如果我的老板不那么通情达理,我真不知道该怎么办":工作场所对照顾者的支持以及直线经理和同事在调解非正式灵活性中的作用

IF 5.4 2区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
M. Fahy, L. Dowling-Hetherington, D. Phillips, B. Moloney, C. Duffy, G. Paul, G. Fealy, T. Kroll, A. Lafferty
{"title":"如果我的老板不那么通情达理,我真不知道该怎么办\":工作场所对照顾者的支持以及直线经理和同事在调解非正式灵活性中的作用","authors":"M. Fahy,&nbsp;L. Dowling-Hetherington,&nbsp;D. Phillips,&nbsp;B. Moloney,&nbsp;C. Duffy,&nbsp;G. Paul,&nbsp;G. Fealy,&nbsp;T. Kroll,&nbsp;A. Lafferty","doi":"10.1111/1748-8583.12566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most employees will experience at least one episode of caregiving during their working lives. While work is important for carers' identity and well-being, the increasing complexity of caregiving situations and the often unpredictable needs of care recipients means that working carers may need to informally adjust when, where and how they work. The manner in which this informal flexibility is enacted is not well understood. Using a qualitative research design, this paper provides an insight into employees' experiences of combining work and caregiving and gives voice to working carers and the daily struggles they face. Drawing on the literature on work-family conflict (WFC) theory, signalling theory and flexible working, our research highlights the importance of informal flexibility, and the mediating role of line managers and co-workers in providing access to this flexibility. We identify the enabling mechanisms, or explicit signals of support, through which carer-friendly informal flexibility is enacted, namely: reassurance and pre-emptive support; carer advocacy; and idiosyncratic deal-making (i-deals). We argue that when these enabling mechanisms are in place, WFC is alleviated and attachment to the workforce is facilitated. Where the enabling mechanisms are not accessible, WFC increases and attachment to the workforce is hindered.</p>","PeriodicalId":47916,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Management Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"302-318"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1748-8583.12566","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘If my boss wasn't so accommodating, I don't know what I would do’: Workplace supports for carers and the role of line managers and co-workers in mediating informal flexibility\",\"authors\":\"M. Fahy,&nbsp;L. Dowling-Hetherington,&nbsp;D. Phillips,&nbsp;B. Moloney,&nbsp;C. Duffy,&nbsp;G. Paul,&nbsp;G. Fealy,&nbsp;T. Kroll,&nbsp;A. Lafferty\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1748-8583.12566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Most employees will experience at least one episode of caregiving during their working lives. While work is important for carers' identity and well-being, the increasing complexity of caregiving situations and the often unpredictable needs of care recipients means that working carers may need to informally adjust when, where and how they work. The manner in which this informal flexibility is enacted is not well understood. Using a qualitative research design, this paper provides an insight into employees' experiences of combining work and caregiving and gives voice to working carers and the daily struggles they face. Drawing on the literature on work-family conflict (WFC) theory, signalling theory and flexible working, our research highlights the importance of informal flexibility, and the mediating role of line managers and co-workers in providing access to this flexibility. We identify the enabling mechanisms, or explicit signals of support, through which carer-friendly informal flexibility is enacted, namely: reassurance and pre-emptive support; carer advocacy; and idiosyncratic deal-making (i-deals). We argue that when these enabling mechanisms are in place, WFC is alleviated and attachment to the workforce is facilitated. Where the enabling mechanisms are not accessible, WFC increases and attachment to the workforce is hindered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Resource Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"302-318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1748-8583.12566\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Resource Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1748-8583.12566\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1748-8583.12566","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数员工在其工作生涯中至少会经历一次照顾他人的经历。虽然工作对照护者的身份和福祉非常重要,但照护情况的日益复杂性以及照护对象往往无法预测的需求,意味着在职照护者可能需要非正式地调整他们工作的时间、地点和方式。这种非正式的灵活性是如何实现的,目前还不甚了解。本文采用定性研究设计,深入探讨了员工在兼顾工作和照顾他人方面的经验,并为在职照顾者及其面临的日常困境提供了发言权。我们的研究借鉴了有关工作与家庭冲突(WFC)理论、信号理论和弹性工作制的文献,强调了非正式灵活性的重要性,以及直线经理和同事在提供这种灵活性方面的中介作用。我们确定了支持性机制或明确的支持信号,通过这些机制,护工友好型非正式灵活性得以实现,即:保证和先发制人的支持;护工倡导;以及特异性交易(i-deals)。我们认为,当这些有利机制到位时,WFC 会得到缓解,并促进对劳动力的依恋。如果无法利用这些有利机制,WFC 就会增加,对劳动力的依恋就会受到阻碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

‘If my boss wasn't so accommodating, I don't know what I would do’: Workplace supports for carers and the role of line managers and co-workers in mediating informal flexibility

‘If my boss wasn't so accommodating, I don't know what I would do’: Workplace supports for carers and the role of line managers and co-workers in mediating informal flexibility

Most employees will experience at least one episode of caregiving during their working lives. While work is important for carers' identity and well-being, the increasing complexity of caregiving situations and the often unpredictable needs of care recipients means that working carers may need to informally adjust when, where and how they work. The manner in which this informal flexibility is enacted is not well understood. Using a qualitative research design, this paper provides an insight into employees' experiences of combining work and caregiving and gives voice to working carers and the daily struggles they face. Drawing on the literature on work-family conflict (WFC) theory, signalling theory and flexible working, our research highlights the importance of informal flexibility, and the mediating role of line managers and co-workers in providing access to this flexibility. We identify the enabling mechanisms, or explicit signals of support, through which carer-friendly informal flexibility is enacted, namely: reassurance and pre-emptive support; carer advocacy; and idiosyncratic deal-making (i-deals). We argue that when these enabling mechanisms are in place, WFC is alleviated and attachment to the workforce is facilitated. Where the enabling mechanisms are not accessible, WFC increases and attachment to the workforce is hindered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.90%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Human Resource Management Journal (CABS/AJG 4*) is a globally orientated HRM journal that promotes the understanding of human resource management to academics and practicing managers. We provide an international forum for discussion and debate, and stress the critical importance of people management to wider economic, political and social concerns. Endorsed by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, HRMJ is essential reading for everyone involved in personnel management, training, industrial relations, employment and human resource management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信