"毒瘾不是一种选择"。#narcansaveslives:TikTok 上减低伤害的集体声音。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Health Communication Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1080/10410236.2024.2366709
Kelli S Boling, Patrick Habecker, Ciera E Kirkpatrick, Jessica Hample, Roma Subramanian, Allison Schlosser, Valerie Jones
{"title":"\"毒瘾不是一种选择\"。#narcansaveslives:TikTok 上减低伤害的集体声音。","authors":"Kelli S Boling, Patrick Habecker, Ciera E Kirkpatrick, Jessica Hample, Roma Subramanian, Allison Schlosser, Valerie Jones","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2024.2366709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using 100 videos posted to TikTok by harm reduction creators with the hashtags #narcansaveslives and #naloxonesaveslives, this study examines who is posting, what they are saying, and how they are explaining Narcan/naloxone to their followers. Incorporating the concept of reverse agenda setting, we examine how, through hashtags, TikTok creators can set the agenda for what is important to discuss in the harm reduction space. Findings demonstrate that harm reduction creators have developed a collective voice and created an affective public, attempting to educate others, shed stigma, and normalize the conversation around harm reduction. These creators are using TikTok to educate followers about the prevalence of opioid use, the availability of Narcan/naloxone, correcting misinformation, and discussing the reality of recovery. Echoing prior studies, this research illustrates how TikTok has become an essential resource for health questions, including opioid use. Practical implications are also discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"783-793"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Addiction is Not a Choice.\\\" #narcansaveslives: Collective Voice in Harm Reduction on TikTok.\",\"authors\":\"Kelli S Boling, Patrick Habecker, Ciera E Kirkpatrick, Jessica Hample, Roma Subramanian, Allison Schlosser, Valerie Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10410236.2024.2366709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Using 100 videos posted to TikTok by harm reduction creators with the hashtags #narcansaveslives and #naloxonesaveslives, this study examines who is posting, what they are saying, and how they are explaining Narcan/naloxone to their followers. Incorporating the concept of reverse agenda setting, we examine how, through hashtags, TikTok creators can set the agenda for what is important to discuss in the harm reduction space. Findings demonstrate that harm reduction creators have developed a collective voice and created an affective public, attempting to educate others, shed stigma, and normalize the conversation around harm reduction. These creators are using TikTok to educate followers about the prevalence of opioid use, the availability of Narcan/naloxone, correcting misinformation, and discussing the reality of recovery. Echoing prior studies, this research illustrates how TikTok has become an essential resource for health questions, including opioid use. Practical implications are also discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Communication\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"783-793\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2366709\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2366709","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究使用减低伤害创作者在 TikTok 上发布的 100 个视频,并使用 #narcansaveslives 和 #naloxonesaveslives 作为标签,研究了谁在发布视频、他们在说什么以及他们如何向粉丝解释 Narcan/纳洛酮。结合反向议程设置的概念,我们研究了TikTok创作者如何通过标签来设置减害空间的重要讨论议程。研究结果表明,减低伤害创作者已经形成了一种集体声音,并创建了一个情感公众,试图教育他人,消除耻辱感,并使围绕减低伤害的对话正常化。这些创作者利用TikTok向追随者宣传阿片类药物使用的普遍性、Narcan/纳洛酮的可用性、纠正错误信息并讨论康复的现实。与之前的研究相呼应,这项研究说明了 TikTok 如何成为解决健康问题(包括阿片类药物的使用)的重要资源。研究还讨论了实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Addiction is Not a Choice." #narcansaveslives: Collective Voice in Harm Reduction on TikTok.

Using 100 videos posted to TikTok by harm reduction creators with the hashtags #narcansaveslives and #naloxonesaveslives, this study examines who is posting, what they are saying, and how they are explaining Narcan/naloxone to their followers. Incorporating the concept of reverse agenda setting, we examine how, through hashtags, TikTok creators can set the agenda for what is important to discuss in the harm reduction space. Findings demonstrate that harm reduction creators have developed a collective voice and created an affective public, attempting to educate others, shed stigma, and normalize the conversation around harm reduction. These creators are using TikTok to educate followers about the prevalence of opioid use, the availability of Narcan/naloxone, correcting misinformation, and discussing the reality of recovery. Echoing prior studies, this research illustrates how TikTok has become an essential resource for health questions, including opioid use. Practical implications are also discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信