种植体与基台连接对基台螺丝松动的影响:体外研究

Q4 Dentistry
Feridoun Parnia, Amin Nourizadeh, Elnaz Shafiee
{"title":"种植体与基台连接对基台螺丝松动的影响:体外研究","authors":"Feridoun Parnia, Amin Nourizadeh, Elnaz Shafiee","doi":"10.34172/joddd.29883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The widespread use of dental implants as a predictable treatment choice has drawn attention to their complications as a major challenge despite their high clinical success rates. In this context, loosening of the abutment screw in posterior single crowns is the most common problem; the use of adequate preload and proper anti-rotational features at implant‒abutment interface appear to be two main solutions to such a problem. The present study evaluated the effect of implant‒abutment connections in four different implant systems before and after cyclic loading.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Intra-Lock, Dentis, Xive, and Dio implant systems were used in this study. Each system underwent one million cycles of dynamic forces eight times with a magnitude of 110 N. For each specimen after tightening the screw with a torque of 32 Ncm, the detorque values were measured and recorded by a digital torquemeter after and before cyclic loading. Data were analyzed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Levene's, one-way ANOVA, and post hoc Tukey tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initial detorque values between the study groups showed significant differences (<i>P</i><0.0001). Pairwise comparisons showed significantly lower primary detorque values in the Dentis system compared to the three other systems (<i>P</i><0.0001). After cyclic loading, significant differences were observed between the study groups (<i>P</i><0.0001). Pairwise comparisons of the groups showed significant differences between all the systems after loading.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The type of implant‒abutment connection is an essential factor influencing the amount of abutment screw loosening.</p>","PeriodicalId":15599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects","volume":"18 1","pages":"17-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11179142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of implant‒abutment connections on abutment screw loosening: An in vitro study.\",\"authors\":\"Feridoun Parnia, Amin Nourizadeh, Elnaz Shafiee\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/joddd.29883\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The widespread use of dental implants as a predictable treatment choice has drawn attention to their complications as a major challenge despite their high clinical success rates. In this context, loosening of the abutment screw in posterior single crowns is the most common problem; the use of adequate preload and proper anti-rotational features at implant‒abutment interface appear to be two main solutions to such a problem. The present study evaluated the effect of implant‒abutment connections in four different implant systems before and after cyclic loading.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Intra-Lock, Dentis, Xive, and Dio implant systems were used in this study. Each system underwent one million cycles of dynamic forces eight times with a magnitude of 110 N. For each specimen after tightening the screw with a torque of 32 Ncm, the detorque values were measured and recorded by a digital torquemeter after and before cyclic loading. Data were analyzed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Levene's, one-way ANOVA, and post hoc Tukey tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initial detorque values between the study groups showed significant differences (<i>P</i><0.0001). Pairwise comparisons showed significantly lower primary detorque values in the Dentis system compared to the three other systems (<i>P</i><0.0001). After cyclic loading, significant differences were observed between the study groups (<i>P</i><0.0001). Pairwise comparisons of the groups showed significant differences between all the systems after loading.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The type of implant‒abutment connection is an essential factor influencing the amount of abutment screw loosening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"17-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11179142/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.29883\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.29883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:作为一种可预测的治疗选择,牙科种植体的广泛使用引起了人们对其并发症的关注,尽管其临床成功率很高,但并发症仍是一大挑战。在这种情况下,后牙单冠中基台螺丝的松动是最常见的问题;在种植体-基台界面上使用足够的预紧力和适当的防旋转功能似乎是解决这一问题的两个主要方法。本研究评估了四种不同种植体系统在循环加载前后种植体与基台连接的效果:本研究使用了 Intra-Lock、Dentis、Xive 和 Dio 种植体系统。每个系统都承受了 8 次 100 万次、110 N 的动态力循环。每个试样在以 32 Ncm 扭矩拧紧螺钉后,都用数字扭矩计测量并记录了循环加载后和循环加载前的扭矩值。数据分析采用了 Kolmogorov-Smirnov、Levene's、单因素方差分析和事后 Tukey 检验:结果:各研究组之间的初始扭矩值存在显著差异(PPP结论:种植体与基台的类型与周期加载的影响密切相关:结论:种植体与基台连接的类型是影响基台螺丝松动量的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of implant‒abutment connections on abutment screw loosening: An in vitro study.

Background: The widespread use of dental implants as a predictable treatment choice has drawn attention to their complications as a major challenge despite their high clinical success rates. In this context, loosening of the abutment screw in posterior single crowns is the most common problem; the use of adequate preload and proper anti-rotational features at implant‒abutment interface appear to be two main solutions to such a problem. The present study evaluated the effect of implant‒abutment connections in four different implant systems before and after cyclic loading.

Methods: Intra-Lock, Dentis, Xive, and Dio implant systems were used in this study. Each system underwent one million cycles of dynamic forces eight times with a magnitude of 110 N. For each specimen after tightening the screw with a torque of 32 Ncm, the detorque values were measured and recorded by a digital torquemeter after and before cyclic loading. Data were analyzed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Levene's, one-way ANOVA, and post hoc Tukey tests.

Results: Initial detorque values between the study groups showed significant differences (P<0.0001). Pairwise comparisons showed significantly lower primary detorque values in the Dentis system compared to the three other systems (P<0.0001). After cyclic loading, significant differences were observed between the study groups (P<0.0001). Pairwise comparisons of the groups showed significant differences between all the systems after loading.

Conclusion: The type of implant‒abutment connection is an essential factor influencing the amount of abutment screw loosening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Dental Research Dental Clinics Dental Prospects (JODDD) is a Platinum* Open Access, peer-reviewed quarterly indexed journal that publishes articles of basic, clinical, and prospective nature in all areas of dentistry and oral health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信