Victor Epie Ngome 和 Rosemary E. Ekosso 选编的两部喀麦隆文学作品中的表述、身份和反抗

Florence Mbi Nchia
{"title":"Victor Epie Ngome 和 Rosemary E. Ekosso 选编的两部喀麦隆文学作品中的表述、身份和反抗","authors":"Florence Mbi Nchia","doi":"10.46809/jcsll.v5i4.277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Representation and identity are complex concepts with diverse connotations that involve the binaries ‘the self’’ and ‘the other’. These oppositions could either be referring to an individual, a group, or a particular sex. However, some concepts like Hanna Fenichel Pitkin’s ‘Concept of Representation’, Edward Saïd’s discourse on Orientalism, and Michel Foucault’s Concepts of Power and Resistance present a contradiction in the notion of representation, identity, and resistance. What then is a true representation, a real identity? Is resistance always predetermined or an entity in its own right? This  article seeks to examine the relationship in these concepts in two Anglophone Cameroonian literary texts notably, Victor Epie Ngome’s What God Has Put Asunder and Rosemary Ekosso’s House of Falling Women and to assess the validity of the textual representation of a union between two parties and the representation of the African woman in Ngome’s and Ekosso’s texts respectively. The methodology employed is comparative, analytical, and descriptive. The study tentatively concludes that, in as much as paradox abounds in the treatment of representation and true identity, it is observed that the self is in the best position to present itself, that representation, identity, and resistance are intrinsically intertwined, and that Ngome and Ekosso are actively engaged in a textual representation of the grievances of the Minority Anglophones and the unfavourable treatment of the woman in a patriarchal setting respectively. Otherness is found as the root cause of power dynamics.","PeriodicalId":508248,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Critical Studies in Language and Literature","volume":"2 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Representation, Identity, and Resistance in Two Selected Cameroonian Literary Texts by Victor Epie Ngome and Rosemary E. Ekosso\",\"authors\":\"Florence Mbi Nchia\",\"doi\":\"10.46809/jcsll.v5i4.277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Representation and identity are complex concepts with diverse connotations that involve the binaries ‘the self’’ and ‘the other’. These oppositions could either be referring to an individual, a group, or a particular sex. However, some concepts like Hanna Fenichel Pitkin’s ‘Concept of Representation’, Edward Saïd’s discourse on Orientalism, and Michel Foucault’s Concepts of Power and Resistance present a contradiction in the notion of representation, identity, and resistance. What then is a true representation, a real identity? Is resistance always predetermined or an entity in its own right? This  article seeks to examine the relationship in these concepts in two Anglophone Cameroonian literary texts notably, Victor Epie Ngome’s What God Has Put Asunder and Rosemary Ekosso’s House of Falling Women and to assess the validity of the textual representation of a union between two parties and the representation of the African woman in Ngome’s and Ekosso’s texts respectively. The methodology employed is comparative, analytical, and descriptive. The study tentatively concludes that, in as much as paradox abounds in the treatment of representation and true identity, it is observed that the self is in the best position to present itself, that representation, identity, and resistance are intrinsically intertwined, and that Ngome and Ekosso are actively engaged in a textual representation of the grievances of the Minority Anglophones and the unfavourable treatment of the woman in a patriarchal setting respectively. Otherness is found as the root cause of power dynamics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Critical Studies in Language and Literature\",\"volume\":\"2 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Critical Studies in Language and Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46809/jcsll.v5i4.277\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Critical Studies in Language and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46809/jcsll.v5i4.277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

表象和身份是一个复杂的概念,其内涵多种多样,涉及 "自我 "和 "他者 "的二元对立。这些二元对立既可以指个人,也可以指群体或特定性别。然而,一些概念,如汉娜-菲尼切尔-皮特金(Hanna Fenichel Pitkin)的 "表征概念"、爱德华-萨伊德(Edward Saïd)关于东方学的论述以及米歇尔-福柯(Michel Foucault)的 "权力与抵抗概念",在表征、身份和抵抗的概念中提出了矛盾。那么,什么是真正的表征,什么是真正的身份?抵抗是否总是预先确定的,还是本身就是一个实体?本文试图研究这两个概念在两个讲英语的喀麦隆文学文本中的关系,特别是维克多-埃皮-恩戈梅(Victor Epie Ngome)的《上帝拆散了什么》和罗斯玛丽-埃科索(Rosemary Ekosso)的《坠落的女人之家》,并分别评估恩戈梅和埃科索文本中双方结合的文本表述和非洲妇女表述的有效性。研究采用了比较、分析和描述性方法。研究初步得出结论认为,尽管在表述和真实身份的处理上存在大量悖论,但我们注意到,自我处于展示自身的最佳位置,表述、身份和反抗在本质上是相互交织的,恩戈梅和埃科索分别积极地在文本中表述了少数英国人的不满和妇女在父权制环境中受到的不利待遇。他者是权力动态的根源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Representation, Identity, and Resistance in Two Selected Cameroonian Literary Texts by Victor Epie Ngome and Rosemary E. Ekosso
Representation and identity are complex concepts with diverse connotations that involve the binaries ‘the self’’ and ‘the other’. These oppositions could either be referring to an individual, a group, or a particular sex. However, some concepts like Hanna Fenichel Pitkin’s ‘Concept of Representation’, Edward Saïd’s discourse on Orientalism, and Michel Foucault’s Concepts of Power and Resistance present a contradiction in the notion of representation, identity, and resistance. What then is a true representation, a real identity? Is resistance always predetermined or an entity in its own right? This  article seeks to examine the relationship in these concepts in two Anglophone Cameroonian literary texts notably, Victor Epie Ngome’s What God Has Put Asunder and Rosemary Ekosso’s House of Falling Women and to assess the validity of the textual representation of a union between two parties and the representation of the African woman in Ngome’s and Ekosso’s texts respectively. The methodology employed is comparative, analytical, and descriptive. The study tentatively concludes that, in as much as paradox abounds in the treatment of representation and true identity, it is observed that the self is in the best position to present itself, that representation, identity, and resistance are intrinsically intertwined, and that Ngome and Ekosso are actively engaged in a textual representation of the grievances of the Minority Anglophones and the unfavourable treatment of the woman in a patriarchal setting respectively. Otherness is found as the root cause of power dynamics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信