因无症状颈动脉狭窄而接受介入治疗的患者缺乏最佳的药物治疗,而最佳的药物治疗可防止大面积脑梗死的发生。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Vascular Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1177/17085381241262927
Katherine Teter, Loes Willems, Keerthi Harish, Bruck Negash, Michiel Warle, Caron Rockman, Jose Torres, Koto Ishida, Glenn Jacobowitz, Karan Garg, Thomas Maldonado
{"title":"因无症状颈动脉狭窄而接受介入治疗的患者缺乏最佳的药物治疗,而最佳的药物治疗可防止大面积脑梗死的发生。","authors":"Katherine Teter, Loes Willems, Keerthi Harish, Bruck Negash, Michiel Warle, Caron Rockman, Jose Torres, Koto Ishida, Glenn Jacobowitz, Karan Garg, Thomas Maldonado","doi":"10.1177/17085381241262927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesCarotid interventions are indicated for both patients with symptomatic and a subset of patients with severe asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (CAS). Symptomatic CAS accounts for up to 12%-25% of overall carotid interventions, but predictors of symptomatic presentation remain poorly defined. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with symptomatic CAS in our patient population.MethodsBetween January 2015 and February 2022, an institutional retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data on patients undergoing interventions for CAS was performed. Procedures included carotid endarterectomy (CEA), transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TF-CAS). Demographic data, comorbidities, procedural details, and anatomic features from various imaging modalities were collected. Comparisons were made between symptomatic (symptoms within the prior 6 months) and asymptomatic patients.ResultsDuring the study period, 279 patients who underwent intervention for symptomatic CAS were paired with a randomly selected cohort of 300 patients who underwent intervention for asymptomatic CAS from a total patient cohort of 1143 patients undergoing interventions for asymptomatic CAS. Demographic data did not differ between groups. Patients with symptomatic CAS more frequently had prior TIA/stroke (>6 months remote to the current event), but less frequently had coronary artery disease or chronic kidney disease and were less likely to receive adequate medical management including antihypertensive agents, lipid-lowering agents, and anti-platelet therapy. On multivariate analysis, remote prior TIA/stroke and lack of anti-platelet therapy remained significant. Among symptomatic patients presenting with stroke, lack of anti-platelet therapy was associated with an overall larger area of parenchymal involvement. No difference was observed with single versus dual anti-platelet therapy. Furthermore, symptomatic patients were more likely to have ulcerated plaques (30.9% vs 18%, <i>p</i> < .001), and symptomatic patients with ulcerated plaques more frequently had less than 50% compared to moderate/severe CAS. Nine patients who presented with symptoms had mild CAS and underwent intervention.ConclusionsSymptomatic CAS was associated with a history of remote prior symptoms and lack of anti-platelet therapy at time of presentation. Furthermore, symptomatic patients not on anti-platelet agents were more likely to have a greater area of parenchymal involvement when presenting with stroke and symptomatic patients with ulcerated plaques were more likely to have mild CAS, suggesting the role of plaque instability in symptomatic presentation. These findings underscore the importance of appropriate medical management and adherence in all patients with CAS and perhaps a role for more frequent surveillance in those with potentially unstable plaque morphology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"870-878"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal medical therapy is lacking in patients undergoing intervention for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis and protects against larger areas of cerebral infarction.\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Teter, Loes Willems, Keerthi Harish, Bruck Negash, Michiel Warle, Caron Rockman, Jose Torres, Koto Ishida, Glenn Jacobowitz, Karan Garg, Thomas Maldonado\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17085381241262927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectivesCarotid interventions are indicated for both patients with symptomatic and a subset of patients with severe asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (CAS). Symptomatic CAS accounts for up to 12%-25% of overall carotid interventions, but predictors of symptomatic presentation remain poorly defined. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with symptomatic CAS in our patient population.MethodsBetween January 2015 and February 2022, an institutional retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data on patients undergoing interventions for CAS was performed. Procedures included carotid endarterectomy (CEA), transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TF-CAS). Demographic data, comorbidities, procedural details, and anatomic features from various imaging modalities were collected. Comparisons were made between symptomatic (symptoms within the prior 6 months) and asymptomatic patients.ResultsDuring the study period, 279 patients who underwent intervention for symptomatic CAS were paired with a randomly selected cohort of 300 patients who underwent intervention for asymptomatic CAS from a total patient cohort of 1143 patients undergoing interventions for asymptomatic CAS. Demographic data did not differ between groups. Patients with symptomatic CAS more frequently had prior TIA/stroke (>6 months remote to the current event), but less frequently had coronary artery disease or chronic kidney disease and were less likely to receive adequate medical management including antihypertensive agents, lipid-lowering agents, and anti-platelet therapy. On multivariate analysis, remote prior TIA/stroke and lack of anti-platelet therapy remained significant. Among symptomatic patients presenting with stroke, lack of anti-platelet therapy was associated with an overall larger area of parenchymal involvement. No difference was observed with single versus dual anti-platelet therapy. Furthermore, symptomatic patients were more likely to have ulcerated plaques (30.9% vs 18%, <i>p</i> < .001), and symptomatic patients with ulcerated plaques more frequently had less than 50% compared to moderate/severe CAS. Nine patients who presented with symptoms had mild CAS and underwent intervention.ConclusionsSymptomatic CAS was associated with a history of remote prior symptoms and lack of anti-platelet therapy at time of presentation. Furthermore, symptomatic patients not on anti-platelet agents were more likely to have a greater area of parenchymal involvement when presenting with stroke and symptomatic patients with ulcerated plaques were more likely to have mild CAS, suggesting the role of plaque instability in symptomatic presentation. These findings underscore the importance of appropriate medical management and adherence in all patients with CAS and perhaps a role for more frequent surveillance in those with potentially unstable plaque morphology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"870-878\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381241262927\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381241262927","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:颈动脉介入治疗既适用于有症状的患者,也适用于无症状的严重颈动脉狭窄(CAS)患者。在所有颈动脉介入治疗中,无症状 CAS 占 12%-25% 之多,但无症状表现的预测因素仍不明确。本研究的目的是在我们的患者群体中找出与无症状CAS相关的因素:方法:2015年1月至2022年2月期间,对前瞻性收集的接受CAS介入治疗的患者数据进行了一项机构回顾性队列研究。手术包括颈动脉内膜剥脱术(CEA)、经颈动脉血运重建术(TCAR)和经口颈动脉支架植入术(TF-CAS)。收集了人口统计学数据、合并症、手术细节以及各种成像模式的解剖特征。对有症状(前6个月内出现症状)和无症状的患者进行了比较:研究期间,从1143名接受无症状CAS介入治疗的患者队列中随机抽取了300名无症状CAS介入治疗患者,将其中279名接受有症状CAS介入治疗的患者与300名无症状CAS介入治疗患者配对。两组患者的人口统计学数据无差异。无症状CAS患者更多曾发生过TIA/中风(与本次事件相距超过6个月),但较少患有冠状动脉疾病或慢性肾脏疾病,也较少接受适当的药物治疗,包括降压药、降脂药和抗血小板治疗。在多变量分析中,远端既往 TIA/中风和缺乏抗血小板治疗仍具有重要意义。在有症状的卒中患者中,缺乏抗血小板治疗与实质受累的总体面积较大有关。单抗血小板治疗与双抗血小板治疗没有差异。此外,有症状的患者更有可能出现溃疡斑块(30.9% 对 18%,P<0.001),与中度/重度 CAS 相比,有症状的溃疡斑块患者更常出现 50%以下的溃疡斑块。9名出现症状的患者患有轻度CAS,并接受了干预治疗:无症状CAS与既往远期症状史和发病时未接受抗血小板治疗有关。此外,未服用抗血小板药物的无症状患者在出现卒中时实质受累面积更大,斑块溃疡的无症状患者更有可能患有轻度CAS,这表明斑块不稳定性在无症状表现中的作用。这些发现强调了对所有 CAS 患者进行适当的医疗管理和坚持治疗的重要性,对于斑块形态可能不稳定的患者,或许需要进行更频繁的监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal medical therapy is lacking in patients undergoing intervention for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis and protects against larger areas of cerebral infarction.

ObjectivesCarotid interventions are indicated for both patients with symptomatic and a subset of patients with severe asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (CAS). Symptomatic CAS accounts for up to 12%-25% of overall carotid interventions, but predictors of symptomatic presentation remain poorly defined. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with symptomatic CAS in our patient population.MethodsBetween January 2015 and February 2022, an institutional retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data on patients undergoing interventions for CAS was performed. Procedures included carotid endarterectomy (CEA), transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TF-CAS). Demographic data, comorbidities, procedural details, and anatomic features from various imaging modalities were collected. Comparisons were made between symptomatic (symptoms within the prior 6 months) and asymptomatic patients.ResultsDuring the study period, 279 patients who underwent intervention for symptomatic CAS were paired with a randomly selected cohort of 300 patients who underwent intervention for asymptomatic CAS from a total patient cohort of 1143 patients undergoing interventions for asymptomatic CAS. Demographic data did not differ between groups. Patients with symptomatic CAS more frequently had prior TIA/stroke (>6 months remote to the current event), but less frequently had coronary artery disease or chronic kidney disease and were less likely to receive adequate medical management including antihypertensive agents, lipid-lowering agents, and anti-platelet therapy. On multivariate analysis, remote prior TIA/stroke and lack of anti-platelet therapy remained significant. Among symptomatic patients presenting with stroke, lack of anti-platelet therapy was associated with an overall larger area of parenchymal involvement. No difference was observed with single versus dual anti-platelet therapy. Furthermore, symptomatic patients were more likely to have ulcerated plaques (30.9% vs 18%, p < .001), and symptomatic patients with ulcerated plaques more frequently had less than 50% compared to moderate/severe CAS. Nine patients who presented with symptoms had mild CAS and underwent intervention.ConclusionsSymptomatic CAS was associated with a history of remote prior symptoms and lack of anti-platelet therapy at time of presentation. Furthermore, symptomatic patients not on anti-platelet agents were more likely to have a greater area of parenchymal involvement when presenting with stroke and symptomatic patients with ulcerated plaques were more likely to have mild CAS, suggesting the role of plaque instability in symptomatic presentation. These findings underscore the importance of appropriate medical management and adherence in all patients with CAS and perhaps a role for more frequent surveillance in those with potentially unstable plaque morphology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular
Vascular 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信