氯胺酮和艾司氯胺酮与自杀之间的关联:向食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)提交的报告。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2368827
Roger S McIntyre, Rodrigo B Mansur, Joshua D Rosenblat, Kayla M Teopiz, Angela T H Kwan
{"title":"氯胺酮和艾司氯胺酮与自杀之间的关联:向食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)提交的报告。","authors":"Roger S McIntyre, Rodrigo B Mansur, Joshua D Rosenblat, Kayla M Teopiz, Angela T H Kwan","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2368827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Replicated evidence indicates that ketamine and esketamine reduce measures of suicidality in persons with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). It remains uncertain whether individuals experience worsening of preexisting suicidality with either agent.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database was searched from 1970 and 2019 to 30 September 2023 for reports of suicidal ideation, depression suicidal, suicidal behavior, suicidal attempt, and completed suicide in association with ketamine and esketamine exposure, respectively. We present reporting odds ratios (ROR) significance was determined when the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) exceeded 1.0. Lithium was used as the control agent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Observed a higher ROR for suicidal ideation (ROR 7.58, 95% CI 6.34-9.07) and depression suicidal (ROR 14.19, 95% CI 1.80-112.07) with esketamine. Significantly lower RORs were observed for suicide attempt with ketamine (ROR 0.15, 95% CI 0.11-0.21) and esketamine (ROR 0.57, 95% CI 0.48-0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mixed RORs across aspects of suicidality were observed with ketamine and esketamine. Limitations of the FAERS database prevent any determination of causal effects new onset suicidality to either agent. The lower RORs for suicide attempt with ketamine and esketamine is noted but cannot be interpreted as a direct therapeutic effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"909-914"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association between ketamine and esketamine and suicidality: reports to the Food And Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).\",\"authors\":\"Roger S McIntyre, Rodrigo B Mansur, Joshua D Rosenblat, Kayla M Teopiz, Angela T H Kwan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2024.2368827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Replicated evidence indicates that ketamine and esketamine reduce measures of suicidality in persons with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). It remains uncertain whether individuals experience worsening of preexisting suicidality with either agent.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database was searched from 1970 and 2019 to 30 September 2023 for reports of suicidal ideation, depression suicidal, suicidal behavior, suicidal attempt, and completed suicide in association with ketamine and esketamine exposure, respectively. We present reporting odds ratios (ROR) significance was determined when the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) exceeded 1.0. Lithium was used as the control agent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Observed a higher ROR for suicidal ideation (ROR 7.58, 95% CI 6.34-9.07) and depression suicidal (ROR 14.19, 95% CI 1.80-112.07) with esketamine. Significantly lower RORs were observed for suicide attempt with ketamine (ROR 0.15, 95% CI 0.11-0.21) and esketamine (ROR 0.57, 95% CI 0.48-0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mixed RORs across aspects of suicidality were observed with ketamine and esketamine. Limitations of the FAERS database prevent any determination of causal effects new onset suicidality to either agent. The lower RORs for suicide attempt with ketamine and esketamine is noted but cannot be interpreted as a direct therapeutic effect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"909-914\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2368827\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2368827","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:重复性证据表明,氯胺酮和艾司氯胺酮可减少治疗耐受性抑郁症(TRD)患者的自杀倾向。研究设计和方法:在食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中搜索了1970年和2019年至2023年9月30日期间分别与氯胺酮和埃氯胺酮暴露相关的自杀意念、抑郁自杀、自杀行为、自杀未遂和完成自杀的报告。我们使用报告几率比(ROR)来显示数据,当95%置信区间(CI)的下限超过1.0时,即判定为显著性。锂被用作对照药剂:在此,我们观察到埃斯氯胺的自杀意念(ROR 7.58,95% CI 6.34-9.07)和抑郁自杀(ROR 14.19,95% CI 1.80-112.07)的ROR较高。使用氯胺酮(ROR为0.15,95% CI为0.11-0.21)和艾司氯胺酮(ROR为0.57,95% CI为0.48-0.67)后,自杀未遂的ROR显著降低:结论:氯胺酮和艾司氯胺酮在自杀倾向各方面的ROR值不尽相同。由于FAERS数据库的局限性,无法确定新发自杀倾向与这两种药物之间的因果关系。我们注意到氯胺酮和艾司氯胺酮的自杀企图ROR较低,但鉴于数据库的局限性,不能将其解释为直接的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The association between ketamine and esketamine and suicidality: reports to the Food And Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Introduction: Replicated evidence indicates that ketamine and esketamine reduce measures of suicidality in persons with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). It remains uncertain whether individuals experience worsening of preexisting suicidality with either agent.

Research design and methods: The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database was searched from 1970 and 2019 to 30 September 2023 for reports of suicidal ideation, depression suicidal, suicidal behavior, suicidal attempt, and completed suicide in association with ketamine and esketamine exposure, respectively. We present reporting odds ratios (ROR) significance was determined when the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) exceeded 1.0. Lithium was used as the control agent.

Results: Observed a higher ROR for suicidal ideation (ROR 7.58, 95% CI 6.34-9.07) and depression suicidal (ROR 14.19, 95% CI 1.80-112.07) with esketamine. Significantly lower RORs were observed for suicide attempt with ketamine (ROR 0.15, 95% CI 0.11-0.21) and esketamine (ROR 0.57, 95% CI 0.48-0.67).

Conclusions: Mixed RORs across aspects of suicidality were observed with ketamine and esketamine. Limitations of the FAERS database prevent any determination of causal effects new onset suicidality to either agent. The lower RORs for suicide attempt with ketamine and esketamine is noted but cannot be interpreted as a direct therapeutic effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信