from developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Maternal malnutrition affects the somatic growth of the fetus and subsequent adverse events during infancy and childhood period. Though trials have been conducted on multiple micronutrient (MMN) supplements initiated during the preconception period, there is no collated evidence on this.We performed a systematic review of published trials with the application of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). The searches were conducted until 30 September 2023. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5 software. The primary objective was to compare the effect of preconception MMN vs. iron–folic acid (IFA) supplementation on newborn anthropometric parameters at birth.Of the 11,832 total citations retrieved, 12 studies with data from 11,391 participants [Intervention = 5,767; Control = 5,624] were included. For the primary outcome, there was no significant difference in the birth weight [MD, 35.61 (95% CI, −7.83 to 79.06), p = 0.11], birth length [MD, 0.19 (95% CI, −0.03 to 0.42), p = 0.09], and head circumference [MD, −0.25 (95% CI, −0.64 to −0.14), p = 0.22] between the MMN and control groups. For all the secondary outcomes [except for small for gestational age (SGA) and low birth weight (LBW)], the difference between the MMN and control groups was not significant. The GRADE evidence generated for all the outcomes varied from “very low to moderate certainty.”A “very low certainty” of evidence suggests that MMN supplementation may not be better than routine IFA supplementation in improving newborn anthropometric parameters (weight, length, and head circumference). The adverse events resulting from the supplementation were not significant. We need better quality uniformly designed RCTs before any firm recommendation can be made.Systematic review registration: identifier (CRD42019144878: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#searchadvanced).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信