美国先天性手部差异手术修复时机的特点。

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
HAND Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1177/15589447241257646
Olivia W Cummings, Daniel J Koh, Jungho Gong, Navya Baranwal, Nikhil Sobti, Loree Kalliainen
{"title":"美国先天性手部差异手术修复时机的特点。","authors":"Olivia W Cummings, Daniel J Koh, Jungho Gong, Navya Baranwal, Nikhil Sobti, Loree Kalliainen","doi":"10.1177/15589447241257646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Suggested timing of reconstruction of congenital hand differences varies widely. The goal of timely intervention is to achieve near-normal appearance and function. We evaluated national trends in surgical timing of congenital hand differences to determine whether interventions align with the literature. <b>Methods:</b> Recommended ages for surgical reconstruction were identified. The Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database was queried from 2012 to 2020 for children who underwent surgery for simple syndactyly (SS), complex syndactyly (CS), polydactyly, or congenital trigger finger. Subgroup analysis was conducted to assess whether the surgeon's subspecialty (plastic surgery vs orthopedic surgery, pediatric vs generalist) influenced the timing of repair. <b>Results:</b> Congenital trigger finger and CS reconstructions occurred largely within the recommended age range (73.8% and 52.2%, respectively). Polydactyly repairs primarily occurred earlier than the recommendations (54.0%). Timing of SS reconstruction was split, either occurring before (44.3%) or after (41.4%) the recommendations. For children with polydactyly, plastic surgeons were more likely to perform polydactyly reconstruction at a younger age compared with orthopedic surgeons (<i>P</i> = .0001). <b>Conclusions:</b> Established expert recommendations for the treatment of congenital hand differences are largely not followed in practice in the United States. This suggests that practice patterns may not be determined by the surgical literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":" ","pages":"1041-1047"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing the Timing of Surgical Repair of Congenital Hand Differences in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Olivia W Cummings, Daniel J Koh, Jungho Gong, Navya Baranwal, Nikhil Sobti, Loree Kalliainen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15589447241257646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Suggested timing of reconstruction of congenital hand differences varies widely. The goal of timely intervention is to achieve near-normal appearance and function. We evaluated national trends in surgical timing of congenital hand differences to determine whether interventions align with the literature. <b>Methods:</b> Recommended ages for surgical reconstruction were identified. The Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database was queried from 2012 to 2020 for children who underwent surgery for simple syndactyly (SS), complex syndactyly (CS), polydactyly, or congenital trigger finger. Subgroup analysis was conducted to assess whether the surgeon's subspecialty (plastic surgery vs orthopedic surgery, pediatric vs generalist) influenced the timing of repair. <b>Results:</b> Congenital trigger finger and CS reconstructions occurred largely within the recommended age range (73.8% and 52.2%, respectively). Polydactyly repairs primarily occurred earlier than the recommendations (54.0%). Timing of SS reconstruction was split, either occurring before (44.3%) or after (41.4%) the recommendations. For children with polydactyly, plastic surgeons were more likely to perform polydactyly reconstruction at a younger age compared with orthopedic surgeons (<i>P</i> = .0001). <b>Conclusions:</b> Established expert recommendations for the treatment of congenital hand differences are largely not followed in practice in the United States. This suggests that practice patterns may not be determined by the surgical literature.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HAND\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1041-1047\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571587/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HAND\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447241257646\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447241257646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:建议重建先天性手部差异的时机差异很大。及时干预的目的是获得接近正常的外观和功能。我们评估了全国先天性手部差异手术时机的趋势,以确定干预措施是否与文献一致。方法:确定手术重建的推荐年龄。从 2012 年到 2020 年,我们查询了儿科国家手术质量改进项目数据库中因单纯性联合畸形 (SS)、复杂性联合畸形 (CS)、多指畸形或先天性扳机指而接受手术的儿童。我们进行了分组分析,以评估外科医生的亚专业(整形外科与骨科外科、儿科与全科)是否会影响修复时机。结果:先天性扳机指和CS重建手术大多在建议的年龄范围内进行(分别为73.8%和52.2%)。多指畸形修复主要早于建议年龄(54.0%)。SS重建的时间也不尽相同,有的早于(44.3%),有的晚于(41.4%)。与整形外科医生相比,整形外科医生更倾向于在多指畸形患儿较小的年龄进行多指畸形重建(P = .0001)。结论:在美国,治疗先天性手部差异的既定专家建议在实践中大多未得到遵循。这表明实践模式可能不是由外科文献决定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterizing the Timing of Surgical Repair of Congenital Hand Differences in the United States.

Background: Suggested timing of reconstruction of congenital hand differences varies widely. The goal of timely intervention is to achieve near-normal appearance and function. We evaluated national trends in surgical timing of congenital hand differences to determine whether interventions align with the literature. Methods: Recommended ages for surgical reconstruction were identified. The Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database was queried from 2012 to 2020 for children who underwent surgery for simple syndactyly (SS), complex syndactyly (CS), polydactyly, or congenital trigger finger. Subgroup analysis was conducted to assess whether the surgeon's subspecialty (plastic surgery vs orthopedic surgery, pediatric vs generalist) influenced the timing of repair. Results: Congenital trigger finger and CS reconstructions occurred largely within the recommended age range (73.8% and 52.2%, respectively). Polydactyly repairs primarily occurred earlier than the recommendations (54.0%). Timing of SS reconstruction was split, either occurring before (44.3%) or after (41.4%) the recommendations. For children with polydactyly, plastic surgeons were more likely to perform polydactyly reconstruction at a younger age compared with orthopedic surgeons (P = .0001). Conclusions: Established expert recommendations for the treatment of congenital hand differences are largely not followed in practice in the United States. This suggests that practice patterns may not be determined by the surgical literature.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HAND
HAND Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信