肠道准备完成时间对肠道清洁效果的影响:不同结肠镜检查前肠道准备完成时间的前瞻性随机对照试验。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hye Min Kim, Hyo Suk Kim, Young Eun An, Jae Hyuck Chang, Tae Ho Kim, Chang Whan Kim, Tae-Geun Gweon
{"title":"肠道准备完成时间对肠道清洁效果的影响:不同结肠镜检查前肠道准备完成时间的前瞻性随机对照试验。","authors":"Hye Min Kim,&nbsp;Hyo Suk Kim,&nbsp;Young Eun An,&nbsp;Jae Hyuck Chang,&nbsp;Tae Ho Kim,&nbsp;Chang Whan Kim,&nbsp;Tae-Geun Gweon","doi":"10.1111/den.14830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The elapse time between the completion of bowel cleansing and colonoscopy is one of the important factors for proper bowel cleansing. Although several studies have reported that a short time interval resulted in a favorable bowel cleansing, no randomized controlled trial (RCT) has been conducted to determine the effect of the elapse time. Consequently, we performed an RCT to investigate the efficacy of bowel preparation of participants who underwent colonoscopy according to the different time intervals between the completion of bowel preparation and colonoscopy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this single-center RCT, study participants were randomized to complete bowel preparation either 2–4 h or 4–8 h before colonoscopy. The primary end-point was successful bowel preparation, rated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 504 individuals were included (2–4 h, 255; 4–8 h, 249). The rate of successful bowel preparation in the 2–4 h group showed noninferiority compared with that of the 4–8 h group (97.6% vs. 95.2%; rate difference, 2.5% [−0.8% to 5.7%]; <i>P</i><sub>for noninferiority</sub> <i>&lt;</i> 0.001, <i>P</i><sub>for superiority</sub> = 0.136). The rate for perfect cleansing (a BBPS score of 9) was higher in the 2–4 h group (56.5% vs. 39.8%, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>When bowel cleansing was finished 2–4 h before the start of colonoscopy, the overall bowel cleansing was noninferior, and perfect cleansing was superior, compared to that when cleansing was finished 4–8 h before colonoscopy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":159,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Endoscopy","volume":"36 12","pages":"1347-1354"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of bowel preparation completion time on bowel cleansing efficacy: Prospective randomized controlled trial of different bowel preparation completion times precolonoscopy\",\"authors\":\"Hye Min Kim,&nbsp;Hyo Suk Kim,&nbsp;Young Eun An,&nbsp;Jae Hyuck Chang,&nbsp;Tae Ho Kim,&nbsp;Chang Whan Kim,&nbsp;Tae-Geun Gweon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/den.14830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The elapse time between the completion of bowel cleansing and colonoscopy is one of the important factors for proper bowel cleansing. Although several studies have reported that a short time interval resulted in a favorable bowel cleansing, no randomized controlled trial (RCT) has been conducted to determine the effect of the elapse time. Consequently, we performed an RCT to investigate the efficacy of bowel preparation of participants who underwent colonoscopy according to the different time intervals between the completion of bowel preparation and colonoscopy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this single-center RCT, study participants were randomized to complete bowel preparation either 2–4 h or 4–8 h before colonoscopy. The primary end-point was successful bowel preparation, rated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 504 individuals were included (2–4 h, 255; 4–8 h, 249). The rate of successful bowel preparation in the 2–4 h group showed noninferiority compared with that of the 4–8 h group (97.6% vs. 95.2%; rate difference, 2.5% [−0.8% to 5.7%]; <i>P</i><sub>for noninferiority</sub> <i>&lt;</i> 0.001, <i>P</i><sub>for superiority</sub> = 0.136). The rate for perfect cleansing (a BBPS score of 9) was higher in the 2–4 h group (56.5% vs. 39.8%, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>When bowel cleansing was finished 2–4 h before the start of colonoscopy, the overall bowel cleansing was noninferior, and perfect cleansing was superior, compared to that when cleansing was finished 4–8 h before colonoscopy.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"36 12\",\"pages\":\"1347-1354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638469/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/den.14830\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/den.14830","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:完成肠道清洁和结肠镜检查之间的间隔时间是正确清洁肠道的重要因素之一。虽然有几项研究报告称,较短的时间间隔会带来良好的肠道清洁效果,但还没有随机对照试验(RCT)来确定间隔时间的影响。因此,我们进行了一项随机对照试验,根据完成肠道准备和结肠镜检查之间的不同时间间隔,研究接受结肠镜检查者肠道准备的效果:在这项单中心 RCT 中,研究参与者被随机分配在结肠镜检查前 2-4 小时或 4-8 小时完成肠道准备。主要终点是成功的肠道准备,使用波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)进行评分:结果:共纳入 504 人(2-4 小时,255 人;4-8 小时,249 人)。与 4-8 小时组相比,2-4 小时组的肠道准备成功率无劣势(97.6% 对 95.2%;比率差异,2.5% [-0.8% 至 5.7%];无劣势对优越性的 P = 0.136)。2-4小时组的完全洁净率(BBPS评分为9分)更高(56.5%对39.8%,P 结论:2-4小时组的完全洁净率(BBPS评分为9分)更高(56.5%对39.8%,P 结论):与结肠镜检查开始前4-8小时完成肠道清洁相比,结肠镜检查开始前2-4小时完成肠道清洁的总体效果不劣于结肠镜检查开始前4-8小时完成肠道清洁的效果,而完全清洁的效果优于结肠镜检查开始前4-8小时完成肠道清洁的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of bowel preparation completion time on bowel cleansing efficacy: Prospective randomized controlled trial of different bowel preparation completion times precolonoscopy

Effect of bowel preparation completion time on bowel cleansing efficacy: Prospective randomized controlled trial of different bowel preparation completion times precolonoscopy

Objectives

The elapse time between the completion of bowel cleansing and colonoscopy is one of the important factors for proper bowel cleansing. Although several studies have reported that a short time interval resulted in a favorable bowel cleansing, no randomized controlled trial (RCT) has been conducted to determine the effect of the elapse time. Consequently, we performed an RCT to investigate the efficacy of bowel preparation of participants who underwent colonoscopy according to the different time intervals between the completion of bowel preparation and colonoscopy.

Methods

In this single-center RCT, study participants were randomized to complete bowel preparation either 2–4 h or 4–8 h before colonoscopy. The primary end-point was successful bowel preparation, rated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS).

Results

A total of 504 individuals were included (2–4 h, 255; 4–8 h, 249). The rate of successful bowel preparation in the 2–4 h group showed noninferiority compared with that of the 4–8 h group (97.6% vs. 95.2%; rate difference, 2.5% [−0.8% to 5.7%]; Pfor noninferiority< 0.001, Pfor superiority = 0.136). The rate for perfect cleansing (a BBPS score of 9) was higher in the 2–4 h group (56.5% vs. 39.8%, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

When bowel cleansing was finished 2–4 h before the start of colonoscopy, the overall bowel cleansing was noninferior, and perfect cleansing was superior, compared to that when cleansing was finished 4–8 h before colonoscopy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Endoscopy
Digestive Endoscopy 医学-外科
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
15.10%
发文量
291
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Digestive Endoscopy (DEN) is the official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, the Asian Pacific Society for Digestive Endoscopy and the World Endoscopy Organization. Digestive Endoscopy serves as a medium for presenting original articles that offer significant contributions to knowledge in the broad field of endoscopy. The Journal also includes Reviews, Original Articles, How I Do It, Case Reports (only of exceptional interest and novelty are accepted), Letters, Techniques and Images, abstracts and news items that may be of interest to endoscopists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信