冰岛预防模式评估框架及实施完整性和一致性评估

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Michael J. Mann , John P. Allegrante , Megan L. Smith , Inga Dora Sigfusdottir , Alfgeir L. Kristjansson
{"title":"冰岛预防模式评估框架及实施完整性和一致性评估","authors":"Michael J. Mann ,&nbsp;John P. Allegrante ,&nbsp;Megan L. Smith ,&nbsp;Inga Dora Sigfusdottir ,&nbsp;Alfgeir L. Kristjansson","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Icelandic Prevention Model (IPM) follows a systematic but flexible process of community capacity building, data collection, analysis, dissemination, and community-engaged decision-making to guide the data-informed selection, prioritization, and implementation of intervention strategies in preventing adolescent substance use. This paper describes two new evaluation tools intended to assess the: 1) integrity of IPM implementation, and 2) unique aspects of IPM implementation in different community contexts. These evaluation tools include a: 1) five-phase <em>IPM Evaluation Framework for Assessing Value Across Communities, Cultures, and Outcomes (IPM-EF)</em>; and 2) 10-Step <em>IPM Implementation Integrity and Consistency Assessment</em> (<em>IPM-IICA</em>) that utilizes both quantitative (scored) and qualitative (narrative) data elements to characterize implementation integrity and consistency at both community coalition and school community levels. The IPM-EF includes five phases. Phase 1: Describe the Intervention Context; Phase 2a: Document the Extent to Which the 10 Steps of the IPM were Implemented (using the IPM-IICA scored); Phase 2b: Document the Unique Community-Specific Methods Used within the 10 Steps of the IPM to Tailor Local Intervention Delivery (using the IPM-IICA narrative); Phase 3: Measure Changes in Community Risk and Protective Factors; Phase 4: Measure the Outcomes Associated with the IPM; and Phase 5: Investigate Multiple Full Cycles Over Time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000533/pdfft?md5=f4d4fedfa094d47cc0a82ca125168367&pid=1-s2.0-S0149718924000533-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Icelandic Prevention Model Evaluation Framework and Implementation Integrity and Consistency Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Michael J. Mann ,&nbsp;John P. Allegrante ,&nbsp;Megan L. Smith ,&nbsp;Inga Dora Sigfusdottir ,&nbsp;Alfgeir L. Kristjansson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Icelandic Prevention Model (IPM) follows a systematic but flexible process of community capacity building, data collection, analysis, dissemination, and community-engaged decision-making to guide the data-informed selection, prioritization, and implementation of intervention strategies in preventing adolescent substance use. This paper describes two new evaluation tools intended to assess the: 1) integrity of IPM implementation, and 2) unique aspects of IPM implementation in different community contexts. These evaluation tools include a: 1) five-phase <em>IPM Evaluation Framework for Assessing Value Across Communities, Cultures, and Outcomes (IPM-EF)</em>; and 2) 10-Step <em>IPM Implementation Integrity and Consistency Assessment</em> (<em>IPM-IICA</em>) that utilizes both quantitative (scored) and qualitative (narrative) data elements to characterize implementation integrity and consistency at both community coalition and school community levels. The IPM-EF includes five phases. Phase 1: Describe the Intervention Context; Phase 2a: Document the Extent to Which the 10 Steps of the IPM were Implemented (using the IPM-IICA scored); Phase 2b: Document the Unique Community-Specific Methods Used within the 10 Steps of the IPM to Tailor Local Intervention Delivery (using the IPM-IICA narrative); Phase 3: Measure Changes in Community Risk and Protective Factors; Phase 4: Measure the Outcomes Associated with the IPM; and Phase 5: Investigate Multiple Full Cycles Over Time.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000533/pdfft?md5=f4d4fedfa094d47cc0a82ca125168367&pid=1-s2.0-S0149718924000533-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000533\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000533","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

冰岛预防模式(IPM)采用系统而灵活的社区能力建设、数据收集、分析、传播和社区参与决策过程,以指导根据数据选择、优先考虑和实施预防青少年药物使用的干预策略。本文介绍了两种新的评估工具,旨在对以下方面进行评估:1) 综合预防机制实施的完整性,以及 2) 在不同社区背景下实施综合预防机制的独特方面。这些评估工具包括1) 五阶段 IPM 评估框架,用于评估跨社区、跨文化和跨成果的价值 (IPM-EF);以及 2) 10 步 IPM 实施完整性和一致性评估 (IPM-IICA),利用定量(评分)和定性(叙述)数据元素来描述社区联盟和学校社区层面的实施完整性和一致性。IPM-EF 包括五个阶段。第 1 阶段:描述干预背景;第 2a 阶段:记录 IPM 10 个步骤的实施程度(使用 IPM-IICA 评分);第 2b 阶段:阶段 3:测量社区风险和保护因素的变化;阶段 4:测量与 IPM 相关的成果;以及阶段 5:长期调查多个完整周期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Icelandic Prevention Model Evaluation Framework and Implementation Integrity and Consistency Assessment

The Icelandic Prevention Model (IPM) follows a systematic but flexible process of community capacity building, data collection, analysis, dissemination, and community-engaged decision-making to guide the data-informed selection, prioritization, and implementation of intervention strategies in preventing adolescent substance use. This paper describes two new evaluation tools intended to assess the: 1) integrity of IPM implementation, and 2) unique aspects of IPM implementation in different community contexts. These evaluation tools include a: 1) five-phase IPM Evaluation Framework for Assessing Value Across Communities, Cultures, and Outcomes (IPM-EF); and 2) 10-Step IPM Implementation Integrity and Consistency Assessment (IPM-IICA) that utilizes both quantitative (scored) and qualitative (narrative) data elements to characterize implementation integrity and consistency at both community coalition and school community levels. The IPM-EF includes five phases. Phase 1: Describe the Intervention Context; Phase 2a: Document the Extent to Which the 10 Steps of the IPM were Implemented (using the IPM-IICA scored); Phase 2b: Document the Unique Community-Specific Methods Used within the 10 Steps of the IPM to Tailor Local Intervention Delivery (using the IPM-IICA narrative); Phase 3: Measure Changes in Community Risk and Protective Factors; Phase 4: Measure the Outcomes Associated with the IPM; and Phase 5: Investigate Multiple Full Cycles Over Time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信