在前交叉韧带重建手术(ERAS)中,比较鞘内高压罗哌卡因和高压布比卡因在增强术后恢复(ERAS)方面的疗效

N. Panse, Noopur Dasmit Singh, Payoja Narendra Khadpekar, Varun Raj Dubey
{"title":"在前交叉韧带重建手术(ERAS)中,比较鞘内高压罗哌卡因和高压布比卡因在增强术后恢复(ERAS)方面的疗效","authors":"N. Panse, Noopur Dasmit Singh, Payoja Narendra Khadpekar, Varun Raj Dubey","doi":"10.18231/j.ijca.2024.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Bupivacaine is the drug of choice in spinal anaesthesia (SA), while Ropivacaine with its comparatively shorter duration of motor block allows early mobilization post ACL reconstruction surgery which is a crucial factor in Early Recovery after Surgery. : In this randomized double-blind comparative study of a total of 60 patients irrespective of gender undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery were studied. After Administration of SA to group R (2.5ml of 0.75% Heavy Ropivacaine) & group B (2.5ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine) both were compared for their post-operative effects with Bromage score, Aldrete score & Visual Analogue Score. : The time required for complete regression of motor blockade in group R (144.5+26.1 mins) < group B (181±21.3mins) which allowed for early mobilization which over all provides better and faster recovery.: Hyperbaric Ropivacaine when compared to Bupivacaine promises better results in terms of early ambulation and intraoperative hemodynamic stability promoting ERAS in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction surgeries. Promoting ERAS policy will reduce the duration of hospital stay, thereby improving the cost-effectiveness of health services.","PeriodicalId":13310,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia","volume":"7 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of efficacy of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine and hyperbaric bupivacaine in terms of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for ACL reconstructions\",\"authors\":\"N. Panse, Noopur Dasmit Singh, Payoja Narendra Khadpekar, Varun Raj Dubey\",\"doi\":\"10.18231/j.ijca.2024.031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Bupivacaine is the drug of choice in spinal anaesthesia (SA), while Ropivacaine with its comparatively shorter duration of motor block allows early mobilization post ACL reconstruction surgery which is a crucial factor in Early Recovery after Surgery. : In this randomized double-blind comparative study of a total of 60 patients irrespective of gender undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery were studied. After Administration of SA to group R (2.5ml of 0.75% Heavy Ropivacaine) & group B (2.5ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine) both were compared for their post-operative effects with Bromage score, Aldrete score & Visual Analogue Score. : The time required for complete regression of motor blockade in group R (144.5+26.1 mins) < group B (181±21.3mins) which allowed for early mobilization which over all provides better and faster recovery.: Hyperbaric Ropivacaine when compared to Bupivacaine promises better results in terms of early ambulation and intraoperative hemodynamic stability promoting ERAS in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction surgeries. Promoting ERAS policy will reduce the duration of hospital stay, thereby improving the cost-effectiveness of health services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"7 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2024.031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2024.031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

:布比卡因是脊髓麻醉(SA)的首选药物,而罗比卡因的运动阻滞持续时间相对较短,可以在前交叉韧带重建手术后尽早活动,这是术后早期恢复的关键因素。 在这项随机双盲对比研究中,共有 60 名患者(不分男女)接受了前交叉韧带重建手术。R 组(2.5 毫升 0.75% 重型罗哌卡因)和 B 组(2.5 毫升 0.5% 布比卡因)在使用 SA 后,通过 Bromage 评分、Aldrete 评分和视觉模拟评分比较两组的术后效果。 R 组运动阻滞完全消退所需时间(144.5+26.1 分钟)< B 组(181±21.3 分钟),这使得患者可以尽早活动,从而更好更快地恢复:与布比卡因相比,高压氧罗哌卡因可使接受前交叉韧带重建手术的患者在早期活动和术中血流动力学稳定方面获得更好的效果,从而促进ERAS。推广 ERAS 政策将缩短住院时间,从而提高医疗服务的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of efficacy of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine and hyperbaric bupivacaine in terms of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for ACL reconstructions
: Bupivacaine is the drug of choice in spinal anaesthesia (SA), while Ropivacaine with its comparatively shorter duration of motor block allows early mobilization post ACL reconstruction surgery which is a crucial factor in Early Recovery after Surgery. : In this randomized double-blind comparative study of a total of 60 patients irrespective of gender undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery were studied. After Administration of SA to group R (2.5ml of 0.75% Heavy Ropivacaine) & group B (2.5ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine) both were compared for their post-operative effects with Bromage score, Aldrete score & Visual Analogue Score. : The time required for complete regression of motor blockade in group R (144.5+26.1 mins) < group B (181±21.3mins) which allowed for early mobilization which over all provides better and faster recovery.: Hyperbaric Ropivacaine when compared to Bupivacaine promises better results in terms of early ambulation and intraoperative hemodynamic stability promoting ERAS in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction surgeries. Promoting ERAS policy will reduce the duration of hospital stay, thereby improving the cost-effectiveness of health services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信