Arndt Vogel, Anna Saborowski, Patrick Wenzel, Henning Wege, Gunnar Folprecht, Albrecht Kretzschmar, Philipp Schütt, Lutz Jacobasch, Nicolas Ziegenhagen, Stefan Boeck, Danmei Zhang, Stephan Kanzler, Sebastian Belle, Johannes Mohm, Eray Gökkurt, Christian Lerchenmüller, Ullrich Graeven, Daniel Pink, Thorsten Götze, Martha M Kirstein
{"title":"纳米脂质体伊立替康和氟尿嘧啶加亮菌甲素与氟尿嘧啶加亮菌甲素治疗曾接受过吉西他滨疗法治疗的胆管癌和胆囊癌患者(AIO NALIRICC):一项多中心、开放标签、随机、2 期试验。","authors":"Arndt Vogel, Anna Saborowski, Patrick Wenzel, Henning Wege, Gunnar Folprecht, Albrecht Kretzschmar, Philipp Schütt, Lutz Jacobasch, Nicolas Ziegenhagen, Stefan Boeck, Danmei Zhang, Stephan Kanzler, Sebastian Belle, Johannes Mohm, Eray Gökkurt, Christian Lerchenmüller, Ullrich Graeven, Daniel Pink, Thorsten Götze, Martha M Kirstein","doi":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00119-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is an unmet need for effective therapies in pretreated advanced biliary tract cancer. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of nanoliposomal irinotecan and fluorouracil plus leucovorin compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin as second-line treatment for biliary tract cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>NALIRICC was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial done in 17 German centres for patients aged 18 years or older, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, metastatic biliary tract cancer, and progression on gemcitabine-based therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous infusions of nanoliposomal irinotecan (70 mg/m<sup>2</sup>), fluorouracil (2400 mg/m<sup>2</sup>), and leucovorin (400 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) every 2 weeks (nanoliposomal irinotecan group) or fluorouracil (2400 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) plus leucovorin (400 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) every 2 weeks (control group). Randomisation was by permutated block randomisation in block sizes of four, stratified by primary tumour site. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival was the primary endpoint, which was evaluated in all randomly assigned patients. Secondary efficacy outcomes were overall survival, objective response rate, and quality of life. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Enrolment for this trial has been completed, and it is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03043547.</p><p><strong>Finding: </strong>Between Dec 4, 2017, and Aug 2, 2021, 49 patients were randomly assigned to the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 51 patients to the control group. Median age was 65 years (IQR 59-71); 45 (45%) of 100 patients were female. Median progression-free survival was 2·6 months (95% CI 1·7-3·6) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 2·3 months (1·6-3·4) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·87 [0·56-1·35]). Median overall survival was 6·9 months (95% CI 5·3-10·6) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 8·2 months (5·4-11·9) in the control group (HR 1·08 [0·68-1·72]). The objective response rate was 14% (95% CI 6-27; seven patients) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 4% (1-14; two patients) in the control group. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group were neutropenia (eight [17%] of 48 vs none in the control group), diarrhoea (seven [15%] vs one [2%]), and nausea (four [8%] vs none). In the control group, the most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were cholangitis (four [8%] patients vs none in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group) and bile duct stenosis (four [8%] vs three [6%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 16 (33%) patients in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group (grade 2-3 diarrhoea in five patients; one case each of abdominal infection, acute kidney injury, pancytopenia, increased blood bilirubin, colitis, dehydration, dyspnoea, infectious enterocolitis, ileus, oral mucositis, and nausea). One (2%) treatment-related serious adverse event occurred in the control group (worsening of general condition). Median duration until deterioration of global health status, characterised by the time from randomisation to the initial observation of a score decline exceeding 10 points, was 4·0 months (95% CI 2·2-not reached) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 3·7 months (2·7-not reached) in the control group.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The addition of nanoliposomal irinotecan to fluorouracil plus leucovorin did not improve progression-free survival or overall survival and was associated with higher toxicity compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin. Further research is necessary to define the role of irinotecan-based combinations in second-line treatment of biliary tract cancer.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Servier and AIO-Studien.</p>","PeriodicalId":30,"journal":{"name":"Biomacromolecules","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nanoliposomal irinotecan and fluorouracil plus leucovorin versus fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapies (AIO NALIRICC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial.\",\"authors\":\"Arndt Vogel, Anna Saborowski, Patrick Wenzel, Henning Wege, Gunnar Folprecht, Albrecht Kretzschmar, Philipp Schütt, Lutz Jacobasch, Nicolas Ziegenhagen, Stefan Boeck, Danmei Zhang, Stephan Kanzler, Sebastian Belle, Johannes Mohm, Eray Gökkurt, Christian Lerchenmüller, Ullrich Graeven, Daniel Pink, Thorsten Götze, Martha M Kirstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00119-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is an unmet need for effective therapies in pretreated advanced biliary tract cancer. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of nanoliposomal irinotecan and fluorouracil plus leucovorin compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin as second-line treatment for biliary tract cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>NALIRICC was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial done in 17 German centres for patients aged 18 years or older, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, metastatic biliary tract cancer, and progression on gemcitabine-based therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous infusions of nanoliposomal irinotecan (70 mg/m<sup>2</sup>), fluorouracil (2400 mg/m<sup>2</sup>), and leucovorin (400 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) every 2 weeks (nanoliposomal irinotecan group) or fluorouracil (2400 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) plus leucovorin (400 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) every 2 weeks (control group). Randomisation was by permutated block randomisation in block sizes of four, stratified by primary tumour site. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival was the primary endpoint, which was evaluated in all randomly assigned patients. Secondary efficacy outcomes were overall survival, objective response rate, and quality of life. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Enrolment for this trial has been completed, and it is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03043547.</p><p><strong>Finding: </strong>Between Dec 4, 2017, and Aug 2, 2021, 49 patients were randomly assigned to the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 51 patients to the control group. Median age was 65 years (IQR 59-71); 45 (45%) of 100 patients were female. Median progression-free survival was 2·6 months (95% CI 1·7-3·6) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 2·3 months (1·6-3·4) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·87 [0·56-1·35]). Median overall survival was 6·9 months (95% CI 5·3-10·6) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 8·2 months (5·4-11·9) in the control group (HR 1·08 [0·68-1·72]). The objective response rate was 14% (95% CI 6-27; seven patients) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 4% (1-14; two patients) in the control group. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group were neutropenia (eight [17%] of 48 vs none in the control group), diarrhoea (seven [15%] vs one [2%]), and nausea (four [8%] vs none). In the control group, the most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were cholangitis (four [8%] patients vs none in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group) and bile duct stenosis (four [8%] vs three [6%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 16 (33%) patients in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group (grade 2-3 diarrhoea in five patients; one case each of abdominal infection, acute kidney injury, pancytopenia, increased blood bilirubin, colitis, dehydration, dyspnoea, infectious enterocolitis, ileus, oral mucositis, and nausea). One (2%) treatment-related serious adverse event occurred in the control group (worsening of general condition). Median duration until deterioration of global health status, characterised by the time from randomisation to the initial observation of a score decline exceeding 10 points, was 4·0 months (95% CI 2·2-not reached) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 3·7 months (2·7-not reached) in the control group.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The addition of nanoliposomal irinotecan to fluorouracil plus leucovorin did not improve progression-free survival or overall survival and was associated with higher toxicity compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin. Further research is necessary to define the role of irinotecan-based combinations in second-line treatment of biliary tract cancer.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Servier and AIO-Studien.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomacromolecules\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomacromolecules\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00119-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomacromolecules","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00119-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:晚期胆道癌的预处理需要有效的治疗方法。我们旨在评估纳米脂质体伊立替康和氟尿嘧啶加白血病素与氟尿嘧啶加白血病素作为胆道癌二线治疗的疗效:NALIRICC是一项多中心、开放标签、随机的2期试验,在德国的17个中心进行,对象为18岁或18岁以上、东部合作肿瘤学组表现状态为0-1、转移性胆道癌、吉西他滨治疗进展的患者。患者被随机分配(1:1)接受每两周一次的纳米脂质体伊立替康(70 毫克/平方米)、氟尿嘧啶(2400 毫克/平方米)和亮菌素(400 毫克/平方米)静脉注射(纳米脂质体伊立替康组)或每两周一次的氟尿嘧啶(2400 毫克/平方米)加亮菌素(400 毫克/平方米)静脉注射(对照组)。随机化方法是按原发肿瘤部位进行分层,以四人为一组进行包块随机化。研究者评估的无进展生存期是主要终点,对所有随机分配的患者进行评估。次要疗效指标包括总生存期、客观反应率和生活质量。对所有随机分配的、至少接受过一次治疗的患者进行了安全性评估。该试验的注册工作已经完成,并在ClinicalTrials.gov进行了注册,编号为NCT03043547.Finding:2017年12月4日至2021年8月2日期间,49名患者被随机分配到纳米脂质体伊立替康组,51名患者被随机分配到对照组。中位年龄为65岁(IQR为59-71);100名患者中有45名(45%)为女性。纳米脂质体伊立替康组的中位无进展生存期为2-6个月(95% CI 1-7-3-6),对照组为2-3个月(1-6-3-4)(危险比[HR] 0-87 [0-56-1-35])。纳米脂质体伊立替康组的中位总生存期为6-9个月(95% CI 5-3-10-6),对照组为8-2个月(5-4-11-9)(HR 1-08 [0-68-1-72])。纳米脂质体伊立替康组的客观反应率为14%(95% CI 6-27;7例患者),对照组为4%(1-14;2例患者)。纳米脂质体伊立替康组最常见的3级或更严重不良反应是中性粒细胞减少(48例中有8例[17%],对照组无)、腹泻(7例[15%],对照组1例[2%])和恶心(4例[8%],对照组无)。在对照组中,最常见的3级或更严重不良反应是胆管炎(4例[8%]患者对纳米脂质体伊立替康组无不良反应)和胆管狭窄(4例[8%]对3例[6%])。纳米脂质体伊立替康组 16 例(33%)患者发生了与治疗相关的严重不良事件(5 例患者出现 2-3 级腹泻;腹腔感染、急性肾损伤、泛发性胆红素增高、结肠炎、脱水、呼吸困难、感染性小肠结肠炎、回肠炎、口腔粘膜炎和恶心各 1 例)。对照组发生了一起(2%)与治疗相关的严重不良事件(全身状况恶化)。纳米脂质体伊立替康组的总体健康状况恶化持续时间中位数为4-0个月(95% CI 2-2-未达到),对照组为3-7个月(2-7-未达到):纳米脂质体伊立替康与氟尿嘧啶加亮菌甲素相比,在氟尿嘧啶加亮菌甲素的基础上加用纳米脂质体伊立替康并不能改善无进展生存期或总生存期,而且毒性更高。有必要开展进一步研究,以确定伊立替康联合疗法在胆道癌二线治疗中的作用:资金来源:Servier和AIO-Studien。
Nanoliposomal irinotecan and fluorouracil plus leucovorin versus fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapies (AIO NALIRICC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial.
Background: There is an unmet need for effective therapies in pretreated advanced biliary tract cancer. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of nanoliposomal irinotecan and fluorouracil plus leucovorin compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin as second-line treatment for biliary tract cancer.
Methods: NALIRICC was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial done in 17 German centres for patients aged 18 years or older, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, metastatic biliary tract cancer, and progression on gemcitabine-based therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous infusions of nanoliposomal irinotecan (70 mg/m2), fluorouracil (2400 mg/m2), and leucovorin (400 mg/m2) every 2 weeks (nanoliposomal irinotecan group) or fluorouracil (2400 mg/m2) plus leucovorin (400 mg/m2) every 2 weeks (control group). Randomisation was by permutated block randomisation in block sizes of four, stratified by primary tumour site. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival was the primary endpoint, which was evaluated in all randomly assigned patients. Secondary efficacy outcomes were overall survival, objective response rate, and quality of life. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Enrolment for this trial has been completed, and it is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03043547.
Finding: Between Dec 4, 2017, and Aug 2, 2021, 49 patients were randomly assigned to the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 51 patients to the control group. Median age was 65 years (IQR 59-71); 45 (45%) of 100 patients were female. Median progression-free survival was 2·6 months (95% CI 1·7-3·6) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 2·3 months (1·6-3·4) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·87 [0·56-1·35]). Median overall survival was 6·9 months (95% CI 5·3-10·6) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 8·2 months (5·4-11·9) in the control group (HR 1·08 [0·68-1·72]). The objective response rate was 14% (95% CI 6-27; seven patients) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 4% (1-14; two patients) in the control group. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group were neutropenia (eight [17%] of 48 vs none in the control group), diarrhoea (seven [15%] vs one [2%]), and nausea (four [8%] vs none). In the control group, the most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were cholangitis (four [8%] patients vs none in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group) and bile duct stenosis (four [8%] vs three [6%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 16 (33%) patients in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group (grade 2-3 diarrhoea in five patients; one case each of abdominal infection, acute kidney injury, pancytopenia, increased blood bilirubin, colitis, dehydration, dyspnoea, infectious enterocolitis, ileus, oral mucositis, and nausea). One (2%) treatment-related serious adverse event occurred in the control group (worsening of general condition). Median duration until deterioration of global health status, characterised by the time from randomisation to the initial observation of a score decline exceeding 10 points, was 4·0 months (95% CI 2·2-not reached) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 3·7 months (2·7-not reached) in the control group.
Interpretation: The addition of nanoliposomal irinotecan to fluorouracil plus leucovorin did not improve progression-free survival or overall survival and was associated with higher toxicity compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin. Further research is necessary to define the role of irinotecan-based combinations in second-line treatment of biliary tract cancer.
期刊介绍:
Biomacromolecules is a leading forum for the dissemination of cutting-edge research at the interface of polymer science and biology. Submissions to Biomacromolecules should contain strong elements of innovation in terms of macromolecular design, synthesis and characterization, or in the application of polymer materials to biology and medicine.
Topics covered by Biomacromolecules include, but are not exclusively limited to: sustainable polymers, polymers based on natural and renewable resources, degradable polymers, polymer conjugates, polymeric drugs, polymers in biocatalysis, biomacromolecular assembly, biomimetic polymers, polymer-biomineral hybrids, biomimetic-polymer processing, polymer recycling, bioactive polymer surfaces, original polymer design for biomedical applications such as immunotherapy, drug delivery, gene delivery, antimicrobial applications, diagnostic imaging and biosensing, polymers in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, polymeric scaffolds and hydrogels for cell culture and delivery.