我应该把它做成圆形吗?圆形和线形布局对矩阵和连接数据比较任务的适用性

IF 2.7 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
E. Ståhlbom, J. Molin, A. Ynnerman, C. Lundström
{"title":"我应该把它做成圆形吗?圆形和线形布局对矩阵和连接数据比较任务的适用性","authors":"E. Ståhlbom,&nbsp;J. Molin,&nbsp;A. Ynnerman,&nbsp;C. Lundström","doi":"10.1111/cgf.15102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Visual representations based on circular shapes are frequently used in visualization applications. One example are circos plots within bioinformatics, which bend graphs into a wheel of information with connective lines running through the center like spokes. The results are aesthetically appealing and impressive visualizations that fit long data sequences into a small quadratic space. However, the authors' experiences are that when asked, a visualization researcher would generally advise against making visualizations with radial layouts. Upon reviewing the literature we found that there is evidence that circular layouts are preferable in some cases, but we found no clear evidence for what layout is preferable for matrices and connective data in particular, which both are common data types in circos plots. In this work, we thus performed a user study to compare circular and linear layouts. The tasks are inspired by genomics data, but our results generalize to many other application areas, involving comparison and connective data. To build the prototype we utilized Gosling, a grammar for visualizing genomics data. We contribute empirical evidence on the suitedness of linear versus circular layouts, adding to the specific and general knowledge concerning perception of circular graphs. In addition, we contribute a case study evaluation of the grammar Gosling as a rapid prototyping language, confirming its utility and providing guidance on suitable areas for future development.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10687,"journal":{"name":"Computer Graphics Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cgf.15102","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should I make it round? Suitability of circular and linear layouts for comparative tasks with matrix and connective data\",\"authors\":\"E. Ståhlbom,&nbsp;J. Molin,&nbsp;A. Ynnerman,&nbsp;C. Lundström\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cgf.15102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Visual representations based on circular shapes are frequently used in visualization applications. One example are circos plots within bioinformatics, which bend graphs into a wheel of information with connective lines running through the center like spokes. The results are aesthetically appealing and impressive visualizations that fit long data sequences into a small quadratic space. However, the authors' experiences are that when asked, a visualization researcher would generally advise against making visualizations with radial layouts. Upon reviewing the literature we found that there is evidence that circular layouts are preferable in some cases, but we found no clear evidence for what layout is preferable for matrices and connective data in particular, which both are common data types in circos plots. In this work, we thus performed a user study to compare circular and linear layouts. The tasks are inspired by genomics data, but our results generalize to many other application areas, involving comparison and connective data. To build the prototype we utilized Gosling, a grammar for visualizing genomics data. We contribute empirical evidence on the suitedness of linear versus circular layouts, adding to the specific and general knowledge concerning perception of circular graphs. In addition, we contribute a case study evaluation of the grammar Gosling as a rapid prototyping language, confirming its utility and providing guidance on suitable areas for future development.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Graphics Forum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cgf.15102\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Graphics Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cgf.15102\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Graphics Forum","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cgf.15102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可视化应用中经常使用基于圆形的可视化表示法。生物信息学中的环形图就是一个例子,它将图形弯曲成一个信息轮,连接线像辐条一样穿过中心。这样的可视化效果既美观又令人印象深刻,能将长数据序列放入一个较小的二次空间。然而,根据作者的经验,当被问及此事时,可视化研究人员一般会建议不要使用径向布局进行可视化。在查阅文献后,我们发现有证据表明圆形布局在某些情况下更为可取,但对于矩阵和连接数据(这两种数据都是环形图中常见的数据类型),我们并没有发现明确的证据表明哪种布局更为可取。因此,在这项工作中,我们进行了一项用户研究,以比较圆形布局和线性布局。这些任务受到基因组学数据的启发,但我们的结果也适用于许多其他应用领域,包括比较和连接数据。为了构建原型,我们使用了基因组学数据可视化语法 Gosling。我们提供了关于线性布局与圆形布局适用性的经验证据,补充了有关圆形图形感知的具体和一般知识。此外,我们还对作为快速原型语言的 Gosling 语法进行了案例研究评估,证实了它的实用性,并为未来开发的合适领域提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Should I make it round? Suitability of circular and linear layouts for comparative tasks with matrix and connective data

Should I make it round? Suitability of circular and linear layouts for comparative tasks with matrix and connective data

Visual representations based on circular shapes are frequently used in visualization applications. One example are circos plots within bioinformatics, which bend graphs into a wheel of information with connective lines running through the center like spokes. The results are aesthetically appealing and impressive visualizations that fit long data sequences into a small quadratic space. However, the authors' experiences are that when asked, a visualization researcher would generally advise against making visualizations with radial layouts. Upon reviewing the literature we found that there is evidence that circular layouts are preferable in some cases, but we found no clear evidence for what layout is preferable for matrices and connective data in particular, which both are common data types in circos plots. In this work, we thus performed a user study to compare circular and linear layouts. The tasks are inspired by genomics data, but our results generalize to many other application areas, involving comparison and connective data. To build the prototype we utilized Gosling, a grammar for visualizing genomics data. We contribute empirical evidence on the suitedness of linear versus circular layouts, adding to the specific and general knowledge concerning perception of circular graphs. In addition, we contribute a case study evaluation of the grammar Gosling as a rapid prototyping language, confirming its utility and providing guidance on suitable areas for future development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computer Graphics Forum
Computer Graphics Forum 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Graphics Forum is the official journal of Eurographics, published in cooperation with Wiley-Blackwell, and is a unique, international source of information for computer graphics professionals interested in graphics developments worldwide. It is now one of the leading journals for researchers, developers and users of computer graphics in both commercial and academic environments. The journal reports on the latest developments in the field throughout the world and covers all aspects of the theory, practice and application of computer graphics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信