协助黑人患者做出植入式心律转复除颤器治疗的决策:通过创新设计减少 ICD 治疗中的种族差异视频(VIVID)试验的定性研究结果。

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Larry R Jackson, Kevin McKenna, Amy Corneli, Carrie Dombeck, Kathleen Brelsford, Kevin L Thomas
{"title":"协助黑人患者做出植入式心律转复除颤器治疗的决策:通过创新设计减少 ICD 治疗中的种族差异视频(VIVID)试验的定性研究结果。","authors":"Larry R Jackson, Kevin McKenna, Amy Corneli, Carrie Dombeck, Kathleen Brelsford, Kevin L Thomas","doi":"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The VIVID (Videos for Addressing Racial Disparities in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy via Innovative Designs) study was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a video-based decision support tool in enhancing informed consent for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation among Black patients who met guideline criteria for primary prevention ICDs. Within the broader VIVID randomized trial, a qualitative investigation was conducted to elucidate the decisional factors among Black individuals considering ICD implantation for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between October 2016 and July 2019, in-depth interviews were conducted at 2 time points from randomization, ≈7 days (time interval for the decision) and at 90 days; the time interval for determining ICD implantation. Interview findings were categorized by randomized groups, those assigned to 1 of the 2 encounter-based video decision support tools or standard care (without video). Interview participants were purposefully selected to ensure diversity across gender, age, educational background, research site, and randomization group; participants were sampled from 14 academic and community-based electrophysiology clinics in the United States. Data analysis employed applied thematic analysis techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A diverse sample of Black individuals were interviewed at 1 week (n=59; female, 37.3%) and 90 days (n=48; female, 39.6%). The primary factors influencing the decisions of Black individuals considering a primary prevention ICD implantation were (1) their clinicians' recommendations for ICD implantation; (2) their perception of their cardiac health status; and (3) a desire to prolong their lives for the sake of their families.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings offer valuable insights that may guide clinicians in their communication with Black patients during shared decision-making encounters related to ICD implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49221,"journal":{"name":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"e010550"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assisting Black Patients With Decision-Making for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy: Qualitative Findings From the Videos to Reduce Racial Disparities in ICD Therapy via Innovative Designs (VIVID) Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Larry R Jackson, Kevin McKenna, Amy Corneli, Carrie Dombeck, Kathleen Brelsford, Kevin L Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The VIVID (Videos for Addressing Racial Disparities in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy via Innovative Designs) study was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a video-based decision support tool in enhancing informed consent for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation among Black patients who met guideline criteria for primary prevention ICDs. Within the broader VIVID randomized trial, a qualitative investigation was conducted to elucidate the decisional factors among Black individuals considering ICD implantation for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between October 2016 and July 2019, in-depth interviews were conducted at 2 time points from randomization, ≈7 days (time interval for the decision) and at 90 days; the time interval for determining ICD implantation. Interview findings were categorized by randomized groups, those assigned to 1 of the 2 encounter-based video decision support tools or standard care (without video). Interview participants were purposefully selected to ensure diversity across gender, age, educational background, research site, and randomization group; participants were sampled from 14 academic and community-based electrophysiology clinics in the United States. Data analysis employed applied thematic analysis techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A diverse sample of Black individuals were interviewed at 1 week (n=59; female, 37.3%) and 90 days (n=48; female, 39.6%). The primary factors influencing the decisions of Black individuals considering a primary prevention ICD implantation were (1) their clinicians' recommendations for ICD implantation; (2) their perception of their cardiac health status; and (3) a desire to prolong their lives for the sake of their families.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings offer valuable insights that may guide clinicians in their communication with Black patients during shared decision-making encounters related to ICD implantation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e010550\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010550\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010550","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景VIVID(通过创新设计解决植入式心律转复除颤器治疗中种族差异的视频)研究是一项多中心随机对照试验,旨在评估基于视频的决策支持工具在提高符合一级预防ICD指南标准的黑人患者植入植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)知情同意的有效性。在更广泛的 VIVID 随机试验范围内,我们开展了一项定性调查,以阐明考虑植入 ICD 用于心脏骤停一级预防的黑人患者的决策因素:方法:2016 年 10 月至 2019 年 7 月期间,在随机化后的两个时间点,即≈7 天(决定的时间间隔)和 90 天(决定 ICD 植入的时间间隔)进行了深入访谈。访谈结果按随机分组进行分类,即分配到 2 种基于会诊的视频决策支持工具中的 1 种或标准护理(无视频)组。访谈参与者经过精心挑选,以确保性别、年龄、教育背景、研究地点和随机分组的多样性;访谈参与者来自美国 14 家学术和社区电生理学诊所。数据分析采用了应用主题分析技术:在 1 周(人数=59;女性,占 37.3%)和 90 天(人数=48;女性,占 39.6%)时对不同的黑人进行了访谈。影响黑人考虑植入一级预防 ICD 决定的主要因素有:(1)临床医生对植入 ICD 的建议;(2)他们对自己心脏健康状况的看法;(3)为了家人延长生命的愿望:这些发现提供了宝贵的见解,可指导临床医生在与黑人患者就 ICD 植入进行共同决策时与他们进行沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assisting Black Patients With Decision-Making for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy: Qualitative Findings From the Videos to Reduce Racial Disparities in ICD Therapy via Innovative Designs (VIVID) Trial.

Background: The VIVID (Videos for Addressing Racial Disparities in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy via Innovative Designs) study was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a video-based decision support tool in enhancing informed consent for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation among Black patients who met guideline criteria for primary prevention ICDs. Within the broader VIVID randomized trial, a qualitative investigation was conducted to elucidate the decisional factors among Black individuals considering ICD implantation for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest.

Methods: Between October 2016 and July 2019, in-depth interviews were conducted at 2 time points from randomization, ≈7 days (time interval for the decision) and at 90 days; the time interval for determining ICD implantation. Interview findings were categorized by randomized groups, those assigned to 1 of the 2 encounter-based video decision support tools or standard care (without video). Interview participants were purposefully selected to ensure diversity across gender, age, educational background, research site, and randomization group; participants were sampled from 14 academic and community-based electrophysiology clinics in the United States. Data analysis employed applied thematic analysis techniques.

Results: A diverse sample of Black individuals were interviewed at 1 week (n=59; female, 37.3%) and 90 days (n=48; female, 39.6%). The primary factors influencing the decisions of Black individuals considering a primary prevention ICD implantation were (1) their clinicians' recommendations for ICD implantation; (2) their perception of their cardiac health status; and (3) a desire to prolong their lives for the sake of their families.

Conclusions: These findings offer valuable insights that may guide clinicians in their communication with Black patients during shared decision-making encounters related to ICD implantation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, an American Heart Association journal, publishes articles related to improving cardiovascular health and health care. Content includes original research, reviews, and case studies relevant to clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The online-only journal is dedicated to furthering the mission of promoting safe, effective, efficient, equitable, timely, and patient-centered care. Through its articles and contributions, the journal equips you with the knowledge you need to improve clinical care and population health, and allows you to engage in scholarly activities of consequence to the health of the public. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes considers the following types of articles: Original Research Articles, Data Reports, Methods Papers, Cardiovascular Perspectives, Care Innovations, Novel Statistical Methods, Policy Briefs, Data Visualizations, and Caregiver or Patient Viewpoints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信