研究助产士护理中高龄产妇的剖腹产情况。

Antita Kanjanakaew, MinKyoung Song, Martha Driessnack, Elise N Erickson
{"title":"研究助产士护理中高龄产妇的剖腹产情况。","authors":"Antita Kanjanakaew, MinKyoung Song, Martha Driessnack, Elise N Erickson","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cesarean rates are rising, especially for individuals of advanced maternal age (AMA), defined as aged 35 or older. The Robson 10-Group Classification System (TGCS) facilitates assessment and comparison of cesarean rates among individuals in different settings. In midwifery-led care, in which pregnant people are typically healthier and seek a vaginal birth, it is unknown whether individuals of AMA have different antecedents leading to cesarean compared with younger counterparts. This study aimed to examine antecedents contributing to cesarean using Robson TGCS for individuals across age groups in midwifery care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a secondary analysis of 2 cohort data sets from Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) and University of Michigan Health Systems (UMHS) hospitals. The samples were individuals in midwifery-led care birthing at either OHSU from 2012 to 2019 or UMHS from 2007 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11,951 individuals were studied. Overall cesarean rates were low; however, the rate for individuals of AMA was higher than the rate of their younger counterparts (18.30% vs 15.10%). The Robson groups were similar; however, the primary contributor among AMA individuals was group 5 (multiparous with previous cesarean), followed by group 2 [nulliparous with labor induced or prelabor cesarean], and group 1 [nulliparous with spontaneous labor]. In contrast, the primary contributors for younger individuals were groups 1, 2, and 5, respectively. In addition, prelabor cesarean and induced labor partly mediated the relationship between AMA and cesarean among nulliparous individuals, whereas prelabor cesarean was the key contributor to cesarean among multiparous people.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The cesarean rate in midwifery-led care was low. Using Robson TGCS provided additional insight into the antecedents to cesarean, rather than viewing cesarean as a single outcome. Future studies should continue to use Robson TGCS and investigate antecedents to cesarean, including factors influencing successful vaginal birth after cesarean in individuals of AMA.</p>","PeriodicalId":94094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining Cesarean Among Individuals of Advanced Maternal Age in Nurse-Midwifery Care.\",\"authors\":\"Antita Kanjanakaew, MinKyoung Song, Martha Driessnack, Elise N Erickson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jmwh.13656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cesarean rates are rising, especially for individuals of advanced maternal age (AMA), defined as aged 35 or older. The Robson 10-Group Classification System (TGCS) facilitates assessment and comparison of cesarean rates among individuals in different settings. In midwifery-led care, in which pregnant people are typically healthier and seek a vaginal birth, it is unknown whether individuals of AMA have different antecedents leading to cesarean compared with younger counterparts. This study aimed to examine antecedents contributing to cesarean using Robson TGCS for individuals across age groups in midwifery care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a secondary analysis of 2 cohort data sets from Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) and University of Michigan Health Systems (UMHS) hospitals. The samples were individuals in midwifery-led care birthing at either OHSU from 2012 to 2019 or UMHS from 2007 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11,951 individuals were studied. Overall cesarean rates were low; however, the rate for individuals of AMA was higher than the rate of their younger counterparts (18.30% vs 15.10%). The Robson groups were similar; however, the primary contributor among AMA individuals was group 5 (multiparous with previous cesarean), followed by group 2 [nulliparous with labor induced or prelabor cesarean], and group 1 [nulliparous with spontaneous labor]. In contrast, the primary contributors for younger individuals were groups 1, 2, and 5, respectively. In addition, prelabor cesarean and induced labor partly mediated the relationship between AMA and cesarean among nulliparous individuals, whereas prelabor cesarean was the key contributor to cesarean among multiparous people.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The cesarean rate in midwifery-led care was low. Using Robson TGCS provided additional insight into the antecedents to cesarean, rather than viewing cesarean as a single outcome. Future studies should continue to use Robson TGCS and investigate antecedents to cesarean, including factors influencing successful vaginal birth after cesarean in individuals of AMA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13656\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:剖宫产率正在上升,尤其是高龄产妇(AMA),即 35 岁或以上的产妇。罗布森 10 组分类系统(TGCS)有助于评估和比较不同环境下的剖宫产率。在助产士主导的护理中,孕妇通常更健康,并寻求阴道分娩,与年轻孕妇相比,AMA 孕妇是否有不同的导致剖宫产的先决条件尚不清楚。本研究旨在使用罗布森TGCS对助产护理中不同年龄组的个人进行剖宫产前因分析:本研究对俄勒冈健康与科学大学(OHSU)和密歇根大学卫生系统(UMHS)医院的两组队列数据进行了二次分析。样本是2012年至2019年期间在俄勒冈卫生与科学大学或2007年至2019年期间在密歇根大学卫生系统医院分娩的助产士:共有 11951 人接受了研究。总体剖宫产率较低;然而,老年医学协会成员的剖宫产率高于年轻成员(18.30% 对 15.10%)。罗布森组的情况类似;然而,AMA 中的主要贡献者是第 5 组(曾进行过剖宫产的多产妇),其次是第 2 组[曾进行过引产或产前剖宫产的空腹产妇]和第 1 组[曾进行过自然分娩的空腹产妇]。相比之下,1 组、2 组和 5 组分别是年轻产妇的主要因素。此外,产前剖宫产和引产在一定程度上介导了无阴道分娩者中AMA与剖宫产之间的关系,而产前剖宫产则是多胎妊娠者中剖宫产的主要因素:讨论:在助产士主导的护理中,剖宫产率较低。使用罗布森TGCS可进一步了解剖宫产的前因,而不是将剖宫产视为单一结果。未来的研究应继续使用罗布森TGCS,并调查剖宫产的前因,包括影响AMA患者剖宫产后成功阴道分娩的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining Cesarean Among Individuals of Advanced Maternal Age in Nurse-Midwifery Care.

Introduction: Cesarean rates are rising, especially for individuals of advanced maternal age (AMA), defined as aged 35 or older. The Robson 10-Group Classification System (TGCS) facilitates assessment and comparison of cesarean rates among individuals in different settings. In midwifery-led care, in which pregnant people are typically healthier and seek a vaginal birth, it is unknown whether individuals of AMA have different antecedents leading to cesarean compared with younger counterparts. This study aimed to examine antecedents contributing to cesarean using Robson TGCS for individuals across age groups in midwifery care.

Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of 2 cohort data sets from Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) and University of Michigan Health Systems (UMHS) hospitals. The samples were individuals in midwifery-led care birthing at either OHSU from 2012 to 2019 or UMHS from 2007 to 2019.

Results: A total of 11,951 individuals were studied. Overall cesarean rates were low; however, the rate for individuals of AMA was higher than the rate of their younger counterparts (18.30% vs 15.10%). The Robson groups were similar; however, the primary contributor among AMA individuals was group 5 (multiparous with previous cesarean), followed by group 2 [nulliparous with labor induced or prelabor cesarean], and group 1 [nulliparous with spontaneous labor]. In contrast, the primary contributors for younger individuals were groups 1, 2, and 5, respectively. In addition, prelabor cesarean and induced labor partly mediated the relationship between AMA and cesarean among nulliparous individuals, whereas prelabor cesarean was the key contributor to cesarean among multiparous people.

Discussion: The cesarean rate in midwifery-led care was low. Using Robson TGCS provided additional insight into the antecedents to cesarean, rather than viewing cesarean as a single outcome. Future studies should continue to use Robson TGCS and investigate antecedents to cesarean, including factors influencing successful vaginal birth after cesarean in individuals of AMA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信