丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮与缓释纳曲酮治疗有或无刑事法律牵连者的阿片类药物使用障碍:X:BOT 随机对照试验的二次分析。

0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Dylan Rose Balter , Lisa B. Puglisi , James Dziura , David A. Fiellin , Benjamin A. Howell
{"title":"丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮与缓释纳曲酮治疗有或无刑事法律牵连者的阿片类药物使用障碍:X:BOT 随机对照试验的二次分析。","authors":"Dylan Rose Balter ,&nbsp;Lisa B. Puglisi ,&nbsp;James Dziura ,&nbsp;David A. Fiellin ,&nbsp;Benjamin A. Howell","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>There is uncertainty about whether criminal legal involvement (CLI) impacts the effectiveness of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). We aimed to determine whether CLI modifies the association between buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX) vs. extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) and MOUD treatment outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a secondary analysis of X:BOT, a 24-week multi-center randomized controlled trial comparing treatment outcomes between BUP-NX (<em>n</em> = 287) and XR-NTX (<em>n</em> = 283) in the general population. We used baseline Additional Severity-Index Lite responses to identify patients with recent CLI (<em>n</em> = 342), defined as active CLI and/or CLI in the past 30 days, and lifetime incarceration (<em>n</em> = 328). We explored recent CLI and lifetime incarceration as potential effect modifiers of BUP-NX vs. XR-NTX effectiveness on relapse, induction, and overdose. We conducted both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses for each outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In intention-to-treat analyses, recent CLI modified the effect of BUP-NX vs. XR-NTX on odds of successful induction (<em>p</em> = 0.03) and hazard of overdose (<em>p</em> = 0.04), but it did not modify the effect on hazard of relapse (<em>p</em> = 0.23). All participants experienced lower odds of successful induction with XR-NTX compared to BUP-NX, but the relative likelihood of successful induction with BUP-NX was lower than XR-NTX among individuals with recent CLI (OR: 0.25, 95 % CI: 0.13–0.47, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) compared to those without recent CLI (OR: 0.04, 95 % CI: 0.01–0.19, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Participants with recent CLI experienced similar hazard of overdose with XR-NTX and BUP-NX (HR: 1.12, 95 % CI: 0.42–3.01, <em>p</em> = 0.82), whereas those without recent CLI experienced greater hazard of overdose with XR-NTX compared to BUP-NX (HR: 12.60, 95 % CI: 1.62–98.03, <em>p</em> = 0.02). In per-protocol analyses, recent CLI did not modify the effect of MOUD on hazard of overdose (<em>p</em> = 0.10) or relapse (<em>p</em> = 0.41). Lifetime incarceration did not modify any outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Compared to individuals without recent CLI, individuals with recent CLI experienced decreased relative effectiveness of BUP-NX compared to XR-NTX for induction and overdose outcomes. This highlights the importance of considering the impact of recent CLI on opioid use disorder treatment outcomes. Future research should explore the mechanisms through which recent CLI modifies MOUD effectiveness and aim to improve MOUD effectiveness for individuals with recent CLI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Buprenorphine-naloxone vs. extended-release naltrexone for opioid use disorder in individuals with and without criminal legal involvement: A secondary analysis of the X:BOT randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Dylan Rose Balter ,&nbsp;Lisa B. Puglisi ,&nbsp;James Dziura ,&nbsp;David A. Fiellin ,&nbsp;Benjamin A. Howell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>There is uncertainty about whether criminal legal involvement (CLI) impacts the effectiveness of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). We aimed to determine whether CLI modifies the association between buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX) vs. extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) and MOUD treatment outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a secondary analysis of X:BOT, a 24-week multi-center randomized controlled trial comparing treatment outcomes between BUP-NX (<em>n</em> = 287) and XR-NTX (<em>n</em> = 283) in the general population. We used baseline Additional Severity-Index Lite responses to identify patients with recent CLI (<em>n</em> = 342), defined as active CLI and/or CLI in the past 30 days, and lifetime incarceration (<em>n</em> = 328). We explored recent CLI and lifetime incarceration as potential effect modifiers of BUP-NX vs. XR-NTX effectiveness on relapse, induction, and overdose. We conducted both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses for each outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In intention-to-treat analyses, recent CLI modified the effect of BUP-NX vs. XR-NTX on odds of successful induction (<em>p</em> = 0.03) and hazard of overdose (<em>p</em> = 0.04), but it did not modify the effect on hazard of relapse (<em>p</em> = 0.23). All participants experienced lower odds of successful induction with XR-NTX compared to BUP-NX, but the relative likelihood of successful induction with BUP-NX was lower than XR-NTX among individuals with recent CLI (OR: 0.25, 95 % CI: 0.13–0.47, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) compared to those without recent CLI (OR: 0.04, 95 % CI: 0.01–0.19, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Participants with recent CLI experienced similar hazard of overdose with XR-NTX and BUP-NX (HR: 1.12, 95 % CI: 0.42–3.01, <em>p</em> = 0.82), whereas those without recent CLI experienced greater hazard of overdose with XR-NTX compared to BUP-NX (HR: 12.60, 95 % CI: 1.62–98.03, <em>p</em> = 0.02). In per-protocol analyses, recent CLI did not modify the effect of MOUD on hazard of overdose (<em>p</em> = 0.10) or relapse (<em>p</em> = 0.41). Lifetime incarceration did not modify any outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Compared to individuals without recent CLI, individuals with recent CLI experienced decreased relative effectiveness of BUP-NX compared to XR-NTX for induction and overdose outcomes. This highlights the importance of considering the impact of recent CLI on opioid use disorder treatment outcomes. Future research should explore the mechanisms through which recent CLI modifies MOUD effectiveness and aim to improve MOUD effectiveness for individuals with recent CLI.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924001504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924001504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:刑事法律牵连(CLI)是否会影响阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)药物治疗的效果尚不确定。我们的目的是确定刑事法律参与是否会改变丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮(BUP-NX)与缓释纳曲酮(XR-NTX)之间的关系以及阿片类药物使用障碍的治疗效果:我们对X:BOT进行了二次分析,这是一项为期24周的多中心随机对照试验,比较了BUP-NX(n = 287)和XR-NTX(n = 283)在普通人群中的治疗效果。我们利用基线 "额外严重程度指数表"(Additional Severity-Index Lite)反应来识别近期有CLI(n = 342)(定义为过去30天内活动性CLI和/或CLI)和终生监禁(n = 328)的患者。我们将近期 CLI 和终生监禁作为 BUP-NX 与 XR-NTX 对复发、诱导和用药过量有效性的潜在效应调节因子进行了探讨。我们对每种结果都进行了意向治疗分析和按协议分析:在意向治疗分析中,近期 CLI 可改变 BUP-NX 与 XR-NTX 对成功诱导几率(p = 0.03)和用药过量危险(p = 0.04)的影响,但不会改变对复发危险(p = 0.23)的影响。与BUP-NX相比,所有参与者使用XR-NTX诱导成功的几率都较低,但在近期有CLI的个体中,使用BUP-NX诱导成功的相对几率低于XR-NTX(OR:0.25,95 % CI:0.13-0.47,p 结论:与近期没有CLI的个体相比,使用XR-NTX诱导成功的几率低于BUP-NX:与无近期CLI的患者相比,近期CLI患者使用BUP-NX的诱导和过量结果相对有效性低于XR-NTX。这强调了考虑近期CLI对阿片类药物使用障碍治疗结果的影响的重要性。未来的研究应探索近期CLI改变MOUD疗效的机制,并致力于提高近期CLI患者的MOUD疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Buprenorphine-naloxone vs. extended-release naltrexone for opioid use disorder in individuals with and without criminal legal involvement: A secondary analysis of the X:BOT randomized controlled trial

Introduction

There is uncertainty about whether criminal legal involvement (CLI) impacts the effectiveness of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). We aimed to determine whether CLI modifies the association between buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX) vs. extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) and MOUD treatment outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a secondary analysis of X:BOT, a 24-week multi-center randomized controlled trial comparing treatment outcomes between BUP-NX (n = 287) and XR-NTX (n = 283) in the general population. We used baseline Additional Severity-Index Lite responses to identify patients with recent CLI (n = 342), defined as active CLI and/or CLI in the past 30 days, and lifetime incarceration (n = 328). We explored recent CLI and lifetime incarceration as potential effect modifiers of BUP-NX vs. XR-NTX effectiveness on relapse, induction, and overdose. We conducted both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses for each outcome.

Results

In intention-to-treat analyses, recent CLI modified the effect of BUP-NX vs. XR-NTX on odds of successful induction (p = 0.03) and hazard of overdose (p = 0.04), but it did not modify the effect on hazard of relapse (p = 0.23). All participants experienced lower odds of successful induction with XR-NTX compared to BUP-NX, but the relative likelihood of successful induction with BUP-NX was lower than XR-NTX among individuals with recent CLI (OR: 0.25, 95 % CI: 0.13–0.47, p < 0.001) compared to those without recent CLI (OR: 0.04, 95 % CI: 0.01–0.19, p < 0.001). Participants with recent CLI experienced similar hazard of overdose with XR-NTX and BUP-NX (HR: 1.12, 95 % CI: 0.42–3.01, p = 0.82), whereas those without recent CLI experienced greater hazard of overdose with XR-NTX compared to BUP-NX (HR: 12.60, 95 % CI: 1.62–98.03, p = 0.02). In per-protocol analyses, recent CLI did not modify the effect of MOUD on hazard of overdose (p = 0.10) or relapse (p = 0.41). Lifetime incarceration did not modify any outcome.

Conclusions

Compared to individuals without recent CLI, individuals with recent CLI experienced decreased relative effectiveness of BUP-NX compared to XR-NTX for induction and overdose outcomes. This highlights the importance of considering the impact of recent CLI on opioid use disorder treatment outcomes. Future research should explore the mechanisms through which recent CLI modifies MOUD effectiveness and aim to improve MOUD effectiveness for individuals with recent CLI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信