分子护理点检测开发:设计和注意事项。

Ashley Hassman, Colby Rouchka, Diego Sunino, Felix Veloz Espinal, Mona Youssef, Renee Richie Casey
{"title":"分子护理点检测开发:设计和注意事项。","authors":"Ashley Hassman,&nbsp;Colby Rouchka,&nbsp;Diego Sunino,&nbsp;Felix Veloz Espinal,&nbsp;Mona Youssef,&nbsp;Renee Richie Casey","doi":"10.1002/cpz1.1058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Molecular diagnostic point-of-care (MDx POC) testing is gaining momentum and is increasingly important for infectious disease detection and monitoring, as well as other diagnostic areas such as oncology. Molecular testing has traditionally required high-complexity laboratories. Laboratory testing complexity is determined by utilizing the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) Categorization Criteria scorecard, utilizing seven criteria that are scored on a scale of one to three. Previously, most commercially available point-of-care (POC) tests use other analytes and technologies that were not found to be highly complex by the CLIA scoring system. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, MDx POC testing became much more prominent. Utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated that MDx POC testing applications can have outstanding advantages compared to available non-molecular POC diagnostic tests. This article introduces MDx POC testing to students, technologists, researchers, and others, providing a general algorithm for MDx POC test development. This algorithm is an introductory, step-by-step decision tree for defining a molecular POC diagnostic device meeting the functional requirements for a desired application. The technical considerations driving the decision-making include nucleic acid selection method (DNA, RNA), extraction methods, sample preparation, number of targets, amplification technology, and detection method. The scope of this article includes neither higher-order multiplexing, nor quantitative molecular analysis. This article covers key application considerations, such as sensitivity, specificity, turnaround time, and shipping/storage requirements. This article provides an overall understanding of the best resources and practices to use when developing a MDx POC assay that may be a helpful resource for readers without extensive molecular testing experience as well as for those who are already familiar with molecular testing who want to increase MDx availability at the POC. © 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":93970,"journal":{"name":"Current protocols","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular Point-of-Care Assay Development: Design and Considerations\",\"authors\":\"Ashley Hassman,&nbsp;Colby Rouchka,&nbsp;Diego Sunino,&nbsp;Felix Veloz Espinal,&nbsp;Mona Youssef,&nbsp;Renee Richie Casey\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpz1.1058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Molecular diagnostic point-of-care (MDx POC) testing is gaining momentum and is increasingly important for infectious disease detection and monitoring, as well as other diagnostic areas such as oncology. Molecular testing has traditionally required high-complexity laboratories. Laboratory testing complexity is determined by utilizing the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) Categorization Criteria scorecard, utilizing seven criteria that are scored on a scale of one to three. Previously, most commercially available point-of-care (POC) tests use other analytes and technologies that were not found to be highly complex by the CLIA scoring system. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, MDx POC testing became much more prominent. Utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated that MDx POC testing applications can have outstanding advantages compared to available non-molecular POC diagnostic tests. This article introduces MDx POC testing to students, technologists, researchers, and others, providing a general algorithm for MDx POC test development. This algorithm is an introductory, step-by-step decision tree for defining a molecular POC diagnostic device meeting the functional requirements for a desired application. The technical considerations driving the decision-making include nucleic acid selection method (DNA, RNA), extraction methods, sample preparation, number of targets, amplification technology, and detection method. The scope of this article includes neither higher-order multiplexing, nor quantitative molecular analysis. This article covers key application considerations, such as sensitivity, specificity, turnaround time, and shipping/storage requirements. This article provides an overall understanding of the best resources and practices to use when developing a MDx POC assay that may be a helpful resource for readers without extensive molecular testing experience as well as for those who are already familiar with molecular testing who want to increase MDx availability at the POC. © 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current protocols\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current protocols\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpz1.1058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpz1.1058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分子诊断床旁检测(MDx POC)的发展势头日益强劲,在传染病检测和监测以及肿瘤学等其他诊断领域也越来越重要。分子检测传统上需要高复杂度的实验室。实验室检测的复杂程度是根据 1988 年临床实验室改进修正案(CLIA)分类标准记分卡确定的,该记分卡采用七项标准,按 1 到 3 的等级评分。在此之前,大多数商业化的护理点(POC)检验使用的其他分析物和技术在 CLIA 评分系统中并不被认为是高度复杂的。然而,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,MDx POC 检测变得更加突出。在 COVID-19 大流行期间的使用情况表明,与现有的非分子 POC 诊断检验相比,MDx POC 检验应用具有突出的优势。本文向学生、技术人员、研究人员和其他人介绍了 MDx POC 检测,提供了 MDx POC 检测开发的一般算法。该算法是一个入门级的逐步决策树,用于定义符合所需应用功能要求的分子 POC 诊断设备。推动决策的技术考虑因素包括核酸选择方法(DNA、RNA)、提取方法、样品制备、靶标数量、扩增技术和检测方法。本文的讨论范围既不包括高阶复用,也不包括定量分子分析。本文涵盖了主要的应用考虑因素,如灵敏度、特异性、周转时间和运输/储存要求。本文提供了在开发 MDx POC 检测时应使用的最佳资源和实践的总体理解,对于没有丰富分子检测经验的读者以及已经熟悉分子检测但希望在 POC 增加 MDx 可用性的读者来说,这可能是一个有用的资源。© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Molecular Point-of-Care Assay Development: Design and Considerations

Molecular diagnostic point-of-care (MDx POC) testing is gaining momentum and is increasingly important for infectious disease detection and monitoring, as well as other diagnostic areas such as oncology. Molecular testing has traditionally required high-complexity laboratories. Laboratory testing complexity is determined by utilizing the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) Categorization Criteria scorecard, utilizing seven criteria that are scored on a scale of one to three. Previously, most commercially available point-of-care (POC) tests use other analytes and technologies that were not found to be highly complex by the CLIA scoring system. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, MDx POC testing became much more prominent. Utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated that MDx POC testing applications can have outstanding advantages compared to available non-molecular POC diagnostic tests. This article introduces MDx POC testing to students, technologists, researchers, and others, providing a general algorithm for MDx POC test development. This algorithm is an introductory, step-by-step decision tree for defining a molecular POC diagnostic device meeting the functional requirements for a desired application. The technical considerations driving the decision-making include nucleic acid selection method (DNA, RNA), extraction methods, sample preparation, number of targets, amplification technology, and detection method. The scope of this article includes neither higher-order multiplexing, nor quantitative molecular analysis. This article covers key application considerations, such as sensitivity, specificity, turnaround time, and shipping/storage requirements. This article provides an overall understanding of the best resources and practices to use when developing a MDx POC assay that may be a helpful resource for readers without extensive molecular testing experience as well as for those who are already familiar with molecular testing who want to increase MDx availability at the POC. © 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信