Genome size and chromosome number are critical metrics for accurate genome assembly assessment in Eukaryota.

The number of genome assemblies has rapidly increased in recent history, with NCBI databases reaching over 41,000 eukaryotic genome assemblies across about 2,300 species. Increases in read length and improvements in assembly algorithms have led to increased contiguity and larger genome assemblies. While this number of assemblies is impressive, only about a third of these assemblies have corresponding genome size estimations for their respective species on publicly available databases. In this paper, genome assemblies are assessed regarding their total size compared to their respective publicly available genome size estimations. These deviations in size are assessed related to genome size, kingdom, sequencing platform, and standard assembly metrics, such as N50 and BUSCO values. A large proportion of assemblies deviate from their estimated genome size by more than 10%, with increasing deviations in size with increased genome size, suggesting nonprotein coding and structural DNA may be to blame. Modest differences in performance of sequencing platforms are noted as well. While standard metrics of genome assessment are more likely to indicate an assembly approaching the estimated genome size, much of the variation in this deviation in size is not explained with these raw metrics. A new, proportional N50 metric is proposed, in which N50 values are made relative to the average chromosome size of each species. This new metric has a stronger relationship with complete genome assemblies and, due to its proportional nature, allows for a more direct comparison across assemblies for genomes with variation in sizes and architectures.