[全膝关节置换术中的骨内万古霉素]。

W F Martínez, F Tillet, E J Bochatey, F A Lopreite
{"title":"[全膝关节置换术中的骨内万古霉素]。","authors":"W F Martínez, F Tillet, E J Bochatey, F A Lopreite","doi":"10.35366/115812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis has significantly reduced the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in knee surgeries. However, for patients colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or those at risk of colonization, prophylaxis should include vancomycin. Intraosseous (IO) administration of vancomycin could enhance its effectiveness in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>a retrospective review was conducted, including 143 patients at risk of PJI scheduled for TKA who received IO vancomycin along with intravenous (IV) cefazolin, referred to as group I (GI), between May 2021 and December 2022. The occurrence of complications in the first three postoperative months was evaluated. Results were compared with 140 patients without risk factors who received standard IV prophylaxis, designated as group II (GII).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>in GI, 500 mg of IO vancomycin was administered, injected into the proximal tibia, in addition to standard IV prophylaxis. In GII, patients received only IV cefazolin. The incidence of complications was 1.64% in GI and 1.4% in GII. The PJI rate at 90 postoperative days was 0.69% in GI and 0.71% in GII.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IO vancomycin administration, along with standard IV prophylaxis, provides a safe and effective alternative for patients at risk of MRSA colonization. This approach minimizes complications associated with IV vancomycin use and addresses logistical challenges of timely administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":101296,"journal":{"name":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","volume":"38 3","pages":"172-178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Intraosseous vancomycin in total knee arthroplasty].\",\"authors\":\"W F Martínez, F Tillet, E J Bochatey, F A Lopreite\",\"doi\":\"10.35366/115812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis has significantly reduced the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in knee surgeries. However, for patients colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or those at risk of colonization, prophylaxis should include vancomycin. Intraosseous (IO) administration of vancomycin could enhance its effectiveness in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>a retrospective review was conducted, including 143 patients at risk of PJI scheduled for TKA who received IO vancomycin along with intravenous (IV) cefazolin, referred to as group I (GI), between May 2021 and December 2022. The occurrence of complications in the first three postoperative months was evaluated. Results were compared with 140 patients without risk factors who received standard IV prophylaxis, designated as group II (GII).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>in GI, 500 mg of IO vancomycin was administered, injected into the proximal tibia, in addition to standard IV prophylaxis. In GII, patients received only IV cefazolin. The incidence of complications was 1.64% in GI and 1.4% in GII. The PJI rate at 90 postoperative days was 0.69% in GI and 0.71% in GII.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IO vancomycin administration, along with standard IV prophylaxis, provides a safe and effective alternative for patients at risk of MRSA colonization. This approach minimizes complications associated with IV vancomycin use and addresses logistical challenges of timely administration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta ortopedica mexicana\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"172-178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta ortopedica mexicana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35366/115812\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35366/115812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:静脉注射抗生素预防性治疗大大降低了膝关节手术中假体周围关节感染(PJI)的发生率。然而,对于耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)定植的患者或有定植风险的患者,预防性治疗应包括万古霉素。材料与方法:研究人员进行了一项回顾性研究,其中包括 143 名计划接受 TKA 的有 PJI 风险的患者,他们在接受 IO 万古霉素治疗的同时还静脉注射了头孢唑啉,这些患者被称为 I 组(GI),时间为 2021 年 5 月至 2022 年 12 月。对术后前三个月的并发症发生率进行了评估。结果:在 GI 组中,除了标准的静脉注射预防外,还在胫骨近端注射了 500 毫克 IO 万古霉素。在 GII 中,患者只接受了静脉注射头孢唑啉。GI 并发症发生率为 1.64%,GII 为 1.4%。术后 90 天的 PJI 发生率在 GI 为 0.69%,在 GII 为 0.71%:万古霉素静脉注射和标准静脉注射预防为有 MRSA 定植风险的患者提供了一种安全有效的选择。这种方法最大程度地减少了与静脉注射万古霉素相关的并发症,并解决了及时用药的后勤难题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Intraosseous vancomycin in total knee arthroplasty].

Introduction: intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis has significantly reduced the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in knee surgeries. However, for patients colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or those at risk of colonization, prophylaxis should include vancomycin. Intraosseous (IO) administration of vancomycin could enhance its effectiveness in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Material and methods: a retrospective review was conducted, including 143 patients at risk of PJI scheduled for TKA who received IO vancomycin along with intravenous (IV) cefazolin, referred to as group I (GI), between May 2021 and December 2022. The occurrence of complications in the first three postoperative months was evaluated. Results were compared with 140 patients without risk factors who received standard IV prophylaxis, designated as group II (GII).

Results: in GI, 500 mg of IO vancomycin was administered, injected into the proximal tibia, in addition to standard IV prophylaxis. In GII, patients received only IV cefazolin. The incidence of complications was 1.64% in GI and 1.4% in GII. The PJI rate at 90 postoperative days was 0.69% in GI and 0.71% in GII.

Conclusions: IO vancomycin administration, along with standard IV prophylaxis, provides a safe and effective alternative for patients at risk of MRSA colonization. This approach minimizes complications associated with IV vancomycin use and addresses logistical challenges of timely administration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信