在18010名中国妇女中比较首次怀孕妇女和有多次妊娠史妇女的不规则红细胞抗体的检出率和特异性。

IF 3.2 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal of Pregnancy Pub Date : 2024-05-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/5539776
Shujie Wu, Yinglin Wu, Ganping Guo, Rungui Xie, Yuanjun Wu
{"title":"在18010名中国妇女中比较首次怀孕妇女和有多次妊娠史妇女的不规则红细胞抗体的检出率和特异性。","authors":"Shujie Wu, Yinglin Wu, Ganping Guo, Rungui Xie, Yuanjun Wu","doi":"10.1155/2024/5539776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> There is insufficient evidence to assess the risk of the production of clinically important alloimmune irregular red blood cell (RBC) antibodies in first-time pregnant women. <b>Methods:</b> Using the microcolumn gel antiglobulin method, 18,010 Chinese women with a history of pregnancy and pregnant women were screened for irregular RBC antibodies, and for those with positive test results, antibody specificity was determined. The detection rate and specificity of irregular RBC antibodies in women with a history of multiple pregnancies (two or more) and first-time pregnant women were determined. <b>Results:</b> In addition to 25 patients who passively acquired anti-D antibodies via an intravenous anti-D immunoglobulin injection, irregular RBC antibodies were detected in 121 (0.67%) of the 18,010 women. Irregular RBC antibodies were detected in 93 (0.71%) of the 13,027 women with a history of multiple pregnancies, and antibody specificity was distributed mainly in the Rh, MNSs, Lewis, and Kidd blood group systems; irregular RBC antibodies were detected in 28 (0.56%) of the 4983 first-time pregnant women, and the antibody specificity was distributed mainly in the MNSs, Rh, and Lewis blood group systems. The difference in the percentage of patients with irregular RBC antibodies between the two groups was insignificant (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> = 1.248, <i>P</i> > 0.05). Of the 121 women with irregular RBC antibodies, nine had anti-Mur antibodies, and one had anti-Di<sup>a</sup> antibodies; these antibodies are clinically important but easily missed because the antigenic profile of the reagent RBCs that are commonly used in antibody screens does not include the antigens that are recognized by these antibodies. <b>Conclusion:</b> Irregular RBC antibody detection is clinically important for both pregnant women with a history of multiple pregnancies and first-time pregnant women. Mur and Di<sup>a</sup> should be included in the antigenic profile of reagent RBCs that are used for performing antibody screens in the Chinese population.</p>","PeriodicalId":47062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pregnancy","volume":"2024 ","pages":"5539776"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11178407/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Detection Rate and Specificity of Irregular Red Blood Cell Antibodies Between First-Time Pregnant Women and Women With a History of Multiple Pregnancies Among 18,010 Chinese Women.\",\"authors\":\"Shujie Wu, Yinglin Wu, Ganping Guo, Rungui Xie, Yuanjun Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/5539776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> There is insufficient evidence to assess the risk of the production of clinically important alloimmune irregular red blood cell (RBC) antibodies in first-time pregnant women. <b>Methods:</b> Using the microcolumn gel antiglobulin method, 18,010 Chinese women with a history of pregnancy and pregnant women were screened for irregular RBC antibodies, and for those with positive test results, antibody specificity was determined. The detection rate and specificity of irregular RBC antibodies in women with a history of multiple pregnancies (two or more) and first-time pregnant women were determined. <b>Results:</b> In addition to 25 patients who passively acquired anti-D antibodies via an intravenous anti-D immunoglobulin injection, irregular RBC antibodies were detected in 121 (0.67%) of the 18,010 women. Irregular RBC antibodies were detected in 93 (0.71%) of the 13,027 women with a history of multiple pregnancies, and antibody specificity was distributed mainly in the Rh, MNSs, Lewis, and Kidd blood group systems; irregular RBC antibodies were detected in 28 (0.56%) of the 4983 first-time pregnant women, and the antibody specificity was distributed mainly in the MNSs, Rh, and Lewis blood group systems. The difference in the percentage of patients with irregular RBC antibodies between the two groups was insignificant (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> = 1.248, <i>P</i> > 0.05). Of the 121 women with irregular RBC antibodies, nine had anti-Mur antibodies, and one had anti-Di<sup>a</sup> antibodies; these antibodies are clinically important but easily missed because the antigenic profile of the reagent RBCs that are commonly used in antibody screens does not include the antigens that are recognized by these antibodies. <b>Conclusion:</b> Irregular RBC antibody detection is clinically important for both pregnant women with a history of multiple pregnancies and first-time pregnant women. Mur and Di<sup>a</sup> should be included in the antigenic profile of reagent RBCs that are used for performing antibody screens in the Chinese population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pregnancy\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"5539776\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11178407/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pregnancy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5539776\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pregnancy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5539776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前还没有足够的证据来评估首次怀孕妇女产生临床上重要的同种免疫不规则红细胞(RBC)抗体的风险。方法:使用微柱凝胶抗球蛋白法:采用微柱凝胶抗球蛋白法对 18010 名有妊娠史的中国女性和孕妇进行不规则红细胞抗体筛查,并对检测结果呈阳性的孕妇进行抗体特异性测定。还测定了多胎妊娠史(两次或两次以上)妇女和首次怀孕妇女的不规则红细胞抗体的检出率和特异性。结果除了 25 名通过静脉注射抗 D 免疫球蛋白被动获得抗 D 抗体的患者外,18010 名妇女中有 121 人(0.67%)检测到了不规则 RBC 抗体。在 13 027 名有多胎妊娠史的妇女中,93 人(0.71%)检测到不规则 RBC 抗体,抗体特异性主要分布在 Rh、MNSs、Lewis 和 Kidd 血型系统中;在 4 983 名首次怀孕的妇女中,28 人(0.56%)检测到不规则 RBC 抗体,抗体特异性主要分布在 MNSs、Rh 和 Lewis 血型系统中。两组不规则红细胞抗体患者的百分比差异不显著(χ 2 = 1.248,P > 0.05)。在 121 名出现不规则红细胞抗体的女性患者中,9 人有抗 Mur 抗体,1 人有抗 Dia 抗体;这些抗体在临床上很重要,但很容易被漏诊,因为抗体筛查中常用的试剂红细胞的抗原谱不包括这些抗体所识别的抗原。结论不规则红细胞抗体检测对有多胎妊娠史的孕妇和首次怀孕的孕妇都有重要的临床意义。在中国人群中,用于抗体筛查的试剂红细胞的抗原谱中应包括 Mur 和 Dia。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Detection Rate and Specificity of Irregular Red Blood Cell Antibodies Between First-Time Pregnant Women and Women With a History of Multiple Pregnancies Among 18,010 Chinese Women.

Background: There is insufficient evidence to assess the risk of the production of clinically important alloimmune irregular red blood cell (RBC) antibodies in first-time pregnant women. Methods: Using the microcolumn gel antiglobulin method, 18,010 Chinese women with a history of pregnancy and pregnant women were screened for irregular RBC antibodies, and for those with positive test results, antibody specificity was determined. The detection rate and specificity of irregular RBC antibodies in women with a history of multiple pregnancies (two or more) and first-time pregnant women were determined. Results: In addition to 25 patients who passively acquired anti-D antibodies via an intravenous anti-D immunoglobulin injection, irregular RBC antibodies were detected in 121 (0.67%) of the 18,010 women. Irregular RBC antibodies were detected in 93 (0.71%) of the 13,027 women with a history of multiple pregnancies, and antibody specificity was distributed mainly in the Rh, MNSs, Lewis, and Kidd blood group systems; irregular RBC antibodies were detected in 28 (0.56%) of the 4983 first-time pregnant women, and the antibody specificity was distributed mainly in the MNSs, Rh, and Lewis blood group systems. The difference in the percentage of patients with irregular RBC antibodies between the two groups was insignificant (χ 2 = 1.248, P > 0.05). Of the 121 women with irregular RBC antibodies, nine had anti-Mur antibodies, and one had anti-Dia antibodies; these antibodies are clinically important but easily missed because the antigenic profile of the reagent RBCs that are commonly used in antibody screens does not include the antigens that are recognized by these antibodies. Conclusion: Irregular RBC antibody detection is clinically important for both pregnant women with a history of multiple pregnancies and first-time pregnant women. Mur and Dia should be included in the antigenic profile of reagent RBCs that are used for performing antibody screens in the Chinese population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pregnancy
Journal of Pregnancy OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pregnancy is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on breastfeeding, labor, maternal health and the biomedical aspects of pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信