未登记婚姻协议的法律后果(最高法院第 598/PK/PDT/2016 号判决中的婚姻案例研究)

Widya Anggayesti Handayani, Gunawan Djajaputra
{"title":"未登记婚姻协议的法律后果(最高法院第 598/PK/PDT/2016 号判决中的婚姻案例研究)","authors":"Widya Anggayesti Handayani, Gunawan Djajaputra","doi":"10.38035/jlph.v4i4.509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Indonesia, a marriage agreement is regulated in Article 119 of the Civil Code and Article 29 of Law Number 1 Year 1974 concerning marriage. The marriage agreement is made by a notary as an authorized party and legalized by the marriage registrar. However, there are often problems related to marriage agreements, especially when they are not recorded by the marriage registrar. Meanwhile, the recording of a marriage agreement has an important urgency for each party, which provides justice, certainty, and legal benefits. The non-recording of a marriage agreement by a marriage registration officer will have legal consequences, one of which is the potential for legal problems that lead to disputes over joint property after divorce. This research analyzes how the importance of recording a marriage agreement and its legal consequences through Supreme Court Decision Number 598 PK/Pdt/2016 with a normative juridical approach. The results show that the marriage agreement can still be canceled because it does not meet the formal requirements of the provisions of Article 29 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law, namely the element of being legalized by a marriage registration officer. The legal effect is that the assets obtained during the marriage must be separated and divided equally.","PeriodicalId":397335,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Consequences of an Unregistered Marriage Agreement From a Marriage Agreement Deed Canceled by The Supreme Court (Case Study of Marriage in The Decision of The Supreme Court Number 598/PK/PDT/2016)\",\"authors\":\"Widya Anggayesti Handayani, Gunawan Djajaputra\",\"doi\":\"10.38035/jlph.v4i4.509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Indonesia, a marriage agreement is regulated in Article 119 of the Civil Code and Article 29 of Law Number 1 Year 1974 concerning marriage. The marriage agreement is made by a notary as an authorized party and legalized by the marriage registrar. However, there are often problems related to marriage agreements, especially when they are not recorded by the marriage registrar. Meanwhile, the recording of a marriage agreement has an important urgency for each party, which provides justice, certainty, and legal benefits. The non-recording of a marriage agreement by a marriage registration officer will have legal consequences, one of which is the potential for legal problems that lead to disputes over joint property after divorce. This research analyzes how the importance of recording a marriage agreement and its legal consequences through Supreme Court Decision Number 598 PK/Pdt/2016 with a normative juridical approach. The results show that the marriage agreement can still be canceled because it does not meet the formal requirements of the provisions of Article 29 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law, namely the element of being legalized by a marriage registration officer. The legal effect is that the assets obtained during the marriage must be separated and divided equally.\",\"PeriodicalId\":397335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i4.509\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i4.509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在印度尼西亚,《民法典》第 119 条和关于婚姻的 1974 年第 1 号法律第 29 条对婚姻协议做出了规定。婚姻协议由公证人作为受权方签署,并由婚姻登记处进行公证。然而,与婚姻协议有关的问题时有发生,尤其是在婚姻登记处没有记录婚姻协议的情况下。同时,婚姻协议的记录对于每一方来说都具有重要的紧迫性,它可以提供公正性、确定性和法律利益。婚姻登记员不对婚姻协议进行记录将产生法律后果,其中之一就是可能出现法律问题,导致离婚后对共同财产产生纠纷。本研究通过最高法院第 598 PK/Pdt/2016 号判决,以规范法学方法分析了记录婚姻协议的重要性及其法律后果。结果表明,婚姻协议仍然可以被取消,因为它不符合《婚姻法》第 29 条第 1 款规定的形式要求,即由婚姻登记官进行公证这一要素。其法律效力是,婚姻存续期间获得的财产必须分开平分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legal Consequences of an Unregistered Marriage Agreement From a Marriage Agreement Deed Canceled by The Supreme Court (Case Study of Marriage in The Decision of The Supreme Court Number 598/PK/PDT/2016)
In Indonesia, a marriage agreement is regulated in Article 119 of the Civil Code and Article 29 of Law Number 1 Year 1974 concerning marriage. The marriage agreement is made by a notary as an authorized party and legalized by the marriage registrar. However, there are often problems related to marriage agreements, especially when they are not recorded by the marriage registrar. Meanwhile, the recording of a marriage agreement has an important urgency for each party, which provides justice, certainty, and legal benefits. The non-recording of a marriage agreement by a marriage registration officer will have legal consequences, one of which is the potential for legal problems that lead to disputes over joint property after divorce. This research analyzes how the importance of recording a marriage agreement and its legal consequences through Supreme Court Decision Number 598 PK/Pdt/2016 with a normative juridical approach. The results show that the marriage agreement can still be canceled because it does not meet the formal requirements of the provisions of Article 29 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law, namely the element of being legalized by a marriage registration officer. The legal effect is that the assets obtained during the marriage must be separated and divided equally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信