在实践中优化质量改进方法:案例研究法。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Staci S Reynolds, Julee B Waldrop
{"title":"在实践中优化质量改进方法:案例研究法。","authors":"Staci S Reynolds, Julee B Waldrop","doi":"10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quality improvement (QI) initiatives help ensure patients are receiving high-quality care. Iterative Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles are used to test change. Data are evaluated over time, and tests of change can be modified or discarded as needed.</p><p><strong>Problem: </strong>Health care QI teams lack the flexibility to conduct PDSA cycles, often conducting pre/post quasi-experimental research studies instead.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>This article reviews a case study of a \"personal improvement\" initiative as an example of QI methods and data evaluation for an individual trying to lose weight. The purpose of this article is to provide guidance on best practices for conducting QI initiatives; common pitfalls that clinicians may face when leading their own QI initiatives are identified and recommendations to overcome these challenges are discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Concepts from this case study, along with supplemental resources provided, can help clinicians optimize QI methodologies in the health care setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":16931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing care quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Quality Improvement Methods in Practice: A Case Study Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Staci S Reynolds, Julee B Waldrop\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quality improvement (QI) initiatives help ensure patients are receiving high-quality care. Iterative Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles are used to test change. Data are evaluated over time, and tests of change can be modified or discarded as needed.</p><p><strong>Problem: </strong>Health care QI teams lack the flexibility to conduct PDSA cycles, often conducting pre/post quasi-experimental research studies instead.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>This article reviews a case study of a \\\"personal improvement\\\" initiative as an example of QI methods and data evaluation for an individual trying to lose weight. The purpose of this article is to provide guidance on best practices for conducting QI initiatives; common pitfalls that clinicians may face when leading their own QI initiatives are identified and recommendations to overcome these challenges are discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Concepts from this case study, along with supplemental resources provided, can help clinicians optimize QI methodologies in the health care setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nursing care quality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nursing care quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000785\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing care quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000785","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:质量改进(QI)计划有助于确保患者获得高质量的护理。迭代计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)周期用于测试变革。问题:医疗质量改进团队缺乏开展 PDSA 循环的灵活性,通常会开展前/后准实验研究:本文回顾了一个关于 "个人改进 "倡议的案例研究,以一个试图减肥的人为例,介绍了 QI 方法和数据评估。本文旨在为开展质量改进措施的最佳实践提供指导;指出临床医生在领导自己的质量改进措施时可能面临的常见误区,并讨论克服这些挑战的建议:结论:本案例研究中的概念以及提供的补充资源可帮助临床医生优化医疗环境中的 QI 方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing Quality Improvement Methods in Practice: A Case Study Approach.

Background: Quality improvement (QI) initiatives help ensure patients are receiving high-quality care. Iterative Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles are used to test change. Data are evaluated over time, and tests of change can be modified or discarded as needed.

Problem: Health care QI teams lack the flexibility to conduct PDSA cycles, often conducting pre/post quasi-experimental research studies instead.

Approach: This article reviews a case study of a "personal improvement" initiative as an example of QI methods and data evaluation for an individual trying to lose weight. The purpose of this article is to provide guidance on best practices for conducting QI initiatives; common pitfalls that clinicians may face when leading their own QI initiatives are identified and recommendations to overcome these challenges are discussed.

Conclusions: Concepts from this case study, along with supplemental resources provided, can help clinicians optimize QI methodologies in the health care setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nursing Care Quality (JNCQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides practicing nurses as well as nurses who have leadership roles in nursing care quality programs with useful information regarding the application of quality principles and concepts in the practice setting. The journal offers a forum for the scholarly discussion of “real world” implementation of quality activities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信