{"title":"各种表面处理方法对丙烯酸义齿与热塑性尼龙义齿基托之间剪切粘接强度的影响。","authors":"Hubban Nasution, Merve Köseoğlu, Cortino Sukotjo","doi":"10.1111/jopr.13892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of mechanical, chemical, and mechanical-chemical surface treatment methods on shear bond strength between acrylic denture teeth and thermoplastic nylon denture base.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Maxillary central incisor teeth were treated with five different surface treatment methods: mechanical (sandblasting, T-shape diatoric holes), chemical (5% acetic acid solution, bonding agent), and mechanical-chemical (sandblasting + bonding agent) were embedded in thermoplastic nylon denture base (n = 10). A universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm per minute was used to test the shear bond strength. Data obtained were statistically evaluated using one-way ANOVA and followed with Tukey post hoc test (α = 0.05) RESULTS: T-shaped diatoric holes exhibited significantly higher shear bond strength among the surface treatment groups, followed by sandblasting + bonding agent, sandblasting, bonding agent, and the acetic acid group (p < 0.001) CONCLUSION: T-shaped diatoric holes as a mechanical surface treatment showed higher shear bond strength than other methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of various surface treatment methods on shear bond strength between acrylic denture teeth and thermoplastic nylon denture base.\",\"authors\":\"Hubban Nasution, Merve Köseoğlu, Cortino Sukotjo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jopr.13892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of mechanical, chemical, and mechanical-chemical surface treatment methods on shear bond strength between acrylic denture teeth and thermoplastic nylon denture base.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Maxillary central incisor teeth were treated with five different surface treatment methods: mechanical (sandblasting, T-shape diatoric holes), chemical (5% acetic acid solution, bonding agent), and mechanical-chemical (sandblasting + bonding agent) were embedded in thermoplastic nylon denture base (n = 10). A universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm per minute was used to test the shear bond strength. Data obtained were statistically evaluated using one-way ANOVA and followed with Tukey post hoc test (α = 0.05) RESULTS: T-shaped diatoric holes exhibited significantly higher shear bond strength among the surface treatment groups, followed by sandblasting + bonding agent, sandblasting, bonding agent, and the acetic acid group (p < 0.001) CONCLUSION: T-shaped diatoric holes as a mechanical surface treatment showed higher shear bond strength than other methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13892\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13892","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of various surface treatment methods on shear bond strength between acrylic denture teeth and thermoplastic nylon denture base.
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of mechanical, chemical, and mechanical-chemical surface treatment methods on shear bond strength between acrylic denture teeth and thermoplastic nylon denture base.
Materials and methods: Maxillary central incisor teeth were treated with five different surface treatment methods: mechanical (sandblasting, T-shape diatoric holes), chemical (5% acetic acid solution, bonding agent), and mechanical-chemical (sandblasting + bonding agent) were embedded in thermoplastic nylon denture base (n = 10). A universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm per minute was used to test the shear bond strength. Data obtained were statistically evaluated using one-way ANOVA and followed with Tukey post hoc test (α = 0.05) RESULTS: T-shaped diatoric holes exhibited significantly higher shear bond strength among the surface treatment groups, followed by sandblasting + bonding agent, sandblasting, bonding agent, and the acetic acid group (p < 0.001) CONCLUSION: T-shaped diatoric holes as a mechanical surface treatment showed higher shear bond strength than other methods.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.