下腔静脉缺失患者的血栓风险和特征:一项多中心、回顾性、观察性研究。

IF 15.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Lancet Haematology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00138-8
Carlos Bravo-Pérez, Ana Blanco, Nuria Revilla, Jorge Cobos, Alba Salgado-Parente, Susana Asenjo, Ramiro Méndez, Luis Marti-Bonmati, Santiago Bonanad, José C Albillos, Nerea Castro, Shally Marcellini, Paul López Sala, Maialen Lasa, José M Bastida, María S Infante, Miguel A Corral, Javier Pagan, Pilar Llamas, Juan J Rodríguez-Sevilla, Agustín Rodríguez-Alen, Teresa S Sevivas, Daniela Morello, Cristina García Villar, Sara Lojo, Ana Marco, Paolo Simioni, Vicente Vicente, María L Lozano, María E de la Morena-Barrio, José M García-Santos, Javier Corral
{"title":"下腔静脉缺失患者的血栓风险和特征:一项多中心、回顾性、观察性研究。","authors":"Carlos Bravo-Pérez, Ana Blanco, Nuria Revilla, Jorge Cobos, Alba Salgado-Parente, Susana Asenjo, Ramiro Méndez, Luis Marti-Bonmati, Santiago Bonanad, José C Albillos, Nerea Castro, Shally Marcellini, Paul López Sala, Maialen Lasa, José M Bastida, María S Infante, Miguel A Corral, Javier Pagan, Pilar Llamas, Juan J Rodríguez-Sevilla, Agustín Rodríguez-Alen, Teresa S Sevivas, Daniela Morello, Cristina García Villar, Sara Lojo, Ana Marco, Paolo Simioni, Vicente Vicente, María L Lozano, María E de la Morena-Barrio, José M García-Santos, Javier Corral","doi":"10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00138-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inferior vena cava agenesis (IVCA) is a rare anomaly predisposing affected people to lower-limb venous thrombosis with low frequency of pulmonary embolism. Antenatal thrombosis and inherited thrombophilia have been suggested as causes of IVCA. However, there is little evidence on the clinical course and management of this condition. We designed a patient registry to assess the thrombotic risk and features of IVCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this this multicentre, retrospective, observational study, we included patients with IVCA diagnosed by routine imaging from 20 hospitals in Spain (n=18), Portugal (n=1), and Italy (n=1). Patients were identified from a systematic search in radiology databases using data extraction software (cohort A) and alternative searches in medical records for confirmed IVCA (cohort B; option allowed when systematic approaches were unapplicable). Primary outcomes were clinical and imaging features, thrombotic risk, phenotype of IVCA-associated thrombosis, anticoagulant treatment, and the results of thrombophilia testing.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We included patients with IVCA diagnosed by routine imaging studies done between Jan 1, 2010, and Dec 31, 2022. In the systematic search, 4 341 333 imaging exams were screened from the radiology databases of eight centres. 122 eligible patients were enrolled in cohort A. A further 95 patients were identified by screening medical records at 12 centres, of whom 88 were eligible and included in cohort B, making a combined cohort of 210 patients. 96 (46%) of 210 patients were female and 200 (95%) were European or Hispanic. 60 (29%) of 210 patients had hepatic IVC interruption, whereas 150 (71%) had extrahepatic IVCA. In cohort A, 65 (53%) of 122 patients had venous thrombosis, with an estimated annual risk of 1·15% (95% CI 0·89-1·46). Extrahepatic IVCA was associated with a greater risk of venous thrombosis than hepatic IVCA (56 [67%] of 84 patients vs nine [24%] of 38 patients, odds ratio 5·31, 95% CI 2·27-12·43; p<0·0001). Analysis of 126 patients with venous thrombosis pooled from cohorts A and B showed early-onset (median age 34·6 years, IQR 23·3-54·3) and recurrent events (50 [40%] of 126 patients). Patients with extrahepatic IVCA had greater proportions of lower-limb venous thrombosis (95 [87%] of 109 vs nine [53%] of 17, p=0·0010) and recurrence (48 [44%] of 109 vs two [12%] of 17, p=0·015), but lower rates of pulmonary embolism (10 [10%] of 99 vs four [33%] of 12, p=0·044) than did patients with hepatic IVCA. 77 (63%) of 122 patients with thrombosis underwent indefinite anticoagulation. 32 (29%) of 111 patients (29 [34%] of 86 with thrombosis) had coexisting thrombophilias. The recurrence risk was lower for patients receiving indefinite anticoagulation (adjusted odds ratio 0·24, 95% CI 0·08-0·61; p=0·010), and greater for thrombophilias (3·19, 1·09-9·32; p=0·034).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This evaluation of a large patient cohort demonstrates the high thrombotic burden of IVCA. We have identified two distinct forms of IVCA, hepatic and extrahepatic, suggesting different underlying mechanisms. Beyond clinical characterisation, we draw attention to this orphan disease and highlight the need for its study and improved care.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Spanish Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, FEDER, Fundación Séneca.</p>","PeriodicalId":48726,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Haematology","volume":" ","pages":"e606-e616"},"PeriodicalIF":15.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thrombotic risk and features of patients with inferior vena cava agenesis: a multicentre, retrospective, observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Bravo-Pérez, Ana Blanco, Nuria Revilla, Jorge Cobos, Alba Salgado-Parente, Susana Asenjo, Ramiro Méndez, Luis Marti-Bonmati, Santiago Bonanad, José C Albillos, Nerea Castro, Shally Marcellini, Paul López Sala, Maialen Lasa, José M Bastida, María S Infante, Miguel A Corral, Javier Pagan, Pilar Llamas, Juan J Rodríguez-Sevilla, Agustín Rodríguez-Alen, Teresa S Sevivas, Daniela Morello, Cristina García Villar, Sara Lojo, Ana Marco, Paolo Simioni, Vicente Vicente, María L Lozano, María E de la Morena-Barrio, José M García-Santos, Javier Corral\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00138-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inferior vena cava agenesis (IVCA) is a rare anomaly predisposing affected people to lower-limb venous thrombosis with low frequency of pulmonary embolism. Antenatal thrombosis and inherited thrombophilia have been suggested as causes of IVCA. However, there is little evidence on the clinical course and management of this condition. We designed a patient registry to assess the thrombotic risk and features of IVCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this this multicentre, retrospective, observational study, we included patients with IVCA diagnosed by routine imaging from 20 hospitals in Spain (n=18), Portugal (n=1), and Italy (n=1). Patients were identified from a systematic search in radiology databases using data extraction software (cohort A) and alternative searches in medical records for confirmed IVCA (cohort B; option allowed when systematic approaches were unapplicable). Primary outcomes were clinical and imaging features, thrombotic risk, phenotype of IVCA-associated thrombosis, anticoagulant treatment, and the results of thrombophilia testing.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We included patients with IVCA diagnosed by routine imaging studies done between Jan 1, 2010, and Dec 31, 2022. In the systematic search, 4 341 333 imaging exams were screened from the radiology databases of eight centres. 122 eligible patients were enrolled in cohort A. A further 95 patients were identified by screening medical records at 12 centres, of whom 88 were eligible and included in cohort B, making a combined cohort of 210 patients. 96 (46%) of 210 patients were female and 200 (95%) were European or Hispanic. 60 (29%) of 210 patients had hepatic IVC interruption, whereas 150 (71%) had extrahepatic IVCA. In cohort A, 65 (53%) of 122 patients had venous thrombosis, with an estimated annual risk of 1·15% (95% CI 0·89-1·46). Extrahepatic IVCA was associated with a greater risk of venous thrombosis than hepatic IVCA (56 [67%] of 84 patients vs nine [24%] of 38 patients, odds ratio 5·31, 95% CI 2·27-12·43; p<0·0001). Analysis of 126 patients with venous thrombosis pooled from cohorts A and B showed early-onset (median age 34·6 years, IQR 23·3-54·3) and recurrent events (50 [40%] of 126 patients). Patients with extrahepatic IVCA had greater proportions of lower-limb venous thrombosis (95 [87%] of 109 vs nine [53%] of 17, p=0·0010) and recurrence (48 [44%] of 109 vs two [12%] of 17, p=0·015), but lower rates of pulmonary embolism (10 [10%] of 99 vs four [33%] of 12, p=0·044) than did patients with hepatic IVCA. 77 (63%) of 122 patients with thrombosis underwent indefinite anticoagulation. 32 (29%) of 111 patients (29 [34%] of 86 with thrombosis) had coexisting thrombophilias. The recurrence risk was lower for patients receiving indefinite anticoagulation (adjusted odds ratio 0·24, 95% CI 0·08-0·61; p=0·010), and greater for thrombophilias (3·19, 1·09-9·32; p=0·034).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This evaluation of a large patient cohort demonstrates the high thrombotic burden of IVCA. We have identified two distinct forms of IVCA, hepatic and extrahepatic, suggesting different underlying mechanisms. Beyond clinical characterisation, we draw attention to this orphan disease and highlight the need for its study and improved care.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Spanish Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, FEDER, Fundación Séneca.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Haematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e606-e616\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Haematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00138-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00138-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:下腔静脉发育不全(IVCA)是一种罕见的畸形,患者易患下肢静脉血栓,肺栓塞发生率较低。产前血栓形成和遗传性血栓性疾病被认为是导致 IVCA 的原因。然而,有关这种疾病的临床过程和治疗方法的证据却很少。我们设计了一个患者登记系统来评估 IVCA 的血栓风险和特征:在这项多中心、回顾性、观察性研究中,我们纳入了西班牙(18 人)、葡萄牙(1 人)和意大利(1 人)20 家医院通过常规成像诊断出的 IVCA 患者。患者是通过使用数据提取软件在放射学数据库中进行系统搜索(群组 A)和在病历中搜索确诊的 IVCA 患者(群组 B;无法使用系统方法时可选择)确定的。主要结果包括临床和影像学特征、血栓形成风险、IVCA相关血栓形成的表型、抗凝治疗以及血栓性疾病检测结果:我们纳入了 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间通过常规影像学检查确诊的 IVCA 患者。在系统检索中,我们从八个中心的放射学数据库中筛选出了 4 341 333 例影像检查结果。通过对 12 个中心的医疗记录进行筛查,又确定了 95 名患者,其中 88 名符合条件并被纳入 B 组群,因此 B 组群共有 210 名患者。210名患者中有96名(46%)为女性,200名(95%)为欧洲裔或西班牙裔。210名患者中有60人(29%)肝内IVC中断,150人(71%)肝外IVCA。在队列 A 中,122 名患者中有 65 人(53%)患有静脉血栓,估计年风险为 1-15%(95% CI 0-89-1-46)。肝外 IVCA 与静脉血栓形成的相关风险高于肝内 IVCA(84 例患者中有 56 例 [67%] 与 38 例患者中有 9 例 [24%],几率比 5-31,95% CI 2-27-12-43;P解释:这项对大型患者队列的评估显示了 IVCA 的高血栓负担。我们发现了两种不同形式的 IVCA:肝内和肝外,这提示了不同的潜在机制。除了临床特征外,我们还提请人们注意这种孤儿病,并强调了研究和改善护理的必要性:西班牙血栓与止血学会、卡洛斯三世健康研究所、FEDER、Fundación Séneca。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thrombotic risk and features of patients with inferior vena cava agenesis: a multicentre, retrospective, observational study.

Background: Inferior vena cava agenesis (IVCA) is a rare anomaly predisposing affected people to lower-limb venous thrombosis with low frequency of pulmonary embolism. Antenatal thrombosis and inherited thrombophilia have been suggested as causes of IVCA. However, there is little evidence on the clinical course and management of this condition. We designed a patient registry to assess the thrombotic risk and features of IVCA.

Methods: In this this multicentre, retrospective, observational study, we included patients with IVCA diagnosed by routine imaging from 20 hospitals in Spain (n=18), Portugal (n=1), and Italy (n=1). Patients were identified from a systematic search in radiology databases using data extraction software (cohort A) and alternative searches in medical records for confirmed IVCA (cohort B; option allowed when systematic approaches were unapplicable). Primary outcomes were clinical and imaging features, thrombotic risk, phenotype of IVCA-associated thrombosis, anticoagulant treatment, and the results of thrombophilia testing.

Findings: We included patients with IVCA diagnosed by routine imaging studies done between Jan 1, 2010, and Dec 31, 2022. In the systematic search, 4 341 333 imaging exams were screened from the radiology databases of eight centres. 122 eligible patients were enrolled in cohort A. A further 95 patients were identified by screening medical records at 12 centres, of whom 88 were eligible and included in cohort B, making a combined cohort of 210 patients. 96 (46%) of 210 patients were female and 200 (95%) were European or Hispanic. 60 (29%) of 210 patients had hepatic IVC interruption, whereas 150 (71%) had extrahepatic IVCA. In cohort A, 65 (53%) of 122 patients had venous thrombosis, with an estimated annual risk of 1·15% (95% CI 0·89-1·46). Extrahepatic IVCA was associated with a greater risk of venous thrombosis than hepatic IVCA (56 [67%] of 84 patients vs nine [24%] of 38 patients, odds ratio 5·31, 95% CI 2·27-12·43; p<0·0001). Analysis of 126 patients with venous thrombosis pooled from cohorts A and B showed early-onset (median age 34·6 years, IQR 23·3-54·3) and recurrent events (50 [40%] of 126 patients). Patients with extrahepatic IVCA had greater proportions of lower-limb venous thrombosis (95 [87%] of 109 vs nine [53%] of 17, p=0·0010) and recurrence (48 [44%] of 109 vs two [12%] of 17, p=0·015), but lower rates of pulmonary embolism (10 [10%] of 99 vs four [33%] of 12, p=0·044) than did patients with hepatic IVCA. 77 (63%) of 122 patients with thrombosis underwent indefinite anticoagulation. 32 (29%) of 111 patients (29 [34%] of 86 with thrombosis) had coexisting thrombophilias. The recurrence risk was lower for patients receiving indefinite anticoagulation (adjusted odds ratio 0·24, 95% CI 0·08-0·61; p=0·010), and greater for thrombophilias (3·19, 1·09-9·32; p=0·034).

Interpretation: This evaluation of a large patient cohort demonstrates the high thrombotic burden of IVCA. We have identified two distinct forms of IVCA, hepatic and extrahepatic, suggesting different underlying mechanisms. Beyond clinical characterisation, we draw attention to this orphan disease and highlight the need for its study and improved care.

Funding: Spanish Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, FEDER, Fundación Séneca.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Haematology
Lancet Haematology HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
26.00
自引率
0.80%
发文量
323
期刊介绍: Launched in autumn 2014, The Lancet Haematology is part of the Lancet specialty journals, exclusively available online. This monthly journal is committed to publishing original research that not only sheds light on haematological clinical practice but also advocates for change within the field. Aligned with the Lancet journals' tradition of high-impact research, The Lancet Haematology aspires to achieve a similar standing and reputation within its discipline. It upholds the rigorous reporting standards characteristic of all Lancet titles, ensuring a consistent commitment to quality in its contributions to the field of haematology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信