同步冲击波与顺应壁的相互作用:实验表征和气动弹性建模

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
C. Riveiro Moreno , M. Couliou , N. Fabbiane , R. Bur , O. Marquet
{"title":"同步冲击波与顺应壁的相互作用:实验表征和气动弹性建模","authors":"C. Riveiro Moreno ,&nbsp;M. Couliou ,&nbsp;N. Fabbiane ,&nbsp;R. Bur ,&nbsp;O. Marquet","doi":"10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2024.104142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The static and dynamic interaction of a normal shock wave (upstream Mach number 1.35) with a compliant wall is characterized experimentally by schlieren visualizations and an optical displacement sensor. Depending on the location of the shock wave along the compliant wall, three different regimes of interaction are found: large-amplitude synchronized regime, small-amplitude synchronized regime and unsynchronized regime. The regime of large-amplitude synchronized oscillations is found for shock locations close to the mid-point of the compliant wall along the streamwise direction; at this location, the coupled system locks to the second vibration frequency of the structure. Three regimes of small-amplitude synchronized oscillations are found depending on the shock position. When the shock is located upstream the center of the compliant wall, the shock may oscillate either periodically at the frequency of the first vibration mode or quasi-periodically with highest amplitudes at the three frequencies of the vibration modes. When the shock is located downstream the center of the compliant wall, the shock oscillates periodically at the frequency of the third vibration mode. Finally, close to the trailing edge of the compliant wall, the shock oscillation is not synchronized with the compliant wall which oscillates with a very small amplitude. An empirical model is proposed to investigate the energy exchange between the flow and the compliant wall during the limit cycle oscillations. A negative aerodynamic damping – and, hence, the possibility of a limit cycle – is observed when a sufficiently extended separation is considered in the model for the pressure distribution at the wall.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fluids and Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088997462400077X/pdfft?md5=99f79a674d3bc707715d170d9d544237&pid=1-s2.0-S088997462400077X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synchronized shock wave and compliant wall interactions: Experimental characterization and aeroelastic modeling\",\"authors\":\"C. Riveiro Moreno ,&nbsp;M. Couliou ,&nbsp;N. Fabbiane ,&nbsp;R. Bur ,&nbsp;O. Marquet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2024.104142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The static and dynamic interaction of a normal shock wave (upstream Mach number 1.35) with a compliant wall is characterized experimentally by schlieren visualizations and an optical displacement sensor. Depending on the location of the shock wave along the compliant wall, three different regimes of interaction are found: large-amplitude synchronized regime, small-amplitude synchronized regime and unsynchronized regime. The regime of large-amplitude synchronized oscillations is found for shock locations close to the mid-point of the compliant wall along the streamwise direction; at this location, the coupled system locks to the second vibration frequency of the structure. Three regimes of small-amplitude synchronized oscillations are found depending on the shock position. When the shock is located upstream the center of the compliant wall, the shock may oscillate either periodically at the frequency of the first vibration mode or quasi-periodically with highest amplitudes at the three frequencies of the vibration modes. When the shock is located downstream the center of the compliant wall, the shock oscillates periodically at the frequency of the third vibration mode. Finally, close to the trailing edge of the compliant wall, the shock oscillation is not synchronized with the compliant wall which oscillates with a very small amplitude. An empirical model is proposed to investigate the energy exchange between the flow and the compliant wall during the limit cycle oscillations. A negative aerodynamic damping – and, hence, the possibility of a limit cycle – is observed when a sufficiently extended separation is considered in the model for the pressure distribution at the wall.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Fluids and Structures\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088997462400077X/pdfft?md5=99f79a674d3bc707715d170d9d544237&pid=1-s2.0-S088997462400077X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Fluids and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088997462400077X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fluids and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088997462400077X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过施利勒可视化和光学位移传感器,对正常冲击波(上游马赫数为 1.35)与顺壁的静态和动态相互作用进行了实验研究。根据冲击波沿顺应壁的位置,发现了三种不同的相互作用机制:大振幅同步机制、小振幅同步机制和非同步机制。大振幅同步振荡机制出现在冲击波沿流向方向靠近顺应壁中点的位置;在该位置,耦合系统锁定结构的第二振动频率。根据冲击位置的不同,小振幅同步振荡可分为三种情况。当冲击波位于顺应壁中心的上游时,冲击波可能以第一振动模式的频率周期性振荡,或以三个振动模式频率的最高振幅准周期性振荡。当冲击波位于顺应壁中心的下游时,冲击波以第三振动模式的频率周期性振荡。最后,在顺应壁后缘附近,冲击振荡与顺应壁不同步,振幅很小。我们提出了一个经验模型来研究极限循环振荡期间气流与顺应壁之间的能量交换。如果在模型中考虑了足够大的壁面压力分布分离,就会观察到负的空气动力阻尼,因此也就有可能出现极限循环。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Synchronized shock wave and compliant wall interactions: Experimental characterization and aeroelastic modeling

The static and dynamic interaction of a normal shock wave (upstream Mach number 1.35) with a compliant wall is characterized experimentally by schlieren visualizations and an optical displacement sensor. Depending on the location of the shock wave along the compliant wall, three different regimes of interaction are found: large-amplitude synchronized regime, small-amplitude synchronized regime and unsynchronized regime. The regime of large-amplitude synchronized oscillations is found for shock locations close to the mid-point of the compliant wall along the streamwise direction; at this location, the coupled system locks to the second vibration frequency of the structure. Three regimes of small-amplitude synchronized oscillations are found depending on the shock position. When the shock is located upstream the center of the compliant wall, the shock may oscillate either periodically at the frequency of the first vibration mode or quasi-periodically with highest amplitudes at the three frequencies of the vibration modes. When the shock is located downstream the center of the compliant wall, the shock oscillates periodically at the frequency of the third vibration mode. Finally, close to the trailing edge of the compliant wall, the shock oscillation is not synchronized with the compliant wall which oscillates with a very small amplitude. An empirical model is proposed to investigate the energy exchange between the flow and the compliant wall during the limit cycle oscillations. A negative aerodynamic damping – and, hence, the possibility of a limit cycle – is observed when a sufficiently extended separation is considered in the model for the pressure distribution at the wall.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Fluids and Structures
Journal of Fluids and Structures 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
173
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Fluids and Structures serves as a focal point and a forum for the exchange of ideas, for the many kinds of specialists and practitioners concerned with fluid–structure interactions and the dynamics of systems related thereto, in any field. One of its aims is to foster the cross–fertilization of ideas, methods and techniques in the various disciplines involved. The journal publishes papers that present original and significant contributions on all aspects of the mechanical interactions between fluids and solids, regardless of scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信