食管癌内镜下切除术后转移性复发的风险因素和模式。

IF 2.6 3区 医学
Ippei Tanaka, Waku Hatta, Tomoyuki Koike, So Takahashi, Tomohiro Shimada, Takuto Hikichi, Yosuke Toya, Yusuke Onozato, Koichi Hamada, Daisuke Fukushi, Ko Watanabe, Shoichi Kayaba, Hirotaka Ito, Tetsuya Tatsuta, Tomoyuki Oikawa, Yasushi Takahashi, Yutaka Kondo, Tetsuro Yoshimura, Takeharu Shiroki, Ko Nagino, Norihiro Hanabata, Akira Funakubo, Tetsuya Ohira, Jun Nakamura, Tomohiro Nakamura, Naoki Nakaya, Katsunori Iijima, Takayuki Matsumoto, Shinsaku Fukuda, Atsushi Masamune, Dai Hirasawa
{"title":"食管癌内镜下切除术后转移性复发的风险因素和模式。","authors":"Ippei Tanaka, Waku Hatta, Tomoyuki Koike, So Takahashi, Tomohiro Shimada, Takuto Hikichi, Yosuke Toya, Yusuke Onozato, Koichi Hamada, Daisuke Fukushi, Ko Watanabe, Shoichi Kayaba, Hirotaka Ito, Tetsuya Tatsuta, Tomoyuki Oikawa, Yasushi Takahashi, Yutaka Kondo, Tetsuro Yoshimura, Takeharu Shiroki, Ko Nagino, Norihiro Hanabata, Akira Funakubo, Tetsuya Ohira, Jun Nakamura, Tomohiro Nakamura, Naoki Nakaya, Katsunori Iijima, Takayuki Matsumoto, Shinsaku Fukuda, Atsushi Masamune, Dai Hirasawa","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although esophageal cancers invading the muscularis mucosa (pT1a-MM) or submucosa (pT1b-SM) after endoscopic resection (ER) are associated with a risk of lymph node metastasis, details of metastatic recurrence after additional treatment remain unknown. We aimed to identify the risk factors for metastatic recurrence and recurrence patterns in patients receiving additional treatment after ER for esophageal cancer. Between 2006 and 2017, patients with pT1a-MM/pT1b-SM esophageal cancer who underwent ER with additional treatment (esophagectomy, chemoradiotherapy [CRT], and radiation therapy) at 21 institutions in Japan were enrolled. We evaluated the risk factors for metastatic recurrence after ER with additional treatment. Subsequently, the rate and pattern (locoregional or distant) of metastatic recurrence were investigated for each additional treatment. Of the 220 patients who received additional treatment, 57, 125, and 38 underwent esophagectomy, CRT, and radiation therapy, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, lymphatic invasion was the sole risk factor for metastatic recurrence after additional treatment (hazard ratio, 3.50; P = 0.029). Although the risk of metastatic recurrence with additional esophagectomy was similar to that with CRT (hazard ratio, 1.01; P = 0.986), the rate of locoregional recurrence tended to be higher with additional esophagectomy (80.0% (4/5) vs. 36.4% (4/11)), leading to a better prognosis in patients with metastatic recurrence after additional esophagectomy than CRT (survival rate, 80.0% (4/5) vs. 9.1% (1/11)). Patients with lymphatic invasion have a high risk of metastatic recurrence after ER with additional treatment for pT1a-MM/pT1b-SM esophageal cancer. Additional esophagectomy may result in a better prognosis after metastatic recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors and pattern of metastatic recurrence after endoscopic resection with additional treatment for esophageal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Ippei Tanaka, Waku Hatta, Tomoyuki Koike, So Takahashi, Tomohiro Shimada, Takuto Hikichi, Yosuke Toya, Yusuke Onozato, Koichi Hamada, Daisuke Fukushi, Ko Watanabe, Shoichi Kayaba, Hirotaka Ito, Tetsuya Tatsuta, Tomoyuki Oikawa, Yasushi Takahashi, Yutaka Kondo, Tetsuro Yoshimura, Takeharu Shiroki, Ko Nagino, Norihiro Hanabata, Akira Funakubo, Tetsuya Ohira, Jun Nakamura, Tomohiro Nakamura, Naoki Nakaya, Katsunori Iijima, Takayuki Matsumoto, Shinsaku Fukuda, Atsushi Masamune, Dai Hirasawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/dote/doae048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although esophageal cancers invading the muscularis mucosa (pT1a-MM) or submucosa (pT1b-SM) after endoscopic resection (ER) are associated with a risk of lymph node metastasis, details of metastatic recurrence after additional treatment remain unknown. We aimed to identify the risk factors for metastatic recurrence and recurrence patterns in patients receiving additional treatment after ER for esophageal cancer. Between 2006 and 2017, patients with pT1a-MM/pT1b-SM esophageal cancer who underwent ER with additional treatment (esophagectomy, chemoradiotherapy [CRT], and radiation therapy) at 21 institutions in Japan were enrolled. We evaluated the risk factors for metastatic recurrence after ER with additional treatment. Subsequently, the rate and pattern (locoregional or distant) of metastatic recurrence were investigated for each additional treatment. Of the 220 patients who received additional treatment, 57, 125, and 38 underwent esophagectomy, CRT, and radiation therapy, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, lymphatic invasion was the sole risk factor for metastatic recurrence after additional treatment (hazard ratio, 3.50; P = 0.029). Although the risk of metastatic recurrence with additional esophagectomy was similar to that with CRT (hazard ratio, 1.01; P = 0.986), the rate of locoregional recurrence tended to be higher with additional esophagectomy (80.0% (4/5) vs. 36.4% (4/11)), leading to a better prognosis in patients with metastatic recurrence after additional esophagectomy than CRT (survival rate, 80.0% (4/5) vs. 9.1% (1/11)). Patients with lymphatic invasion have a high risk of metastatic recurrence after ER with additional treatment for pT1a-MM/pT1b-SM esophageal cancer. Additional esophagectomy may result in a better prognosis after metastatic recurrence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases of the Esophagus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases of the Esophagus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae048\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然内镜切除术(ER)后侵犯粘膜肌层(pT1a-MM)或粘膜下层(pT1b-SM)的食管癌与淋巴结转移的风险有关,但额外治疗后转移性复发的详细情况仍不清楚。我们旨在确定食管癌ER术后接受额外治疗的患者转移性复发的风险因素和复发模式。2006 年至 2017 年间,日本 21 家机构对接受 ER 后附加治疗(食管切除术、化学放疗 [CRT] 和放射治疗)的 pT1a-MM/pT1b-SM 食管癌患者进行了登记。我们评估了ER附加治疗后转移性复发的风险因素。随后,我们对每种额外治疗的转移性复发率和模式(局部或远处)进行了调查。在接受附加治疗的 220 名患者中,分别有 57 人、125 人和 38 人接受了食管切除术、CRT 和放疗。在多变量分析中,淋巴侵犯是额外治疗后转移性复发的唯一风险因素(危险比为 3.50;P = 0.029)。虽然附加食管切除术的转移性复发风险与 CRT 相似(危险比,1.01;P = 0.986),但附加食管切除术的局部复发率往往更高(80.0% (4/5) vs. 36.4% (4/11)),导致附加食管切除术后转移性复发患者的预后优于 CRT(生存率,80.0% (4/5) vs. 9.1% (1/11))。pT1a-MM/pT1b-SM食管癌患者在接受ER附加治疗后,淋巴受侵患者转移性复发的风险很高。在转移性复发后,额外的食管切除术可能会带来更好的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk factors and pattern of metastatic recurrence after endoscopic resection with additional treatment for esophageal cancer.

Although esophageal cancers invading the muscularis mucosa (pT1a-MM) or submucosa (pT1b-SM) after endoscopic resection (ER) are associated with a risk of lymph node metastasis, details of metastatic recurrence after additional treatment remain unknown. We aimed to identify the risk factors for metastatic recurrence and recurrence patterns in patients receiving additional treatment after ER for esophageal cancer. Between 2006 and 2017, patients with pT1a-MM/pT1b-SM esophageal cancer who underwent ER with additional treatment (esophagectomy, chemoradiotherapy [CRT], and radiation therapy) at 21 institutions in Japan were enrolled. We evaluated the risk factors for metastatic recurrence after ER with additional treatment. Subsequently, the rate and pattern (locoregional or distant) of metastatic recurrence were investigated for each additional treatment. Of the 220 patients who received additional treatment, 57, 125, and 38 underwent esophagectomy, CRT, and radiation therapy, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, lymphatic invasion was the sole risk factor for metastatic recurrence after additional treatment (hazard ratio, 3.50; P = 0.029). Although the risk of metastatic recurrence with additional esophagectomy was similar to that with CRT (hazard ratio, 1.01; P = 0.986), the rate of locoregional recurrence tended to be higher with additional esophagectomy (80.0% (4/5) vs. 36.4% (4/11)), leading to a better prognosis in patients with metastatic recurrence after additional esophagectomy than CRT (survival rate, 80.0% (4/5) vs. 9.1% (1/11)). Patients with lymphatic invasion have a high risk of metastatic recurrence after ER with additional treatment for pT1a-MM/pT1b-SM esophageal cancer. Additional esophagectomy may result in a better prognosis after metastatic recurrence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diseases of the Esophagus
Diseases of the Esophagus Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
7.70%
发文量
568
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Esophagus covers all aspects of the esophagus - etiology, investigation and diagnosis, and both medical and surgical treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信