粪便捐献者筛选过程的经济和时间优化。

IF 1.9 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
MDM Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2024-06-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23814683241254809
Bar Levy, Naomi Fliss Isakov, Tomer Ziv-Baran, Moshe Leshno, Nitsan Maharshak, Lael Werner
{"title":"粪便捐献者筛选过程的经济和时间优化。","authors":"Bar Levy, Naomi Fliss Isakov, Tomer Ziv-Baran, Moshe Leshno, Nitsan Maharshak, Lael Werner","doi":"10.1177/23814683241254809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background.</b> Fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) is the delivery of fecal microbiome, isolated from healthy donors, into a patient's gastrointestinal tract. FMT is a safe and efficient treatment for recurrent <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection. Donors undergo strict screening to avoid disease transmission. This consists of several blood and stool tests, which are performed in a multistage, costly process. We performed a cost-minimizing analysis to find the optimal order in which the tests should be performed. <b>Methods.</b> An algorithm to optimize the order of tests in terms of cost was defined. Performance analysis for disqualifying a potential healthy donor was carried out on data sets based on either the published literature or our real-life data. For both data sets, we calculated the total cost to qualify a single donor according to the optimal order of tests, suggested by the algorithm. <b>Results.</b> Applying the algorithm to the published literature revealed potential savings of 94.2% of the cost of screening a potential donor and 7.05% of the cost to qualify a single donor. In our cohort of 87 volunteers, 53 were not eligible for donation. Of 34 potential donors, 10 were disqualified due to abnormal lab tests. Applying our algorithm to optimize the order of tests, the average cost for screening a potential donor resulted in potential savings of 49.9% and a 21.3% savings in the cost to qualify a single donor. <b>Conclusions.</b> Improving the order and timing of the screening tests of potential FMT stool donors can decrease the costs by about 50% per subject.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>What is known:Fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) is the transfer of microbiome from healthy donors to patients.Fecal donors undergo multiple strict screening tests to exclude any transmissible disease.Screening tests of potential fecal donors is expensive and time consuming.FMT is the most efficient treatment for recurrent <i>C difficile</i> infection.What is new here:An algorithm to optimize the order of donors' screening tests in terms of cost was defined.Optimizing the order tests can save nearly 50% in costs of screening a potential donor.</p>","PeriodicalId":36567,"journal":{"name":"MDM Policy and Practice","volume":"9 1","pages":"23814683241254809"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11171430/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic and Chronologic Optimization of Fecal Donors Screening Process.\",\"authors\":\"Bar Levy, Naomi Fliss Isakov, Tomer Ziv-Baran, Moshe Leshno, Nitsan Maharshak, Lael Werner\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23814683241254809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background.</b> Fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) is the delivery of fecal microbiome, isolated from healthy donors, into a patient's gastrointestinal tract. FMT is a safe and efficient treatment for recurrent <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection. Donors undergo strict screening to avoid disease transmission. This consists of several blood and stool tests, which are performed in a multistage, costly process. We performed a cost-minimizing analysis to find the optimal order in which the tests should be performed. <b>Methods.</b> An algorithm to optimize the order of tests in terms of cost was defined. Performance analysis for disqualifying a potential healthy donor was carried out on data sets based on either the published literature or our real-life data. For both data sets, we calculated the total cost to qualify a single donor according to the optimal order of tests, suggested by the algorithm. <b>Results.</b> Applying the algorithm to the published literature revealed potential savings of 94.2% of the cost of screening a potential donor and 7.05% of the cost to qualify a single donor. In our cohort of 87 volunteers, 53 were not eligible for donation. Of 34 potential donors, 10 were disqualified due to abnormal lab tests. Applying our algorithm to optimize the order of tests, the average cost for screening a potential donor resulted in potential savings of 49.9% and a 21.3% savings in the cost to qualify a single donor. <b>Conclusions.</b> Improving the order and timing of the screening tests of potential FMT stool donors can decrease the costs by about 50% per subject.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>What is known:Fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) is the transfer of microbiome from healthy donors to patients.Fecal donors undergo multiple strict screening tests to exclude any transmissible disease.Screening tests of potential fecal donors is expensive and time consuming.FMT is the most efficient treatment for recurrent <i>C difficile</i> infection.What is new here:An algorithm to optimize the order of donors' screening tests in terms of cost was defined.Optimizing the order tests can save nearly 50% in costs of screening a potential donor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MDM Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"23814683241254809\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11171430/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MDM Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683241254809\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683241254809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。粪便微生物移植(FMT)是从健康捐献者体内分离出的粪便微生物组,将其送入患者的胃肠道。粪便微生物移植是一种安全有效的治疗艰难梭菌反复感染的方法。捐献者要经过严格筛选,以避免疾病传播。这包括几项血液和粪便检测,这些检测需要经过多个阶段,费用高昂。我们进行了成本最小化分析,以找出进行这些检查的最佳顺序。方法。定义了一种从成本角度优化检测顺序的算法。根据已发表的文献或我们的实际数据集,对取消潜在健康捐献者资格的性能进行了分析。对于这两个数据集,我们根据算法建议的最佳检测顺序计算了单个供体合格的总成本。结果。将该算法应用到已发表的文献中,可以节省 94.2% 的潜在捐献者筛查成本和 7.05% 的单个捐献者鉴定成本。在我们的 87 名志愿者中,有 53 人不符合捐献条件。在 34 名潜在捐献者中,有 10 人因实验室检查异常而被取消捐献资格。采用我们的算法优化检查顺序后,筛查一名潜在捐献者的平均成本可节省 49.9%,鉴定一名捐献者资格的成本可节省 21.3%。结论改进粪便微生物学潜在供体筛查试验的顺序和时间,可使每位受试者的成本降低约 50%:已知信息:粪便微生物移植(FMT)是将健康供体的微生物组转移给患者。粪便供体需要接受多项严格的筛查测试,以排除任何可传播的疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic and Chronologic Optimization of Fecal Donors Screening Process.

Background. Fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) is the delivery of fecal microbiome, isolated from healthy donors, into a patient's gastrointestinal tract. FMT is a safe and efficient treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. Donors undergo strict screening to avoid disease transmission. This consists of several blood and stool tests, which are performed in a multistage, costly process. We performed a cost-minimizing analysis to find the optimal order in which the tests should be performed. Methods. An algorithm to optimize the order of tests in terms of cost was defined. Performance analysis for disqualifying a potential healthy donor was carried out on data sets based on either the published literature or our real-life data. For both data sets, we calculated the total cost to qualify a single donor according to the optimal order of tests, suggested by the algorithm. Results. Applying the algorithm to the published literature revealed potential savings of 94.2% of the cost of screening a potential donor and 7.05% of the cost to qualify a single donor. In our cohort of 87 volunteers, 53 were not eligible for donation. Of 34 potential donors, 10 were disqualified due to abnormal lab tests. Applying our algorithm to optimize the order of tests, the average cost for screening a potential donor resulted in potential savings of 49.9% and a 21.3% savings in the cost to qualify a single donor. Conclusions. Improving the order and timing of the screening tests of potential FMT stool donors can decrease the costs by about 50% per subject.

Highlights: What is known:Fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) is the transfer of microbiome from healthy donors to patients.Fecal donors undergo multiple strict screening tests to exclude any transmissible disease.Screening tests of potential fecal donors is expensive and time consuming.FMT is the most efficient treatment for recurrent C difficile infection.What is new here:An algorithm to optimize the order of donors' screening tests in terms of cost was defined.Optimizing the order tests can save nearly 50% in costs of screening a potential donor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MDM Policy and Practice
MDM Policy and Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信