一个环境正义社区的便携式空气净化器使用情况和微粒物质暴露减少情况:试点研究。

IF 2.3 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Environmental Health Insights Pub Date : 2024-06-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786302241258587
Alina M McIntyre, Madeleine K Scammell, Patrick L Kinney, Kiran Khosla, Layne Benton, Roseann Bongiovanni, Jessica McCannon, Chad W Milando
{"title":"一个环境正义社区的便携式空气净化器使用情况和微粒物质暴露减少情况:试点研究。","authors":"Alina M McIntyre, Madeleine K Scammell, Patrick L Kinney, Kiran Khosla, Layne Benton, Roseann Bongiovanni, Jessica McCannon, Chad W Milando","doi":"10.1177/11786302241258587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Particulate matter (PM) exposure is associated with adverse health outcomes, including respiratory illness. A large fraction of exposure to airborne contaminants occurs in the home. This study, conducted over 5 months in a community with high asthma rates (Chelsea, MA, USA), investigated the use of portable air cleaners (PACs) to reduce indoor PM. Seven asthma-affected households participated, receiving a PAC (Austin Air Health Mate HEPA filter), a QuantAQ sensor to measure PM<sub>1</sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, PM<sub>10</sub> (µg/m<sup>3</sup>), and a HOBO plug-load data logger to track PAC usage. Results describe hourly and daily PM concentrations and PAC usage for each household. Hourly average PM concentrations decreased when PACs were turned on (vs. when they were turned off) across households during the study period: PM<sub>1</sub> decreased by 0.46 µg/m<sup>3</sup>, PM<sub>2.5</sub> decreased by 0.69 µg/m<sup>3</sup>, and PM<sub>10</sub> decreased by 3.22 µg/m<sup>3</sup>. PAC usage varied for each household, including constant usage in one household and only usage at certain times of day in others. Higher filtration settings led to lower PM, with significant reductions in some, but not all, homes. Our findings highlight some difficulties in implementing household PAC interventions, yet also provide evidence to support household-level interventions to reduce PM and other indoor sources of air pollution. We also highlight academic-community partnerships as contributing to evidence-based solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11827,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"11786302241258587"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11165963/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Portable Air Cleaner Usage and Particulate Matter Exposure Reduction in an Environmental Justice Community: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Alina M McIntyre, Madeleine K Scammell, Patrick L Kinney, Kiran Khosla, Layne Benton, Roseann Bongiovanni, Jessica McCannon, Chad W Milando\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11786302241258587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Particulate matter (PM) exposure is associated with adverse health outcomes, including respiratory illness. A large fraction of exposure to airborne contaminants occurs in the home. This study, conducted over 5 months in a community with high asthma rates (Chelsea, MA, USA), investigated the use of portable air cleaners (PACs) to reduce indoor PM. Seven asthma-affected households participated, receiving a PAC (Austin Air Health Mate HEPA filter), a QuantAQ sensor to measure PM<sub>1</sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, PM<sub>10</sub> (µg/m<sup>3</sup>), and a HOBO plug-load data logger to track PAC usage. Results describe hourly and daily PM concentrations and PAC usage for each household. Hourly average PM concentrations decreased when PACs were turned on (vs. when they were turned off) across households during the study period: PM<sub>1</sub> decreased by 0.46 µg/m<sup>3</sup>, PM<sub>2.5</sub> decreased by 0.69 µg/m<sup>3</sup>, and PM<sub>10</sub> decreased by 3.22 µg/m<sup>3</sup>. PAC usage varied for each household, including constant usage in one household and only usage at certain times of day in others. Higher filtration settings led to lower PM, with significant reductions in some, but not all, homes. Our findings highlight some difficulties in implementing household PAC interventions, yet also provide evidence to support household-level interventions to reduce PM and other indoor sources of air pollution. We also highlight academic-community partnerships as contributing to evidence-based solutions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Health Insights\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"11786302241258587\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11165963/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Health Insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786302241258587\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786302241258587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

接触颗粒物(PM)与不良健康后果(包括呼吸道疾病)有关。接触空气中污染物的很大一部分发生在家中。这项研究在哮喘发病率较高的社区(美国马萨诸塞州切尔西)进行,历时 5 个月,调查了使用便携式空气净化器 (PAC) 减少室内 PM 的情况。七个受哮喘影响的家庭参与了这项研究,他们获得了一台便携式空气净化器(Austin Air Health Mate HEPA 过滤器)、一个用于测量 PM1、PM2.5 和 PM10(微克/立方米)的 QuantAQ 传感器以及一个用于跟踪便携式空气净化器使用情况的 HOBO 插入式数据记录器。结果描述了每个家庭每小时和每天的 PM 浓度以及空调使用情况。在研究期间,各住户开启空调时(与关闭空调时相比),每小时的可吸入颗粒物平均浓度均有所下降:PM1 降低了 0.46 微克/立方米,PM2.5 降低了 0.69 微克/立方米,PM10 降低了 3.22 微克/立方米。每个家庭的空气净化器使用情况各不相同,其中一个家庭持续使用,而另一个家庭仅在一天中的某些时间使用。过滤设置越高,可吸入颗粒物越低,一些家庭(但不是所有家庭)的可吸入颗粒物显著减少。我们的研究结果凸显了在实施家庭室内空调干预措施方面存在的一些困难,但同时也为支持家庭层面的干预措施提供了证据,以减少可吸入颗粒物和其他室内空气污染来源。我们还强调了学术界与社区之间的合作关系,认为这有助于找到基于证据的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Portable Air Cleaner Usage and Particulate Matter Exposure Reduction in an Environmental Justice Community: A Pilot Study.

Particulate matter (PM) exposure is associated with adverse health outcomes, including respiratory illness. A large fraction of exposure to airborne contaminants occurs in the home. This study, conducted over 5 months in a community with high asthma rates (Chelsea, MA, USA), investigated the use of portable air cleaners (PACs) to reduce indoor PM. Seven asthma-affected households participated, receiving a PAC (Austin Air Health Mate HEPA filter), a QuantAQ sensor to measure PM1, PM2.5, PM10 (µg/m3), and a HOBO plug-load data logger to track PAC usage. Results describe hourly and daily PM concentrations and PAC usage for each household. Hourly average PM concentrations decreased when PACs were turned on (vs. when they were turned off) across households during the study period: PM1 decreased by 0.46 µg/m3, PM2.5 decreased by 0.69 µg/m3, and PM10 decreased by 3.22 µg/m3. PAC usage varied for each household, including constant usage in one household and only usage at certain times of day in others. Higher filtration settings led to lower PM, with significant reductions in some, but not all, homes. Our findings highlight some difficulties in implementing household PAC interventions, yet also provide evidence to support household-level interventions to reduce PM and other indoor sources of air pollution. We also highlight academic-community partnerships as contributing to evidence-based solutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Health Insights
Environmental Health Insights PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
22.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信