在处理大鼠挤压创伤性截肢时,评估异位再植对截肢者存活率的影响:一项实验研究。

Münür Selçuk Kendir, Bilsev İnce, Majid İsmayılzade, Zikrullah Baycar, Hayri Ahmet Burak Nurşen, Mehmet Dadaci
{"title":"在处理大鼠挤压创伤性截肢时,评估异位再植对截肢者存活率的影响:一项实验研究。","authors":"Münür Selçuk Kendir, Bilsev İnce, Majid İsmayılzade, Zikrullah Baycar, Hayri Ahmet Burak Nurşen, Mehmet Dadaci","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2024.39470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This controlled experimental study aimed to compare ectopic replantation with other replantation techniques in a rat model of crush amputations. It also assessed the impact of different replantation methods on the viability of amputates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty male Wistar albino rats were divided into four groups. Groin flaps served as the amputation model. Group 1 un-derwent guillotine-style amputation followed by orthotopic replantation, Group 2 experienced crush-type amputation and orthotopic replantation, Group 3 had crush-type amputation and orthotopic replantation with a vein graft, and Group 4 underwent crush-type amputation followed by ectopic replantation. Flap viability and perfusion rates were assessed on day 3 using an infrared perfusion as-sessment system. The ratio of viable area to total flap area and thrombus formation in the pedicle vessels were evaluated on day 7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Infrared evaluations on day 3 post-replantation revealed flap perfusion percentages of 73.5% in Group 1, 11.1% in Group 2, 65% in Group 3, and 64.1% in Group 4. Statistical analysis indicated that Group 1 exhibited the highest perfusion rates, while Group 2 showed the lowest. No differences were observed between Groups 3 and 4. On the seventh day, the average surviving flap areas were found to be 74.6% in Group 1, 2.5% in Group 2, 64.5% in Group 3, and 64% in Group 4. Statistically, Group 1 exhibited the best outcomes, while Group 2 had the poorest, with no differences between Groups 3 and 4. Additionally, thrombus formation was observed in the vessels of two animals in Group 1, nine in Group 2, and three each in Groups 3 and 4. Significant statistical differences were noted among the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that ectopic replantation and replantation with a vein graft are equally effective. The preferred method for crush-type replantations may depend on the patient's and the amputated limb's conditions. In crush-type amputations, we recommend vein graft repair if the patient's overall condition supports replantation and if crushed segments can be debrided without excessive shortening of the amputated part. If these conditions are not met, temporary ectopic replantation is advised to preserve the amputated limb.</p>","PeriodicalId":94263,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11230047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the effects of ectopic replantation on amputate survival in the management of crush traumatic amputations in rats: An experimental study.\",\"authors\":\"Münür Selçuk Kendir, Bilsev İnce, Majid İsmayılzade, Zikrullah Baycar, Hayri Ahmet Burak Nurşen, Mehmet Dadaci\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/tjtes.2024.39470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This controlled experimental study aimed to compare ectopic replantation with other replantation techniques in a rat model of crush amputations. It also assessed the impact of different replantation methods on the viability of amputates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty male Wistar albino rats were divided into four groups. Groin flaps served as the amputation model. Group 1 un-derwent guillotine-style amputation followed by orthotopic replantation, Group 2 experienced crush-type amputation and orthotopic replantation, Group 3 had crush-type amputation and orthotopic replantation with a vein graft, and Group 4 underwent crush-type amputation followed by ectopic replantation. Flap viability and perfusion rates were assessed on day 3 using an infrared perfusion as-sessment system. The ratio of viable area to total flap area and thrombus formation in the pedicle vessels were evaluated on day 7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Infrared evaluations on day 3 post-replantation revealed flap perfusion percentages of 73.5% in Group 1, 11.1% in Group 2, 65% in Group 3, and 64.1% in Group 4. Statistical analysis indicated that Group 1 exhibited the highest perfusion rates, while Group 2 showed the lowest. No differences were observed between Groups 3 and 4. On the seventh day, the average surviving flap areas were found to be 74.6% in Group 1, 2.5% in Group 2, 64.5% in Group 3, and 64% in Group 4. Statistically, Group 1 exhibited the best outcomes, while Group 2 had the poorest, with no differences between Groups 3 and 4. Additionally, thrombus formation was observed in the vessels of two animals in Group 1, nine in Group 2, and three each in Groups 3 and 4. Significant statistical differences were noted among the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that ectopic replantation and replantation with a vein graft are equally effective. The preferred method for crush-type replantations may depend on the patient's and the amputated limb's conditions. In crush-type amputations, we recommend vein graft repair if the patient's overall condition supports replantation and if crushed segments can be debrided without excessive shortening of the amputated part. If these conditions are not met, temporary ectopic replantation is advised to preserve the amputated limb.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11230047/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2024.39470\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2024.39470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:这项对照实验研究旨在比较异位再植与其他再植技术在大鼠挤压截肢模型中的应用。方法:40 只雄性 Wistar 白化大鼠分为四组:方法:40 只雄性 Wistar 白化大鼠分为四组。腹股沟皮瓣作为截肢模型。第 1 组未进行断头台式截肢,随后进行了异位再植;第 2 组进行了粉碎型截肢和异位再植;第 3 组进行了粉碎型截肢和静脉移植的异位再植;第 4 组进行了粉碎型截肢和异位再植。第 3 天使用红外线灌注评估系统对皮瓣的存活率和灌注率进行评估。第 7 天评估存活面积与皮瓣总面积的比率以及茎突血管中血栓的形成情况:结果:移植后第 3 天的红外线评估显示,第 1 组的皮瓣灌注率为 73.5%,第 2 组为 11.1%,第 3 组为 65%,第 4 组为 64.1%。 统计分析显示,第 1 组的灌注率最高,第 2 组最低。第 3 组和第 4 组之间没有差异。第七天,第一组的平均存活皮瓣面积为 74.6%,第二组为 2.5%,第三组为 64.5%,第四组为 64%。据统计,第一组的结果最好,第二组的结果最差,第三组和第四组之间没有差异。此外,第 1 组有 2 只动物的血管中观察到血栓形成,第 2 组有 9 只,第 3 组和第 4 组各有 3 只。各组之间存在显著的统计学差异:结果表明,异位再植和静脉移植再植同样有效。挤压型截肢的首选方法可能取决于患者和截肢肢体的情况。在粉碎型截肢中,如果患者的整体状况支持再植,并且粉碎的部分可以在不过度缩短截肢部分的情况下进行清创,我们建议采用静脉移植修复术。如果不符合这些条件,则建议进行临时异位再植以保留截肢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the effects of ectopic replantation on amputate survival in the management of crush traumatic amputations in rats: An experimental study.

Background: This controlled experimental study aimed to compare ectopic replantation with other replantation techniques in a rat model of crush amputations. It also assessed the impact of different replantation methods on the viability of amputates.

Methods: Forty male Wistar albino rats were divided into four groups. Groin flaps served as the amputation model. Group 1 un-derwent guillotine-style amputation followed by orthotopic replantation, Group 2 experienced crush-type amputation and orthotopic replantation, Group 3 had crush-type amputation and orthotopic replantation with a vein graft, and Group 4 underwent crush-type amputation followed by ectopic replantation. Flap viability and perfusion rates were assessed on day 3 using an infrared perfusion as-sessment system. The ratio of viable area to total flap area and thrombus formation in the pedicle vessels were evaluated on day 7.

Results: Infrared evaluations on day 3 post-replantation revealed flap perfusion percentages of 73.5% in Group 1, 11.1% in Group 2, 65% in Group 3, and 64.1% in Group 4. Statistical analysis indicated that Group 1 exhibited the highest perfusion rates, while Group 2 showed the lowest. No differences were observed between Groups 3 and 4. On the seventh day, the average surviving flap areas were found to be 74.6% in Group 1, 2.5% in Group 2, 64.5% in Group 3, and 64% in Group 4. Statistically, Group 1 exhibited the best outcomes, while Group 2 had the poorest, with no differences between Groups 3 and 4. Additionally, thrombus formation was observed in the vessels of two animals in Group 1, nine in Group 2, and three each in Groups 3 and 4. Significant statistical differences were noted among the groups.

Conclusion: The results indicate that ectopic replantation and replantation with a vein graft are equally effective. The preferred method for crush-type replantations may depend on the patient's and the amputated limb's conditions. In crush-type amputations, we recommend vein graft repair if the patient's overall condition supports replantation and if crushed segments can be debrided without excessive shortening of the amputated part. If these conditions are not met, temporary ectopic replantation is advised to preserve the amputated limb.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信