Danielle Carolina Pimenta, Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas, Lucas Camargo, Daniel Lima, Julia Kelso, Alba Navarro-Flores, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Felipe Fregni
{"title":"运动对疼痛人群大脑皮层兴奋性的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Danielle Carolina Pimenta, Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas, Lucas Camargo, Daniel Lima, Julia Kelso, Alba Navarro-Flores, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Felipe Fregni","doi":"10.1002/pri.2102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) studies examining exercise-induced neuroplasticity in pain populations have produced contradictory findings. We conducted a systematic review to explore how exercise impacts cortical excitability in pain populations using TMS metrics. This review aims to summarize the effect sizes and to understand their sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched multiple databases from inception to December 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with any type of pain population, including acute and chronic pain; exercise interventions were compared to sham exercise or other active interventions. The primary outcomes were TMS metrics, and pain intensity was the secondary outcome. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Cochrane tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included five RCTs (n = 155). The main diagnoses were fibromyalgia and cervical dystonia. The interventions included submaximal contractions, aerobic exercise, physical therapy, and exercise combined with transcranial direct current stimulation. Three studies are considered to have a high risk of bias. All five studies showed significant pain improvement with exercise. The neurophysiological data revealed improvements in cortical excitability measured by motor-evoked potentials; standardized mean difference = 2.06, 95% confidence interval 1.35-2.78, I<sup>2</sup> = 19%) but no significant differences in resting motor threshold. The data on intracortical inhibition/facilitation (ICI/ICF) was not systematically analyzed, but one study (n = 45) reported higher ICI and lower ICF after exercise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that exercise interventions positively affect pain relief by modifying corticospinal excitability, but their effects on ICI/ICF are still unclear. While the results are inconclusive, they provide a basis for further exploration in this area of research; future studies should focus on establishing standardized TMS measurements and exercise protocols to ensure consistent and reliable findings. A large-scale RCT that examines various exercise interventions and their effects on cortical excitability could offer valuable insights to optimize its application in promoting neuroplasticity in pain populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":"29 3","pages":"e2102"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exercise effects on cortical excitability in pain populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Carolina Pimenta, Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas, Lucas Camargo, Daniel Lima, Julia Kelso, Alba Navarro-Flores, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Felipe Fregni\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pri.2102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) studies examining exercise-induced neuroplasticity in pain populations have produced contradictory findings. We conducted a systematic review to explore how exercise impacts cortical excitability in pain populations using TMS metrics. This review aims to summarize the effect sizes and to understand their sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched multiple databases from inception to December 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with any type of pain population, including acute and chronic pain; exercise interventions were compared to sham exercise or other active interventions. The primary outcomes were TMS metrics, and pain intensity was the secondary outcome. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Cochrane tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included five RCTs (n = 155). The main diagnoses were fibromyalgia and cervical dystonia. The interventions included submaximal contractions, aerobic exercise, physical therapy, and exercise combined with transcranial direct current stimulation. Three studies are considered to have a high risk of bias. All five studies showed significant pain improvement with exercise. The neurophysiological data revealed improvements in cortical excitability measured by motor-evoked potentials; standardized mean difference = 2.06, 95% confidence interval 1.35-2.78, I<sup>2</sup> = 19%) but no significant differences in resting motor threshold. The data on intracortical inhibition/facilitation (ICI/ICF) was not systematically analyzed, but one study (n = 45) reported higher ICI and lower ICF after exercise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that exercise interventions positively affect pain relief by modifying corticospinal excitability, but their effects on ICI/ICF are still unclear. While the results are inconclusive, they provide a basis for further exploration in this area of research; future studies should focus on establishing standardized TMS measurements and exercise protocols to ensure consistent and reliable findings. A large-scale RCT that examines various exercise interventions and their effects on cortical excitability could offer valuable insights to optimize its application in promoting neuroplasticity in pain populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Research International\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"e2102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Research International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.2102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.2102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exercise effects on cortical excitability in pain populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) studies examining exercise-induced neuroplasticity in pain populations have produced contradictory findings. We conducted a systematic review to explore how exercise impacts cortical excitability in pain populations using TMS metrics. This review aims to summarize the effect sizes and to understand their sources of heterogeneity.
Methods: We searched multiple databases from inception to December 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with any type of pain population, including acute and chronic pain; exercise interventions were compared to sham exercise or other active interventions. The primary outcomes were TMS metrics, and pain intensity was the secondary outcome. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Cochrane tool.
Results: This review included five RCTs (n = 155). The main diagnoses were fibromyalgia and cervical dystonia. The interventions included submaximal contractions, aerobic exercise, physical therapy, and exercise combined with transcranial direct current stimulation. Three studies are considered to have a high risk of bias. All five studies showed significant pain improvement with exercise. The neurophysiological data revealed improvements in cortical excitability measured by motor-evoked potentials; standardized mean difference = 2.06, 95% confidence interval 1.35-2.78, I2 = 19%) but no significant differences in resting motor threshold. The data on intracortical inhibition/facilitation (ICI/ICF) was not systematically analyzed, but one study (n = 45) reported higher ICI and lower ICF after exercise.
Conclusions: These findings suggest that exercise interventions positively affect pain relief by modifying corticospinal excitability, but their effects on ICI/ICF are still unclear. While the results are inconclusive, they provide a basis for further exploration in this area of research; future studies should focus on establishing standardized TMS measurements and exercise protocols to ensure consistent and reliable findings. A large-scale RCT that examines various exercise interventions and their effects on cortical excitability could offer valuable insights to optimize its application in promoting neuroplasticity in pain populations.
期刊介绍:
Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.