中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞计数比值、降钙素原和白细胞介素-6 对细菌性败血症严重程度评估的作用

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Shu-Qian Cai, Tingting Xia, Xiaoping Xu
{"title":"中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞计数比值、降钙素原和白细胞介素-6 对细菌性败血症严重程度评估的作用","authors":"Shu-Qian Cai, Tingting Xia, Xiaoping Xu","doi":"10.1515/labmed-2024-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives To explore the usefulness of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count ratio (NLR), procalcitonin (PCT), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) for the severity assessment of bacterial sepsis. Methods This study enrolled 100 patients with bacterial sepsis (disease group) who presented to Jinhua Central Hospital between March 2022 and March 2023 and 90 healthy individuals (control group). The patients were categorized into sepsis (64 cases), severe sepsis (18 cases), and septic shock (18 cases) groups according to the disease severity. The groups were compared in terms of the NLR, PCT, and IL-6, as well as the usefulness of these parameters, both alone and in combination, for the severity assessment of bacterial sepsis. Results The NLR, PCT, and IL-6 levels were significantly different among the three groups, with increasing values corresponding with disease aggravation. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the combinations of NLR, PCT, and IL-6 levels were higher than those of single markers. The sensitivity and AUC value of the combination of PCT and IL-6 levels were the highest (0.87), with a similar AUC value of the combination of NLR, PCT, and IL-6 (0.865); however, the specificity was significantly improved with the latter (0.938 vs. 0.859). Conclusions NLR, PCT, and IL-6 levels are significantly increased in bacterial sepsis, and the combination of PCT, and IL-6 levels can improve the sensitivity of the evaluation ability for severe sepsis, and is more economical.","PeriodicalId":55986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usefulness of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count ratio, procalcitonin, and interleukin-6 for severity assessment of bacterial sepsis\",\"authors\":\"Shu-Qian Cai, Tingting Xia, Xiaoping Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/labmed-2024-0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives To explore the usefulness of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count ratio (NLR), procalcitonin (PCT), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) for the severity assessment of bacterial sepsis. Methods This study enrolled 100 patients with bacterial sepsis (disease group) who presented to Jinhua Central Hospital between March 2022 and March 2023 and 90 healthy individuals (control group). The patients were categorized into sepsis (64 cases), severe sepsis (18 cases), and septic shock (18 cases) groups according to the disease severity. The groups were compared in terms of the NLR, PCT, and IL-6, as well as the usefulness of these parameters, both alone and in combination, for the severity assessment of bacterial sepsis. Results The NLR, PCT, and IL-6 levels were significantly different among the three groups, with increasing values corresponding with disease aggravation. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the combinations of NLR, PCT, and IL-6 levels were higher than those of single markers. The sensitivity and AUC value of the combination of PCT and IL-6 levels were the highest (0.87), with a similar AUC value of the combination of NLR, PCT, and IL-6 (0.865); however, the specificity was significantly improved with the latter (0.938 vs. 0.859). Conclusions NLR, PCT, and IL-6 levels are significantly increased in bacterial sepsis, and the combination of PCT, and IL-6 levels can improve the sensitivity of the evaluation ability for severe sepsis, and is more economical.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2024-0007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2024-0007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 目的 探讨中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞计数比(NLR)、降钙素原(PCT)和白细胞介素-6(IL-6)对细菌性败血症严重程度评估的作用。方法 本研究选取了 2022 年 3 月至 2023 年 3 月期间在金华市中心医院就诊的 100 名细菌性败血症患者(疾病组)和 90 名健康人(对照组)。根据病情严重程度将患者分为败血症组(64 例)、重症败血症组(18 例)和脓毒性休克组(18 例)。比较了各组的 NLR、PCT 和 IL-6,以及这些参数单独或组合在细菌性败血症严重程度评估中的作用。结果 三组患者的 NLR、PCT 和 IL-6 水平有显著差异,数值越大,病情越严重。NLR、PCT和IL-6水平组合的曲线下面积(AUC)值高于单一指标。PCT 和 IL-6 水平组合的灵敏度和 AUC 值最高(0.87),NLR、PCT 和 IL-6 组合的 AUC 值相似(0.865);但后者的特异性明显提高(0.938 对 0.859)。结论 细菌性脓毒症患者的 NLR、PCT 和 IL-6 水平均显著升高,PCT 和 IL-6 水平的组合可提高严重脓毒症评估能力的灵敏度,而且更经济。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Usefulness of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count ratio, procalcitonin, and interleukin-6 for severity assessment of bacterial sepsis
Abstract Objectives To explore the usefulness of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count ratio (NLR), procalcitonin (PCT), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) for the severity assessment of bacterial sepsis. Methods This study enrolled 100 patients with bacterial sepsis (disease group) who presented to Jinhua Central Hospital between March 2022 and March 2023 and 90 healthy individuals (control group). The patients were categorized into sepsis (64 cases), severe sepsis (18 cases), and septic shock (18 cases) groups according to the disease severity. The groups were compared in terms of the NLR, PCT, and IL-6, as well as the usefulness of these parameters, both alone and in combination, for the severity assessment of bacterial sepsis. Results The NLR, PCT, and IL-6 levels were significantly different among the three groups, with increasing values corresponding with disease aggravation. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the combinations of NLR, PCT, and IL-6 levels were higher than those of single markers. The sensitivity and AUC value of the combination of PCT and IL-6 levels were the highest (0.87), with a similar AUC value of the combination of NLR, PCT, and IL-6 (0.865); however, the specificity was significantly improved with the latter (0.938 vs. 0.859). Conclusions NLR, PCT, and IL-6 levels are significantly increased in bacterial sepsis, and the combination of PCT, and IL-6 levels can improve the sensitivity of the evaluation ability for severe sepsis, and is more economical.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Laboratory Medicine Mathematics-Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Laboratory Medicine (JLM) is a bi-monthly published journal that reports on the latest developments in laboratory medicine. Particular focus is placed on the diagnostic aspects of the clinical laboratory, although technical, regulatory, and educational topics are equally covered. The Journal specializes in the publication of high-standard, competent and timely review articles on clinical, methodological and pathogenic aspects of modern laboratory diagnostics. These reviews are critically reviewed by expert reviewers and JLM’s Associate Editors who are specialists in the various subdisciplines of laboratory medicine. In addition, JLM publishes original research articles, case reports, point/counterpoint articles and letters to the editor, all of which are peer reviewed by at least two experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信