严重急性呼吸道感染重症患者的无创通气。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Ghaida Jabri, Farah Alotaibi, Amjad M Ahmed, Jesna Jose, Farhan Z Alenezi, Musharaf Sadat, Felwa Bin Humaid, Fahad Al-Hameed, Javed Memon, Kasim Al Khatib, Abdullah M Alsuayb, Mohammed AlObaidi, Mohammed Al Mutairi, Ahmad A Alanaizi, Fuad Alghamdi, Yaseen M Arabi
{"title":"严重急性呼吸道感染重症患者的无创通气。","authors":"Ghaida Jabri, Farah Alotaibi, Amjad M Ahmed, Jesna Jose, Farhan Z Alenezi, Musharaf Sadat, Felwa Bin Humaid, Fahad Al-Hameed, Javed Memon, Kasim Al Khatib, Abdullah M Alsuayb, Mohammed AlObaidi, Mohammed Al Mutairi, Ahmad A Alanaizi, Fuad Alghamdi, Yaseen M Arabi","doi":"10.4187/respcare.11286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between noninvasive ventilation (NIV) compared with invasive ventilation and mortality in subjects with severe acute respiratory infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective multi-center study of subjects with severe acute respiratory infection treated with ventilatory support between September 2012 and June 2018. We compared the 90-d mortality of subjects managed initially with NIV (NIV group) with those managed with invasive ventilation only (invasive ventilation group), adjusting by propensity score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 383 subjects, 189 (49%) were in the NIV group and 194 (51%) were in the invasive ventilation group. Of the subjects initially treated with NIV, 117 (62%) were eventually intubated. Crude 90-d mortality was lower in the NIV group versus the invasive ventilation group (42 [22.2%] vs 77 [39.7%]; <i>P</i> < .001). After propensity score adjustment, NIV was associated with lower 90-d mortality than invasive ventilation (odds ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.38-0.76; <i>P</i> < .001). The association of NIV with mortality compared with invasive ventilation was not different across the studied subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In subjects with severe acute respiratory infection and acute respiratory failure, NIV was commonly used. NIV was associated with a lower 90-d mortality. The observed high failure rate suggests the need for further research to optimize patient selection and facilitate early recognition of NIV failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":"1138-1145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349588/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noninvasive Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Infections.\",\"authors\":\"Ghaida Jabri, Farah Alotaibi, Amjad M Ahmed, Jesna Jose, Farhan Z Alenezi, Musharaf Sadat, Felwa Bin Humaid, Fahad Al-Hameed, Javed Memon, Kasim Al Khatib, Abdullah M Alsuayb, Mohammed AlObaidi, Mohammed Al Mutairi, Ahmad A Alanaizi, Fuad Alghamdi, Yaseen M Arabi\",\"doi\":\"10.4187/respcare.11286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between noninvasive ventilation (NIV) compared with invasive ventilation and mortality in subjects with severe acute respiratory infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective multi-center study of subjects with severe acute respiratory infection treated with ventilatory support between September 2012 and June 2018. We compared the 90-d mortality of subjects managed initially with NIV (NIV group) with those managed with invasive ventilation only (invasive ventilation group), adjusting by propensity score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 383 subjects, 189 (49%) were in the NIV group and 194 (51%) were in the invasive ventilation group. Of the subjects initially treated with NIV, 117 (62%) were eventually intubated. Crude 90-d mortality was lower in the NIV group versus the invasive ventilation group (42 [22.2%] vs 77 [39.7%]; <i>P</i> < .001). After propensity score adjustment, NIV was associated with lower 90-d mortality than invasive ventilation (odds ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.38-0.76; <i>P</i> < .001). The association of NIV with mortality compared with invasive ventilation was not different across the studied subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In subjects with severe acute respiratory infection and acute respiratory failure, NIV was commonly used. NIV was associated with a lower 90-d mortality. The observed high failure rate suggests the need for further research to optimize patient selection and facilitate early recognition of NIV failure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1138-1145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349588/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11286\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11286","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估无创通气(NIV)与有创通气相比与严重急性呼吸道感染患者死亡率的关系:本研究旨在评估无创通气(NIV)与有创通气相比与重症急性呼吸道感染患者死亡率之间的关系:这是一项回顾性多中心研究,研究对象为 2012 年 9 月至 2018 年 6 月期间接受通气支持治疗的重症急性呼吸道感染患者。我们比较了最初使用 NIV(NIV 组)和仅使用有创通气(有创通气组)的受试者的 90 天死亡率,并根据倾向评分进行了调整:在 383 例受试者中,189 例(49%)属于 NIV 组,194 例(51%)属于有创通气组。在最初接受 NIV 治疗的受试者中,117 人(62%)最终插管。NIV 组的 90 天粗死亡率低于有创通气组(42 [22.2%] vs 77 [39.7%];P < .001)。经过倾向评分调整后,NIV 的 90 天死亡率低于有创通气(几率比 0.54,95% CI 0.38-0.76;P < .001)。与有创通气相比,NIV与死亡率的相关性在不同的研究亚组中没有差异:结论:在严重急性呼吸道感染和急性呼吸衰竭患者中,NIV是常用的通气方式。NIV 与较低的 90 天死亡率相关。观察到的高失败率表明,有必要开展进一步研究,以优化患者选择并促进对 NIV 失败的早期识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Noninvasive Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Infections.

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between noninvasive ventilation (NIV) compared with invasive ventilation and mortality in subjects with severe acute respiratory infection.

Methods: This was a retrospective multi-center study of subjects with severe acute respiratory infection treated with ventilatory support between September 2012 and June 2018. We compared the 90-d mortality of subjects managed initially with NIV (NIV group) with those managed with invasive ventilation only (invasive ventilation group), adjusting by propensity score.

Results: Of 383 subjects, 189 (49%) were in the NIV group and 194 (51%) were in the invasive ventilation group. Of the subjects initially treated with NIV, 117 (62%) were eventually intubated. Crude 90-d mortality was lower in the NIV group versus the invasive ventilation group (42 [22.2%] vs 77 [39.7%]; P < .001). After propensity score adjustment, NIV was associated with lower 90-d mortality than invasive ventilation (odds ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.38-0.76; P < .001). The association of NIV with mortality compared with invasive ventilation was not different across the studied subgroups.

Conclusions: In subjects with severe acute respiratory infection and acute respiratory failure, NIV was commonly used. NIV was associated with a lower 90-d mortality. The observed high failure rate suggests the need for further research to optimize patient selection and facilitate early recognition of NIV failure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信