使用 DAST 测量评估颈椎和胸椎手术中患者专用螺钉导向模板系统的准确性和安全阈值。

IF 1.2 Q3 SURGERY
Spine Surgery and Related Research Pub Date : 2023-12-27 eCollection Date: 2024-05-27 DOI:10.22603/ssrr.2023-0154
Shuichi Kaneyama, Taku Sugawara
{"title":"使用 DAST 测量评估颈椎和胸椎手术中患者专用螺钉导向模板系统的准确性和安全阈值。","authors":"Shuichi Kaneyama, Taku Sugawara","doi":"10.22603/ssrr.2023-0154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To analyze the reliability of the newly developed patient-specific Screw Guide Template (SGT) system as an intraoperative navigation device for spinal screw insertion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We attempted to place 428 screws for 51 patients. The accuracy of the screw track was assessed by deviation of the screw axis from the preplanned trajectory on postoperative CT. The safety of the screw insertion was evaluated by the bone breach of the screw. The bone diameter available for screw trajectory (DAST) was measured, and the relations to the bone breach were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the inserted screws, 98.4% were defined as accurate, and 94.6% were contained in the target bone. In the cervical spine, the screw deviation between breaching (0.57 mm) and contained screws (0.43 mm) did not significantly differ, whereas DAST for breaching screws (3.62 mm) was significantly smaller than contained screws (5.33 mm) (p<0.001). Cervical screws with ≥4.0 mm DAST showed a significantly lower incidence of bone breach (0.4%) than ≤3.9 mm DAST (28.3%) (p<0.001). In the thoracic spine, screw deviation and DAST had significant differences between breaching (1.54 mm, 4.41 mm) and contained (0.75 mm, 6.07 mm) (p<0.001). The incidence of the breach was significantly lower in thoracic screws with ≥5.0 mm (1.9%) than ≤4.9 (21.9%) DAST (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that our SGT system could support precise screw insertion for 98.4% accuracy and 94.6% safety. DAST was recommended to be ≥4.0 and ≥5.0 mm in the cervical and thoracic spines for safe screw insertion.</p>","PeriodicalId":22253,"journal":{"name":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","volume":"8 3","pages":"297-305"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11165503/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Accuracy and Safety Thresholds of Patient-Specific Screw Guide Template System in Cervical and Thoracic Spine Surgeries Using DAST Measurements.\",\"authors\":\"Shuichi Kaneyama, Taku Sugawara\",\"doi\":\"10.22603/ssrr.2023-0154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To analyze the reliability of the newly developed patient-specific Screw Guide Template (SGT) system as an intraoperative navigation device for spinal screw insertion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We attempted to place 428 screws for 51 patients. The accuracy of the screw track was assessed by deviation of the screw axis from the preplanned trajectory on postoperative CT. The safety of the screw insertion was evaluated by the bone breach of the screw. The bone diameter available for screw trajectory (DAST) was measured, and the relations to the bone breach were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the inserted screws, 98.4% were defined as accurate, and 94.6% were contained in the target bone. In the cervical spine, the screw deviation between breaching (0.57 mm) and contained screws (0.43 mm) did not significantly differ, whereas DAST for breaching screws (3.62 mm) was significantly smaller than contained screws (5.33 mm) (p<0.001). Cervical screws with ≥4.0 mm DAST showed a significantly lower incidence of bone breach (0.4%) than ≤3.9 mm DAST (28.3%) (p<0.001). In the thoracic spine, screw deviation and DAST had significant differences between breaching (1.54 mm, 4.41 mm) and contained (0.75 mm, 6.07 mm) (p<0.001). The incidence of the breach was significantly lower in thoracic screws with ≥5.0 mm (1.9%) than ≤4.9 (21.9%) DAST (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that our SGT system could support precise screw insertion for 98.4% accuracy and 94.6% safety. DAST was recommended to be ≥4.0 and ≥5.0 mm in the cervical and thoracic spines for safe screw insertion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine Surgery and Related Research\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"297-305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11165503/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine Surgery and Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2023-0154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2023-0154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内容简介分析新开发的患者特异性螺钉导向模板(SGT)系统作为脊柱螺钉植入术中导航设备的可靠性:方法:我们尝试为 51 名患者植入 428 颗螺钉。方法:我们尝试为 51 名患者置入 428 颗螺钉,通过术后 CT 显示的螺钉轴线偏离预先计划的轨迹来评估螺钉轨迹的准确性。根据螺钉的骨质破坏情况评估螺钉植入的安全性。测量了可用于螺钉轨迹的骨直径(DAST),并分析了与骨破损的关系:结果:在插入的螺钉中,98.4%被定义为准确,94.6%包含在目标骨中。在颈椎中,破骨螺钉(0.57 毫米)和含骨螺钉(0.43 毫米)之间的螺钉偏差没有显著差异,而破骨螺钉(3.62 毫米)的 DAST 则明显小于含骨螺钉(5.33 毫米)(p结论:这项研究表明,我们的 SGT 系统可以支持精确的螺钉插入,准确率达 98.4%,安全性达 94.6%。建议颈椎和胸椎的 DAST ≥4.0 mm 和 ≥5.0 mm,以确保螺钉插入的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Accuracy and Safety Thresholds of Patient-Specific Screw Guide Template System in Cervical and Thoracic Spine Surgeries Using DAST Measurements.

Introduction: To analyze the reliability of the newly developed patient-specific Screw Guide Template (SGT) system as an intraoperative navigation device for spinal screw insertion.

Methods: We attempted to place 428 screws for 51 patients. The accuracy of the screw track was assessed by deviation of the screw axis from the preplanned trajectory on postoperative CT. The safety of the screw insertion was evaluated by the bone breach of the screw. The bone diameter available for screw trajectory (DAST) was measured, and the relations to the bone breach were analyzed.

Results: In the inserted screws, 98.4% were defined as accurate, and 94.6% were contained in the target bone. In the cervical spine, the screw deviation between breaching (0.57 mm) and contained screws (0.43 mm) did not significantly differ, whereas DAST for breaching screws (3.62 mm) was significantly smaller than contained screws (5.33 mm) (p<0.001). Cervical screws with ≥4.0 mm DAST showed a significantly lower incidence of bone breach (0.4%) than ≤3.9 mm DAST (28.3%) (p<0.001). In the thoracic spine, screw deviation and DAST had significant differences between breaching (1.54 mm, 4.41 mm) and contained (0.75 mm, 6.07 mm) (p<0.001). The incidence of the breach was significantly lower in thoracic screws with ≥5.0 mm (1.9%) than ≤4.9 (21.9%) DAST (p<0.001).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that our SGT system could support precise screw insertion for 98.4% accuracy and 94.6% safety. DAST was recommended to be ≥4.0 and ≥5.0 mm in the cervical and thoracic spines for safe screw insertion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信